Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0124-00025
Parcel: 137276290

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0124-00025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/28/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) APPROVED February 28, 2024 WO#T103941 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Desert Dove Apartments TD-DEV-0124-00025 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 2/5/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are depicted upon the plan; however, there do not appear to be any apparent conflicts at this time. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our land Resources Department, TEPDEVREV@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Fred Quintero (520) 235-6329 fquintero@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power
03/14/2024 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
03/13/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system and will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality as well as a building permit from the City of Tucson. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code.
3. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required at the water meter for buildings that have three or more stories or are greater than 34-feet in height as measured from the service level. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/city-services/tucson-water/water-quality/documents/backflow-ordinance.pdf
4. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH#1, 2460.91’) is less than 12” lower than the first floor elevation (2461.80’) of one of the buildings. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Floors discharging from a floor level that is more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Building sewers smaller than 8-inches shall have cleanouts located at intervals of not more than 100-feet of developed pipe length (i.e. the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout to the next cleanout). Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018.
03/14/2024 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Good afternoon,
Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-0124-00025 Desert Dove Apartments for corrections. Please see the attached document for comments.
Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
02/26/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority REQUIRES RESUBMIT February 26, 2024
Planning and Development Services
City of Tucson
201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701
RE: TD-DEV-0124-00025, Construction of 64 new apartment units on a common site with adjacent existing church / 6163 S Midvale Rd, Tucson, AZ. 85756, Received February 5, 2024
To whom this may concern,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0124-00025, a development plan for the development of new apartment buildings at 6163 South Midvale Park Road. This development is located in the N.W. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 10, Township 15S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 137-27-6290, covers approximately 5 ± acres, and is zoned as Residence 2 Zoning (R-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is South Wilmot Road and East Littletown Road, approximately 1370 feet
to the northwest of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and
public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.
The Tucson Airport Authority is requiring a resubmit of this project. These conditions must be included in the plan documents and shall be identified in the general notes section of all future plans submitted to the City of Tucson for review.
Conditions of approval:
1. “According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, no Notice
Criteria are exceeded. Applicants are therefore not required to file FAA Form 7460.
However, if the use of cranes is anticipated during development and construction
activities, the applicant must file FAA Form 7460 at least 45 days in advance of such
use, to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns identified by the FAA. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp.”
Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the applicant add the following notes into the general notes of the revised development plan. This project is located approximately 2 miles northwest of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport.
The proposed notes would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through the property owner recording the Avigation Easement and providing the
Airport Disclosure Statement to the new residents of all residential uses. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson – Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4).
1. "That prior to the City's approval of the proposed development, the property owner must record the Avigation Easement that discloses the existence and operational
characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.”
The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner must complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder’s Office. Then send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.
Scott Robidoux
Manager of Planning
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Blvd, Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756”
2. Applicable to residential uses only
“The property owner/developer/applicant must provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit must be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.”
The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the Scott Robidoux mailing address provided above.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520- 573-4811.
Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, C.M.
Manager of Planning
03/01/2024 Fire New Construction REQUIRES RESUBMIT -Could not locate all the underground fire service lines on the utility plan. Call out all fire lines to all buildings.
-Show all existing and new fire hydrants with measurements to all buildings. Hydrants shall be within 600' from the fire apparatus access road to the furthest portions of the buildings, IFC 507.5.1
-Provide the type of construction and square footage of each building. This will impact the number of fire hydrants required. IFC appendix B, Table 105.1(2)
john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581
02/28/2024 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT See landscape comments.
03/11/2024 ROW Engineering Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-0124-00025
6163 S. Midvale Rd.

Comments:
1. On the demolition plan, Sheet C2.1 and Reference Note No. 12, the existing Light Pole on Midvale is mentioned. The note (No. 12) states, “Refer to Electrical Plans.” The Electrical Plans were not included in this DP submittal. This Light Pole is in the area of the new entrance off of Midvale Rd and must be relocated. Please show on the plan (preferable the Site Plan, C3.1) where this light pole is going to be relocated to.

David Stiffey
DTM Project Coordinator
David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov
03/07/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview
The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
TD-DEV-0124-00025
1. The site is located in a balanced basin and requires balanced basin detention compliant with Chapter 3 of the DSSDR. Table 1 indicates that the peak discharges for all storm events are significantly increased post-development compared to pre-development. The 2-, 10-, and 100- year storm event peak discharge must be the same or reduced post-development compared pre-development. This requirement is met in the PC-LID spreadsheet. Please remove the contradictory information in Table 1 and in the PC-Hydro sheets.
2. Show that sidewalks in front of parking spaces maintain a minimum 4 foot unobstructed width per TSM 7-01.4.3 A. The parking spots must have wheel stops or the sidewalk must be 6.5 feet in total width to ensure that vehicles do not obstruct the 4 foot width.

Lianne Evans
lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov
02/28/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0124-00025
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 6163 S MIDVALE PARK RD/137-27-6290
ZONING: R-2

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.

COMMENTS:
1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments.
2. Please revise the NPPP. There are a number of plants missing from the inventory that based on the aerial look like native plants.
3. Please label all existing and future rights of way for all streets. 7.6.4.C.2.a. on all sheets
4. Show all site visibility triangles on plan set sheets.
5. Add spot elevations to all basins on the landscape sheets.
6. A separate dedicated water meter will be needed for irrigation. Please show that on the plan set. TSM 4-01.6.1.A.1.
7. Include a root barrier detail for trees located near asphalt or sidewalk.
8. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must match the Grading Plan.
9. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. Then revise the Site Water Budget table to reflect these changes.
10. Include spot grade on the CRWH Plan.TSM 4-01.4.3.2C 3a-iii
11. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans.
12. 20% commercial rainwater harvesting on site doesn’t meet the 50% requirement of the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance. Please work with the Engineering firm to resolve this issue or reach out to the below to work out a solution that will meet the intent of this ordinance.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov
03/04/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Desert Dove Apartments
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0124-00025

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2024

DUE DATE: March 9, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 30, 2025.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Geotech listed on sheet 1.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets of the DP.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0124-00025, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - The scale will be labeled on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Church is not a use as classified in the UDC. Also, review UDC Table 4.8-2 and provide all applicable Use Specific Standards.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Clarify if the daycare use listed is only daycare for church services or if this is a daycare that operates all week for people outside of church services. If this is a daycare for people outside of the church services provide the number of children it services and demonstrate how the Use Specific Standards have been met.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Midvale Park is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of :UDC Article 6.4.3. Per discussions with the COT PDSD Zoning Administrator, Elisa Hamblin, the lot coverage calculation shall be based on the most restrictive percentage, 60%, for the religious use for the entire site.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 If an expansion is 25% or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a 25% or greater expansion in floor area , the requirements of this section apply to the entire site. As the proposed multifamily exceeds the 25% expansion provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area including the existing vehicle use area on site. Clearly demonstrate that all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6 are met for the existing vehicle use area.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 10 is addressed vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The use listed under “PARKING CALCULATION” is not a use as classified in the UDC. Revise the use.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking requirements shown under “PARKING CALCULATION” is not correct. Review 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Table 1106.1 and provide a correct calculation.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.1 & 7.4.12 are met.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Under “ZONING & LAND USE NOTE” 12 you list “ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003”. The reference to “2003” is incorrect and should be 2009.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until comment 10 is addressed bicycle parking requirements cannot be verified.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 If an expansion is 25% or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a 25% or greater expansion in floor area , the requirements of this section apply to the entire site. As the proposed multifamily exceeds the 25% expansion. The bicycle parking calculation shall include the existing uses on the site. Also clearly demonstrate that all existing bicycle parking meets current code.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Article 7.4.3.G When the calculation of required motor vehicle , bicycle parking spaces , and EVSE spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said, the short-term required number of 12.8 should be 13.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Under the “PROVIDED: LONG-TERM:” you state “(1 IN EACH DWELLING UNIT0” but under “ZONING & LAND USE NOTE” 14 you state “32 CABINETS WILL ACCOMMODATE 64 LONG TERM BIKE PARKING” & on sheet 15 you provided a bicycle locker detail. Clarify how you intend to provide the long-term bicycle parking requirement.

20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Sheet 6 “REFERENCE NOTE” 18 refers to “BIKE RACK REFER TO LANDSPACING PLANS” but no details have been provided on the landscape plans. Provide a short-term bicycle parking detail that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle locations shown on sheet 6 do not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.d.

22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Under site data “EAST AND SOUTH P/L: clarify what the “2.25” represents. Also until comment 26 is addressed Zoning cannot determine required perimeter yard setbacks to the east and south.

23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.2.B.2 If the expansion is 25% or more, these provisions apply to the existing use or structure, as well as the expansion. That said clearly demonstrate how the requires of TSM 7-01 are met for the entire site.

25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Sheet 6 “CONSTRUCTION NOTE” 7 references ‘WITDH PER PLAN” but know widths were provided.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As parking vehicles are allowed to overhang proposed sidewalks clearly demonstrate that a parking vehicle will not reduce the sidewalk the sidewalk width to less than 4’-0” .

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
01/31/2024 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
02/05/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED Addressing review required per SOP. Review request email sent per ADOT,TAA and TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG.
02/23/2024 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED Good Afternoon, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review.
02/05/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
02/05/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
02/05/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
02/05/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
02/01/2024 OK to Submit - Landscape Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
02/01/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED