Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0125-00031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Design Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/01/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good morning, Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0125-00031 for corrections. The attached document contains our requests. Thank you, David Wilging Planner I - Addressing Division Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-724-6381 |
||
| 12/02/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-0125-00031 Location: 446 S PLUMER AV Review Date: 12/2/2025 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0125-00031, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Provide the general note “The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.” Administrative Manual 2-06.4.7.B.1 3. Provide the general note “Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.” AM 2-06.4.7.B.3 4. Provide the general note “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” AM 2-06.4.7.C.2 5. Due to this development package being greater than one page, provide a sheet index. AM 2-06.3.12 6. Provide the page number and total number of pages within the DP (i.e., sheet xx of xx) AD 2-06.4.2. D 7. Provide a keynote for all the downspouts and sidewalk scuppers for all buildings to ensure that stormwater from roof drains, up to and including flow from the ten-year storm event, does not pass over sidewalks per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.3E. This includes existing structures. 8. Provide the Waste Stream Calculations for the entire site according to TSM 8-01.8.0. If the use of APCs is proposed/considered, it will require prior environmental services approval due to this being commercial development. 9. Show the 2-foot minimum grading setback from the property lines on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0 10. Provide site expansion calculations for the site. 11. Demonstrate how someone will get from the ADA parking space to the sidewalk. There is no ADA ramp shown by the ADA parking spaces. 12. Wheel stops will be required at all parking spaces adjacent to the sidewalks so as not to reduce the sidewalk path to less than 4 feet. UDC 7.4.6 This pertains to the ADA parking spaces along the south. 13. Provide a descriptor box adjacent to each basin on the site plan (Includes Stormwater Harvesting basins/landscaping). Include a leader arrow to the basin or provide a label for the basin and reference the label on the top of the descriptor box. Include the following applicable information in the descriptor box: a. Total volume, cubic feet or acre feet; b. If applicable, detention volume, cubic feet or acre feet; c. If applicable, retention volume, cubic feet; d. If applicable, first-flush retention volume, cubic feet; e. If applicable, Q100 in, cubic feet per second; f. If applicable, Q100 out, cubic feet per second; g. Basin top elevation, feet; h. 100-year water surface elevation, feet; and i. 100-year ponding depth, (measured from the lowest elevation of the basin), feet. DSSDR 11.1.3 14. The Arryo Chico wash runs along the northern portion of the site. It is required that the erosion hazard setback be shown on the site plan. Per chapter 26 of the City code, no required improvements can be located within the erosion hazard setback. Includes required parking. Section 26-8. & Section 26-8.b.(5) https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az/0-0-0-19604 15. The site plan and grading plan should be separated sheets to reduce the number of details cluttered onto the site plan. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/21/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added: ADDRESSING, TEP, ADOT, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to ADRESSING, TEP, ADOT, and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG. |
||
| 11/21/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 11/21/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 11/21/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 11/21/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED |