Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0126-00014
Parcel: 13315299A

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0126-00014
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/13/2026 NPPO Standard APPROVED
02/09/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT If you have any questions about this review comment, I can be reached at Robert.Sherry@tucsonaz.gov
1. The utility plan shows a 12” water main running west from N Indian Ruins Road. Verify this with Tucson Water: their map shows only a ¾” service connection serving a 5/8” water meter at this location. In addition, the water main on N Indian Ruins Road is only an 8” line.
2. Show the location and size of the proposed new water meters (i.e., domestic water and irrigation water meters). Installation of the water meters are to be 3” from the property line, in the right of way (see Tucson Water Standard Detail SD-309 https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/living-and-working/parks-and-recreation/documents/sd-309_rev.pdf
3. The installation of the reduced pressure assembly shall be, “…outside, above ground, as close as possible to the water meter or service connection as possible and on private property...” (see Tucson Water Standard Detail SD-1802 https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/living-and-working/parks-and-recreation/documents/sd-1802.pdf
4. The maximum distance between cleanouts in the building sewer shall be 100 feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2024.
02/06/2026 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 4350 E. Irvington Road
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
February 6, 2026
WO#T174427
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: AUTOZONE AZ10907
TD-DEV-0126-00014
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the
development plan submitted 1/21/2026. There are existing facilities within the
development which are not depicted upon the plan. Existing facilities are not on the
plans, but do not appear to be in conflict. See attached TEP map. Further: TEP
Facilities & easements missing from development plans. TEP Easements Bk 4800 Pg
523, Bk 5890 Pg 1046, Bk 7322 Pg 717 & Bk 714.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Martin Rodriguez
(520) 991-5495
mrodriguez@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
02/13/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT DTM Comments - Review and Call out following Comments from Pre- Submittal meeting -
1) Driveways will need to the be brought to PAG 206 standards. This applies to the 2 Entries of Tanque Verde and the Shared Entry on South west side of property of Indian Ruins Rd. Driveways to be full concrete construction to back of sidewalk with cross slope not exceeding 2%
2) Damaged Sidewalk Panels abutting property frontage to be repaired
3) Any work that is required to be performed within the City of Tucson Right of Way will requires submission of Separate and Individual Right of Way permits be scope of work performed

2) Any work that is required to be performed within the City of Tucson Right of Way will requires submission of Separate and Individual Right of Way permits be scope of work performed.
01/22/2026 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit: TD-DEV-0126-00014
Location: 6910 E TANQUE VERDE RD
Review Date: 1/22/2026

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code.

Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf

Site Engineering Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0126-00014, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.
2. Provide Sight visibility triangles for all the site entrances, along Tanque Verde RD and Indian Ruins RD in compliance with TSM 10-01.5.0. NOTE: Tanque Verde RD is designated as an Arterial RD & Indian Ruins RD is designated as a local RD. These designations will be used for Table 5.3
3. Provide trash enclosure details in compliance with TSM 8-01.5.0 Provide the Waste Stream Calculations for the entire site according to TSM 8-01.8.0. It’s encouraged to use the figures presented in TSM 8-01.9.0 for minimum basis for details at least for the Dumpster layout shown.
4. Remove all unused and crossed out construction details from the plan set.
Pedestrian Circulation Comments:
5. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, common areas, and the sidewalk on all the street frontages per TSM 7-01.3.3. Demonstrate how this is achieved to connecting street frontage along Tanque Verde RD and Indian Ruins RD as well as connecting to the trash enclosure on the south portion of the site.
6. In reference to the wheel stops for the ADA parking spaces, wheel stop curbing must be a minimum of two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space. UDC 7.4.6.H.3 Using the current scale shows a measurement of 2’-4¼”
7. A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. TSM 7-01.4.0. It will be required to be demonstrated how this is achieved for the southern side of the proposed Building.
Grading comments:
8. Show the 2-foot minimum grading setback from the property lines on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0
9. Revise trash enclosure details and grading plan to show the ramps slope being 2% away from enclosure as well as the enclosure slab sloping 1% to the gate.
Drainage Comments:
10. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to each basin on the grading plan (Includes Stormwater Harvesting basins/landscaping). Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. If applicable, detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. If applicable, retention volume, cubic feet; d. If applicable, first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; e. If applicable, Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. If applicable, Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; and i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appears too narrow for such details.
11. Keynotes 19 & 20 on the site plan call-out hand placed Riprap, ensure to include the detail that it is Hand placed riprap with filter fabric.
12. Show that erosion protection is used for all inlet and outlet structures on the Grading sheet and details. The erosion protection shall extend below the finished grade of the basin floor and/or side slope to the appropriate design depth. DSSDR 4.8.1.4 Show this for all inlet & outlet structures.
13. Basins shall have a minimum of 1 sediment level measurement device, which can be incorporated into the weir or the side slope or constructed as a separate stand-alone device. The device(s) shall be located where sediment is likely to accumulate DSSDR 4.4.1.4
14. Due to the shear amount of retention required/proposed for this development, it will be required that infiltration (Percolation) testing be done for all four proposed Ret/Det basin locations.
a. Justification – Site consists of Type C & D soils which are associated with slower infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. This is also due to retention provided exceeding 6,000+ CF
b. The maximum storage time for a basin that intercepts runoff from a watershed up to 10 acres in size is 12 hours. The storage time is defined as the time required for stormwater to be removed from the basin DSSDR 4.5.1. It will be required to demonstrate in the drainage report that the basins fall within compliance of the required drain down time.
c. It is recommended that more detention be provided rather than retention due to the City of Tucson’s prominent C & D soil groups.
15. Show that the Water harvesting area along the West parking area is in compliance with being 6-inches from back of curb.
Drainage report comments:
16. Revise the objectives section of the report to replace “Pima county” with “City of Tucson.” When referring to the requirements that are being imposed and achieved.
17. Provide all City of Tucson Hydrologic Data sheets used for computing the 2-, 10-, &100-year peak discharges. Pima County Data sheets will not be accepted. Ensure to use the required 3-inches for the one-hour rainfall depth is used for the calculations.
18. Show that the retention/detention basin (Water harvesting basins as well) is the minimum required 10 feet setback from structures. DSSDR 5.3.1.11 If they are to be proposed within that setback, Geotechnical justification must be included in the provided Geotech report to provide recommendations on possible reduced setback requirements.
19. An inspection and maintenance protocol including frequency of inspection, a checklist of items to be inspected and recommended maintenance when an inspection identifies a maintenance requirement shall be prepared by an Arizona registrant should be included at the end of the provided drainage report. DSSDR 4.1.1

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Marco Contreras
Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
02/13/2026 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: PLAN SET (DP) FOR AN AUTOZONE RETAIL AUTO-PARTS STORE
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0126-00014
ADDRESS: 6910 E TANQUE VERDE RD
ZONING: COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-1)
LAND USE: RETAIL COMMERCIAL
02.13.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING, PER-THE-CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM).

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Include site water budget calculations demonstrating that 50 percent of the plant water needs are being met by rainwater harvesting. If a copy of the city approved water budget table is needed, please let us know and we’ll email the spreadsheet. If there is another method for these calculations that you have used on previous projects, that is fine. Include the calculations on the CRWH Plan.

2. A separate irrigation water meter is required. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0. Or see City of Tucson Ordinance 10597 -- Sec. 6-182. Rainwater Harvesting Plan: Number 3 (a) A separate water meter connected to the main water supply; or (b) An irrigation sub-meter.

3. Provide the development package activity number, TD-DEV-0126-00014, adjacent to the title block on all site landscape sheets, per Administrative Manual 2-06.4.3.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
02/11/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM:
Bobby Parsons
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
Autozone – 6910 E. Tanque Verde Rd. Tucson, AZ 85715
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0126-00014

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/11/2026
DUE DATE: 2/11/2026

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 20, 2027.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0126-00014, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – List the existing and proposed use of the property and any associated Use Specific Standards as noted by the standard above. Sheet 1 says the parcel is undeveloped however there is an existing building on the property.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R).

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Please draw, label, and dimension all easements located on the property as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Please include all of the information as noted by the standard above for both E. Tanque Verde Rd. and N. Indian Ruins Rd.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 13315299A & 13315299B, a lot combination is required. Either provide the approved lot combination request form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. Contact Pima County for the Combo Request. The Covenant can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – The zoning labeled across E. Tanque Verde is incorrect. CR-2 is not a zone category for properties located within the City of Tucson. Please label these properties with the correct zoning as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Please provide the sight visibility triangles for all entrances as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Please include the information as noted by the standard above for both E. Tanque Verde Rd. and N. Indian Ruins Rd.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a –Please call out the required van accessible ADA space as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – If any new easements are proposed, please include the information as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Please show pedestrian connectivity to both E. Tanque Verde Rd. and to the trash enclosures as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Please include the information as noted by the standard above for both E. Tanque Verde Rd. and N. Indian Ruins Rd.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – The proposed monument sign will require a separate sign permit.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
01/15/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
01/21/2026 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED EXTERNAL REVIEWERS
CDRC added: TEP, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent toTEP, and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG.
01/21/2026 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
01/21/2026 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
01/21/2026 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
02/10/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
01/16/2026 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
01/20/2026 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
01/23/2026 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED