Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0126-00016
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 06/25/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Krista Hansen – Lead Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Twice the Ice Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0126-00016 (2284 E BENSON HY) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6/25/2026 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 26, 2027. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. Previous Comment 1: Zoning could not find a Certificate of Occupancy (CofO) on record for Marymar Events. Please include a copy on the next submittal. If one cannot be provided, a. this site may be eligible for the issuance of a CofO if it meets the criteria in UDC 3.3.3.H: Zoning Compliance for Site Improvements in Existence on May 1, 2025, or b. it will be considered a Change of Use and will require full code compliance for the entire site (Parcels 13219017B and 132190130) Follow-Up to Previous Comment 1: This comment still stands. The 2005 aerial image provided does not match the most recent aerials of the site. Unpermitted accessory structures (storage containers, etc.) have been added to the west corner of the parcel (behind the business), an unpermitted storage shed was added to the east corner (adjacent to the outdoor dining) and parking has been re-striped / reconfigured. To meet the criteria of UDC 3.3.3.H, the site must revert back to how it looked in 2005, which will require the removal of all new structures and re-striping the parking lot. 2. Previous Comment 2: The site will require a lot combination of Parcels 13219017B and 132190130 processed through Pima County Assessors: www.asr.pima.gov/Downloads/Forms/ComboRequest.pdf. Follow-up to Previous Comment 2: On the next submittal, please attach documentation of the approved lot combination or an email confirmation from Pima County showing that the lot combination is processing. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note: All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 3. Previous Comment 8: 2-06.4.7.D - Add the note that is listed in the standard above. Follow-up to Previous Comment 8: This comment still stands. Add the note that is listed in the standard above. 4. Previous Comment 10: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Parking calculations are incorrect. Recalculate using the Uses listed in Comment 5. Calculate the required parking for Marymar Events using the total SF (primary structure, accessory storage buildings, and outdoor seating). Follow-up to Previous Comment 10: A. A minimum of 2 van accessible parking spaces are required when 31 spaces are provided. Add Accessible Spaces to parking calculation table and show 2 spaces on the site plan. B. The number of spaces provided does not meet the minimum requirements. To reduce the number of required spaces, and Individual Parking Plan (IPP) is required. Please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov to learn more. 5. Previous Comment 11: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – If a Change of Use is required (per Comment 1), bicycle parking requirements apply for Marymar Events. Add calculations to Sheet 1 and indicate locations on the site plan. Follow-up to Previous Comment 11: Until the site requirements are determined, this comment still stands. 6. Previous Comment 13: 2-06.4.9.R - If a Change of Use is required (per Comment 1), a pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all areas of development on-site and to any adjacent street frontage. Follow-up to Previous Comment 13: When taking a second look at 3.3.3.H, pedestrian circulation is not included in the “existing site improvements that are not subject to compliance,” (UDC 3.3.3.H.3) and therefore, must meet current code. A pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all areas of development on-site and to any adjacent street frontage. 7. Comment 7: Under Streets and Roads Notes on the Cover Sheet, please add “This project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria in UDC Article 5.5 Gateway Corridor Zone. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Krista Hansen at Krista.hansen@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package and comment response letter. |
||
| 06/01/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/09/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |