Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0223-00137
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/23/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Cupps Warehouse Expansion Development Package (4th Review) TD-DEV-0223-00137 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 23, 2023 DUE DATE: July 15, 2023 This comment was not addressed. The comment response letter provided was for the 1st round of comments/ COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 20, 2024. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. This comment was not addressed. Based on the required number of vehicle parking spaces, 2, and you show 7 spaces on site, Zoning recommends that you revise the parking calculation to show 1 space required 7 spaces provided. Remove the space shown along the north side of the building from the plan. One (1) of the 7 space on site will need to meet the requirements of a van accessible parking space. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. The PDMR submitted cannot approve the parking spaces located within the right of way. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As the requirements of UDC Article 7.4 apply to the entire site, UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 the vehicle parking shown along the northeast side of the building does not count toward the required or provided number of spaces. These spaces do not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.B & 7.4.6.K. 2. This comment was not addressed. The TSMR submitted cannot eliminate the required sidewalk. As you are proposing to eliminate a required sidewalk a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As you are providing vehicle access off of 44th per TSM Section 7-01.4.A provide the required sidewalk from the proposed building to 44th st. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 07/10/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-0223-00137 710 E. Evans Blvd. Comments: 1. Existing curb may remain if within tolerance of current standards. 2. Existing curb access ramp on the corner of Evans Blvd and 44th Street, may remain if within tolerance of current standards- P.A.G. standard 207. 3. New 5 Ft wide concrete sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200, along the entire property frontage of 44th St, tie-in to curb access ramp. 4. New driveway apron at entrance off of 44th Street, per P.A.G. standard 206. 5. A sidewalk connection from the onsite circulation path to new sidewalk on 44th St. is needed. 6. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 5’ X 5’ ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 5’ X 5’ and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions. 7. The paved parking area in front of the existing building may remain. (No new sidewalk required here.) 8. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited. 9. Protect in place the existing catch basin. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/18/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning denial and traffic engineering denial Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/18/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Traffic Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Request not to construct sidewalk is denied. David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov DTM Project Coordinator |
||
| 07/14/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See TSMR comments from Traffic Engineering. A TSMR/PDMR cannot be used to approve existing parking conditions. A variance will be required. |
||
| 06/08/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |