Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0125-00031
Parcel: 129043480

Address:
446 S PLUMER AV

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0125-00031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/12/2026 NPPO Standard APPROVED
N/A CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT Good afternoon,

Pima County Addressing is ready to approve TD-DEV-0125-00031 upon payment of unpaid balance. (P25AD00845)


Thank you,







David Wilging

Planner I - Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services

201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-6381
N/A External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A Site Engineering Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
06/11/2026 Commercial Plumbing Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0125-00031
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 446 S PLUMER AV TUCSON, AZ 85719

Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review.

If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov

COMMENTS:

1. Previous comments not fully addressed.
2. Please show the location of the private sewer line serving each dwelling. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024. Sewer lines shall not be routed through adjacent properties.
3. Please show the location of the water supply line serving each dwelling. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2024.
a. Private water service lines may not cross property lines to serve another parcel. The accessory structures appear to from the existing meter serving the church, which is not permitted per Tucson Water’s Remote Water Meter Policy.
b. Tucson Water’s Remote Meter Policy No. IV-B.08, Eff. 07/14/2009 requires all of the following:
i. Each lot must have its own water meter.
ii. The water meter for any given lot must lie within that lot’s frontage onto a public street, private street, or utility easement that contains an existing water main that can serve that lot.
iii. The private water line from a water meter to building must lie on just one lot. The private water line from a water meter to a building may not encroach into, or cross a second lot, even in a private water easement.
4. Please show all building sewer cleanouts on the site plan.
a. Show the cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer. Reference: Section 708.1.3, IPC 2024.
b. Please provide a cleanout in the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way. Reference: Pima County Standard Detail RWRD 401, 2021.
06/10/2026 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT New driveways on 15th st should be constructed per PAG SD 206. Curb return driveways on local streets need to meet the 100 ADT per TSM 10.4.3.B.
06/12/2026 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR EXISTING CHURCH BUILDING PARKING ADDITION AND LAYOUT OF NEW ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (DWELLING UNITS)
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0125-00031
ADDRESS: 446 S PLUMER AV
ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE; URBAN OVERLAY DISTRICT - SUNSHINE MILE - UOD-3 KINO SOUTH SUBAREA
LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY
REVIEW NO. 2
6.12.2026

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PER THE CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM) FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING.

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL OF THE SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Include a proposed plant material legend. Include the plant symbol, botanical name, common name, gallon size at installation, and total quantity.

2. Update leader callout to state, “required trees 2 and 3 to satisfy the west interior landscape border requirement”.

3. The required and provided trees for the number of parking spaces was not included per previous comments. Include the required and provided calculation summary.

4. There is an open space calculation on the planting plan. State on the cover sheet whether or not this project is opting into the Sunshine Mile District Overlay. If so, then there are additional requirements that need to be shown, IE: shade calculations and a graphical schematic showing the shade per the requirements in the Sunshine Mile District document. Outline all Sunshine Mile District Requirements and show calculations for what is required and what has been provided to meet the standards.

5. The commercial rainwater harvesting linework is difficult to decipher on the planting plan. Provide a standalone detailed commercial rainwater harvesting plan. If a copy of an approved commercial rainwater harvesting plan is needed for reference, then please let me know and I will email an example.

6. GUIDANCE SUMMARY RELATED TO COMMENT ABOVE: On a separate plan, gray back the plant material; show a heavy dashed enclosed line that represents the subwatershed area (SW-#) (the subwatershed drainage area should include the water harvesting infiltration area (WHIA); use a narrower dashed enclosed line to depict the outline of the depressed landscape area (top contour and this area can be hatched if needed for clarity); include spot elevations for the top and bottom of WHIA; include grading flowlines; include downspouts, splashpads and scuppers clearly. The flowlines, elevations, downspouts, splashpads, scuppers and contouring should match the civil grading plan exactly. A good design rule: If the Water Harvest Infiltration Area and Plant Canopy square footage are similar and the Subwatershed (SW-#) is approximately 3 times the size of the Water Harvest Infiltration Area (WHIA), then the drainage scheme and calculation for the 50 percent will comply with the ordinance.

7. Include a typical note to see the civil grading plan for drainage scheme, hardscape and drainage structures related to commercial rainwater harvesting.

8. On all plan sheets within the development package include existing and future right-of-way lines and call them out. Also include existing and future sight visibility triangles.

9. Ensure that all of the Special Districts Review, Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are fully addressed.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
06/11/2026 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM:
Bobby Parsons
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
Development Package for Church Accessory Structures and Site Improvements – 446 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85719
Development Package (2nd Review)
TD-DEV-0125-00031

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6/11/2026
DUE DATE: 6/12/2026

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 21, 2026.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Follow up to previous comment 8: Clearly identify the proposed use of the accessory dwelling units (IE: clergy, homeless, residential care, etc.) so we can determine if the use is accessory to the religious use. A group dwelling is not an allowed use in the R-2 zone. Also, Sheet 3 calls out multifamily under the Waste Stream calculations. Please clarify.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Follow up to previous comment 9: As 12 units are proposed, please include the sf of each unit and include the bedroom count for each unit.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Follow up to previous comment 10: Sheet 2 calls out the new building as 1,685sf however Sheet 3 calls out the new building as 1,684sf. Please ensure the sf provided is consistent on each sheet. Also, the Sanctuary is 2,400sf, the church building is 6,282sf, and the new residential buildings are 1,685sf. These numbers total 10,385sf however you have not provided this total anywhere. Please explain the discrepancy.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Follow up to previous comment 13: As an easement is now shaded in on Sheet 2, please include the recordation information for this easement along with the width and purpose.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – Follow up to previous comment 15: As the 6 parcels are now proposed to become 1 lot, please provide the lot combination recordation information from Pima County.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – Follow up to previous comment 17: It is acknowledged the sight visibility triangle (SVT) has been shown for one of the entrances. Please show the existing and future SVT for the entrance to the ADA parking spaces.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Follow up to previous comment 19: Please clearly identify what the residential units will be used for as noted in comment 1. Based on the 7,967 sf provided, the required parking should be noted as 80 spaces if all the uses are accessory to the religious use. If this is a multiple use development where religious use is the principal land use, the total number of spaces required is the number required for the religious use or the sum of those required for other uses on the site, whichever is greater (UDC Table 7.4.4-1). Also, please ensure you address Site Engineering as it relates to the Arroyo Chico Wash. Per Chapter 16 of the city Code, no required improvements can be located within the erosion hazard setback including required parking. If the required minimum parking cannot be met for your proposed use, an Individual Parking Plan (IPP) can be applied for. Please reach out to Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have questions about the IPP. Ahttps://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19604

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Follow up to previous comment 20: As the proposed use of the residential units has not been clearly identified, the required short term and long term bicycle parking requirements may change once the use is called out. Please clearly provide the use of the residential units as noted in comment 1.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – Follow up to previous comment 21. Please include the recordation information for the easements along with the width and purpose.

06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Previous comment 22 not addressed. Please provide the information as noted by the standard above within the footprint of the building(s).

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S – Follow up to previous comment 24: Please address Right of Way Engineering comments as it relates to the standard above.

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T – Previous comment 25 not addressed. Please provide the information as noted by the standard above including locations of dumpsters fully dimensioned. Keynote 38 shows trash receptacles on the pedestrian sidewalk.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations***

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
05/21/2026 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
06/08/2026 Fire New Construction Standard REVIEW COMPLETED