Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0126-00003
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Historic | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Real Estate Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/15/2026 | Design Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Property is located within the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) overlay zone, and within the Tucson Community Center Historic Landscape National Register. Please submit a complete Design Package as a subrecord of this Development Package, demonstrating compliance with RNA and historic preservation requirements, following these instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf. Please note the Design Package will need to be reviewed by the Tucson Pima County Historical Commission's Landscape Subcommittee and the Plans Review Subcommittee, as well as by the Design Review Bpard (DRB). Here's an overview of the RNA review process: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/rna-application-and-review-process.pdf. If you have any questions, please let me know: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you. | ||
| 01/16/2026 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | This property is located within the Rio Nuevo Area. Full Historic Review is required. SPECIAL DISTRICT SUB-RECORD: You must create a Special District (SD) Sub-Record in TDC Online for your Historic Review. For instructions on how to create a Sub-Record, see: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/2/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/sub-records.pdf. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: Historic Review requires a supplemental application called a Design Package. Please see the Historic & Special Districts Application Instructions for more information about submittal requirements: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/special_districts_application_instructions_3.3.2025.pdf. As part of your Design Package, please include the following: project narrative, site plan, roof plan (if there are any changes proposed including location of mechanical equipment), elevations, window and door schedule, photographs of existing conditions, Development Zone map as described in instructions along with precedent photographs, and product names/specifications/brochures. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: The Tucson Pima County Historical Commission, Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS) held a courtesy review of the project at its January 8, 2026 meeting. Commissioner comments include: • Support the idea of replacing the existing oleander along Broadway with a different plant species that will be conducive to growing north of the building due to shade • Support the idea to differentiate new guardrails • Support the idea to carry design language of paving, including the scoring pattern, to new areas • Support the idea of doing something simple and deferential for the proposed pedestrian bridge that would connect the hotel area to the Tucson Community Center, and recommend looking to existing pedestrian buildings in the TCC as precedent; pedestrian bridges are unique to this part of downtown so they need careful consideration in their design language • For submittal, a map showing the parcels boundaries and the boundaries of the National Register Historic District would be helpful. |
||
| 01/12/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-0126-00003 Location: 181 W BROADWAY BL Review Date: 1/12/2026 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Comments: 1. Revise the Sight visibility triangles for the site entrances along Broadway BL in compliance with TSM 10-01.5.0. NOTE: Broadway BL is designated as an Arterial RD. This designation will be used for Table 5.3 a. Revise the Far side SVT for the Broadway entrance more West to be compliant with TSM 10-01.5.0 as it currently only has a 20x30 SVT which does not apply here as a car could possibly turn left from said entrance. 2. Provide a measurement call-out to show the spacing between the “temporary wheel stops” to ensure compliance with the minimum opening being 4 feet spacing or maximum 5 feet clear. UDC 7.4.6 for containing the PAAL/access lane area 3. Keynote 13# (Sheet DP-3Site) calls out a retaining wall - it will be required that a separate structural wall permit with structural calculations/drawings be submitted for construction of the wall. 4. Provide construction detail(s) for the new bridge proposed by keynote #21 Drainage comments: 5. Provide all City of Tucson Hydrologic Data sheets used for computing the 100-year peak discharge. Pima County Data sheets will not be accepted. Ensure to use the required 3-inches for the one-hour rainfall depth is used for the calculations. 6. It will be required that infiltration testing be done for the temporary basin location prior to full approval of the DP to ensure proper drainage a. As the site contains a majority (100% HSG D) of D soils. Detention is preferred over the amount of retention proposed. It is suggested that this temporary basin be designed for detention rather than retention. 7. More clarification is needed regarding the “Temporary harvesting basin”. a. Is it intended to account for all future improvements? If so then it’d be more so permanent rather than temporary. b. If future site work will alter said temporary basin, what would the foreseeable timeline look for said basins existence? 8. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to each basin on the grading plan (Includes Stormwater Harvesting basins/landscaping). Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. If applicable, detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. If applicable, retention volume, cubic feet; d. If applicable, first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; e. If applicable, Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. If applicable, Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; and i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3. This can be done through an additional detail sheet or included on current basin detail sheet if the grading plans appears too narrow for such detail. It should be noted that additional Site Engineering comments may be forthcoming in future review cycles as provided comments and development changes may bring forth further callouts. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/23/2026 | Zoning Modifications - Variance Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Pending on site zoning review comments, a Board of Adjustment variance may or may not be required for the project. If you have questions on this transmittal, email Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov | ||
| 01/06/2026 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/09/2026 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added: TEP ADOT, HIST, LANDSCAPE, REAL ESTATE, VARIANCES, DESIGN REV, ENVR SERV, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent toTEP ADOT, and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG. |
||
| 01/09/2026 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/09/2026 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/09/2026 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/12/2026 | MITZ District Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/06/2026 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/08/2026 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |