Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0126-00017
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2026 | Design Review Standard | NOT REQUIRED | Applicant has indicated the SMD will not be used for this proposal. | ||
| 03/19/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Activity Number: TD-DEV-0126-00017 (3rd Review) Project: Minor Development Plan for new stair and ramp. Location: 750 E BROADWAY BL Review Date: 3/19/2026 Reviewers: Marco Contreras – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering & Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer Related Cases: *This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. * City of Tucson Code: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes Floodplain Code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19333 Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Vertical Separation will be required along the pathway going from West to East. An attachment redline document will be attached to demonstrate this stipulation. This is required in compliance with TSM 7-01.4.2.A. a. This can be achieved through the use of 6-inch curbing, bollards spaced no less than 4-ft and no more than 5-ft separate, or through some other form of physical separation. 2. The line work for the ramp shows what may either be a grade break for the ramp, or a potential unlabeled scupper going under the ramp from the planter towards the north to the access path next to the PAAL. Please correct this or label accordingly. If it is a scupper, it’d not be considered compliant as previously called out regarding TSM 7-01.4.3E If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras at Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov or Joe Macaulay at Joe.Macaulay@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/01/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. COMMENT: If a lot combination will not be pursued, please submit a copy of the Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf) which indicates that the land owners and City of Tucson recognize the two parcels are functioning as an integrated site. 2. COMMENT: See comments from Site Engineering regarding the vertical separation required for a pedestrian path when it is between a PAAL and building per UDC Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.1.C (C. A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene) and 7-01.4.2.A (A. Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks;). Contact Fernando Garcia, Lead Planner, Site Zoning at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 04/01/2026 | Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | Applicant has indicated the SMD will not be utilized for this project. As such, Historic review is not required. Historic review would be required if the SMD (optional UOD zoning overlay) were to be utilized, as this property contains a contributing historic building to the Sunshine Mile National Register Historic District. | ||
| 03/24/2026 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ROW permit required prior to working in the ROW |