Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0223-00137
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 04/07/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/20/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape Comments. | ||
| 03/21/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual can be found online at https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf With the City of Tucson edits at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf TD-DEV-0223-00137 1. Gravel drive requires special permission from city engineer, contingent on proof of stabilization or containment of gravel (UDC 7.4.6 I) Contact Stephen Blood at Stephen.Blood@tucsonaz.gov for approval. 2. Proposed drainage directs stormwater over the sidewalk between the two buildings. Stormwater must be contained underneath the sidewalk through use of scuppers per TSM 7-01.4.3 D. 3. Sidewalk is required along the 44th Street frontage. Pedestrian access must extend from the frontage to the entrance of the building per TSM 7-01.4.1 A. 4. Maximize water harvesting to comply with Low Impact Development Standards outlined in the Detention-Retention Manual. Water harvesting to the landscaped areas can be maximized though use of curb cuts and flush curbs. Make note of curb cuts and flush curbs in the site plan. 5. Pedestrian refuge required between proposed building and vehicle use area. Must be vertically separated by 6-inch standard curbs or bollards unless designated as an employee-only area (TSM 7-01). 6. The north arrows on pages 2-4 of the plans are incorrect, please correct. 7. Show the water harvesting basins proposed in the drainage report on the site plans. 8. First flush retention is required for the expanded area of the site, both the proposed parking lot and building. Provide first flush retention calculations in the drainage report. First flush retention requirements will likely be met by proposed water harvesting infrastructure, but provide figures similar to Tables 2.2 and 2.3 in the Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual to demonstrate that first flush requirements are being met for the new expansion. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/20/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: CUPPS WAREHOUSE EXPANSION ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0223-00137 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 710 E EVANS BL/132-15-005B ZONING: I-1 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Admin Manual 4.1: All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: - Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. - Add case number TD-DEC-0223-00137 on each sheet. 3. Provide a NPPO or NPPO waiver. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. NPPO Waiver Form: https://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/NPPOapp.pdf 4.The scales of Sheet S3 & S4 do not appear to match, please correct and make them both 1”=20’. 5. On Sheet S3 screen back layers so that the plants can be seen in the planting areas. 6. On Sheet S3, Landscape Plant Notes #11, indicates a sheet S7, please provide this detail sheet or revise your comments. 7. Provide a detail with root barriers on your plan. See: www.tucsonaz.gov/files/transportation/files/402_Tree_Planting_Near_Pavement_in_Plaza_Conditions.pdf 8. Sheet S4: Label separate irrigation water meter on plan. 9. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required per UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.3.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. Using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provides critical basin detention and first flush retention for all new development and impervious area. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With CoT edits to the manual are found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 10. Show all curb cuts, splash pads, and scuppers on not only the grading plan, but also the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan. 11. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. If using dg, at a 2” depth, make sure that the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for dg depth. 12. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
||
| 03/16/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Cupps Warehouse Expansion Development Package (1st Review) TD-DIV-0223-00137 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 16, 2023 DUE DATE: March 24, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 20, 2024. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Sheet 4 the page number is not correct. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DIV-0223-00137, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – There appears to be a discrepancy with the proposed use. Based on Permitting Note 2 the existing and proposed use of the site is Commercial Storage but the vehicle parking space calculation calls out Professional Office & Commercial Storage. Clarify the propose use(s). 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – The Expansion Calculation is not correct. The building and parking area expansion are two (2) separate calculations. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Dimension the width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for both 44th and Evans. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The one-way access lane off of 44th shows two different widths, on the plan it shows 19’ and on the 44th ST. TRIANGLE detail it shows 20’. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of 7.4.6.H.1 are met for the proposed rock vehicle use area. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide written approval from the City Engineer that approves the proposed surface called out under Plan Note 7, and the gravel one-way drive, see UDC Article 7.4.6.I.1.d. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As the requirements of UDC Article 7.4 apply to the entire site, UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 the vehicle parking shown along the northeast side of the building does not count toward the required or provided number of spaces. These spaces do not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.B & 7.4.6.K. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. Based on Permitting Note 2 the existing and proposed use of the site is Commercial Storage but the vehicle parking space calculation calls out Professional Office & Commercial Storage. Also, the ratio use under Commercial Storage is not correct, review UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, Commercial Storage, and provide the correct ratio. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5 the required accessible vehicle parking space is required to be a van accessible parking space. The calculation shall show that the “HC” space is required to be van accessible. Also, provide a detail for the van accessible space & access aisle that demonstrates that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502 are met. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for the requirement accessible parking space sign. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The angle shown for the angled parking does not appear to be correct. 30-degree parking is closer to a parallel parking space. It appears you are proposing 60-degree parking. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Per UDC Article 7.5.2.E.2 and Table 7.5.5-A a loading space is required. Review Table 7.5.5-A and provide a calculation and show the required space on the plan. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As long-term bicycle parking is required, provide a calculation that shows the number required and provided. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the existing and propose building within the footprint on the plan. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As you are providing vehicle access off of 44th per TSM Section 7-01.4.A provide the required sidewalk from the proposed building to 44th st. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The striped area called out under Plan Note 13 along the west side of the building is required to be a sidewalk, see TSM Section 7-01.41.B. This sidewalk is required to meet the requirements of TSM Sections 7-01.4.2 & 7-01.4.3. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note on the plan stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 02/15/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/14/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | External reviewers added and email request was sent | ||
| 04/07/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | ADOT has no comments. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 03/16/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello CDRC team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above development application. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Arizona 85716 (520) 837-8037 |
||
| 04/07/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/07/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 03/28/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REVIEW COMPLETED | Thank you, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY 7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300 Tucson, Arizona 85756 Phone 520-573-8100 Direct 520-573-4811 |
||
| 04/07/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/07/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 03/21/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/16/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/16/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/21/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/22/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-0223-00137 710 E. Evans Blvd. Comments: 1. Existing curb may remain if within tolerance of current standards. 2. Existing curb access ramp on the corner of Evans Blvd and 44th Street, may remain if within tolerance of current standards- P.A.G. standard 207. 3. New 5 Ft wide concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200, along the entire property frontage of 44th St, tie-in to curb access ramp. 4. New driveway apron at entrance off of 44th Street, per P.A.G. standard 206. 5. A sidewalk connection from the onsite circulation path to new sidewalk on 44th St. is needed. 6. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 7. The paved parking area in front of the existing building may remain. (No new sidewalk required here.) 8. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 9. Protect in place the existing catch basin. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/22/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-0223-00137 710 E. Evans Blvd. Comments: 1. Existing curb may remain if within tolerance of current standards. 2. Existing curb access ramp on the corner of Evans Blvd and 44th Street, may remain if within tolerance of current standards- P.A.G. standard 207. 3. New 5 Ft wide concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200, along the entire property frontage of 44th St, tie-in to curb access ramp. 4. New driveway apron at entrance off of 44th Street, per P.A.G. standard 206. 5. A sidewalk connection from the onsite circulation path to new sidewalk on 44th St. is needed. 6. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 7. The paved parking area in front of the existing building may remain. (No new sidewalk required here.) 8. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 9. Protect in place the existing catch basin. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |