Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0125-00010
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 02/03/2025 | Site Landscape Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 02/12/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/03/2025 | NPPO Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO COMMENTS: 1. Upon review of aerial images of the site, it appears that protected native vegetation may be present on the site. Please provide a NPPP that shows preservation, transplant and mitigation for the protected native plants that may be disturbed/destroyed. If there are no viable protected native plants, or if there are native plants, but they won’t be disturbed, then please provide a NPPO Waiver for the project. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/30/2025 | ROW Engineering Review Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please refer to Attachment file - DP Site Development Elmwood_v1 - DTM Review Notes..pdf for DTM adjustment comments.. |
||
| 01/30/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show trash APC storage/screen location along with where they will be located for pick up service. 2. Show slopes on the sidewalk to show ADA compliance for the pedestrian circulation throughout the site. 3. The sidewalk should be located within the 24' ingress/egress easement and not on the individual lots. Revise as needed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/12/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Ramiro Olivarez PDSD: Zoning Review PROJECT: Minor Subdivision DP - 3934 E ELMWOOD ST | R-3 Zone Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0125-00010 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 12, 2024 DUE DATE: February 19, 2025 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 1. A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designed. 2. A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein. 3. Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule or as determined on an hourly rate. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 4. A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. See for reference, related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. Comment: Include a title block as noted in the Standard above. See for reference, related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. 6. A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. This map shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information; a. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area. Identify major streets within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. Section, township, and range, north arrow, and the scale will be labeled. Comment: Include the information as noted in the Standard above. See for reference, related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. 7. The north arrow, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. Comment: Include the information noted in the Standard above. See for reference, related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. 9. A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. Comment: Include a legend as noted in the Standard above. See for reference, related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. 10. An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. Comment: If additional sheets are needed due to review comments, please add a sheet index as noted in the Standard above. See for reference, related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. Comment: Include the information as noted by the Standard above. 2. The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The proposed name of the project, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant’s name. A brief legal description is to be provided. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Comment: Include the information as noted in the Standard above. Include relevant case number, Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. Comment: Include any related Design Development Option case numbers as noted by the Standard above. See related DDO comment below. GENERAL NOTES The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Comment: Clarify keynote 3. Aerial view does not depict any existing streets. 1. “Existing zoning is ____.” Comment: Revise note 2 to reflect “Existing zoning is ____.” Comment: List the required general notes as noted by the Standards below (2 - 6). See for reference, related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. 2. List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 3. Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. Floor area for each building. 5. Percentage of gross floor area, land area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included. 6. When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: 1. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Comment: The bearings and parcel dimensions do not match the bearings and parcel dimensions found in the related Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. 2. All existing easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Comment: The pedestrian circulation sidewalk is not located within the 24’ ingress/egress easement. Relocate the sidewalk within the 24’ ingress/egress easement. 3. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Comment: Include the information as noted by the Standard above. INFORMATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. Comment: Provide the easement recordation information as noted by the Standard above. 7. Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). Comment: Include the height of the buildings within the building footprint as noted by the Standard above. Comment: A Design Development Option will be required for the north and south building setbacks. (Two DDO’s total for lot 2) In the R-3 zone, residential use adjacent to residential zone the setbacks are 6’ or 2/3 (H) of the wall, whichever is greater. Per the model plan uploaded, the height of the walls measured from design grade to the top of the parapet is 12’6”. 2/3 of 12’6” = 8.33-foot minimum setback. For LOT 2, the north and south building setbacks depicted are 6’8” and does not comply with the 8.33-foot minimum setback. Per UDC 6.3-2.A, the minimum perimeter yard setback is the greater of 6’-0” or 2/3 (H) height of the exterior wall. The structure encroaches into the required perimeter yards and will require the approval of a Design Development Option (DDO) before zoning can approve this permit. The below paperwork can be filled out and submitted with the next submission. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf For more information about the DDO process contact Mark Castro at mark.castro@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov Comment: A Design Development Option will be required for the north and south building setbacks. (Two DDO’s total for lot 3) In the R-3 zone, residential use adjacent to residential zone the setbacks are 6’ or 2/3 (H) of the wall, whichever is greater. Per the model plan uploaded, the height of the walls measured from design grade to the top of the parapet is 12’6”. 2/3 of 12’6” = 8.33-foot minimum setback. For LOT 3, the north building setback depicted is 6’8” and south building setback depicted is 6’9” and does not comply with the 8.33-foot minimum setback. Per UDC 6.3-2.A, the minimum perimeter yard setback is the greater of 6’-0” or 2/3 (H) height of the exterior wall. The structure encroaches into the required perimeter yards and will require the approval of a Design Development Option (DDO) before zoning can approve this permit. The below paperwork can be filled out and submitted with the next submission. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf For more information about the DDO process contact Mark Castro at mark.castro@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov 8. Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Comment: The sidewalk should be located within the 24' ingress/egress easement and not on the individual lots. Correct the sidewalk to not be within the 24’ ingress/egress easement. 10. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. Comment: Indicate trash APC storage/screen location along with where they will be located for pickup service. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A corrected development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro Olivarez at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/15/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/28/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing, and TEP to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing, and TEP. | ||
| 02/12/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good morning, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0125-00010. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager II – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 02/05/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to review development plans for TD-DEV-0125-00010. Upon review, Tucson Electric Power has no objections, and no conflicts are to be expected. |
||
| 02/11/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/23/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/22/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/03/2025 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |