Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0124-00025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 06/11/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | APPROVED | Good morning, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0124-00025. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 05/06/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | APPROVED | May 6, 2024 Planning and Development Services City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: TD-DEV-0124-00025, 2 nd Submittal, Construction of 64 new apartment units on a common site with adjacent existing church / 6163 S Midvale Rd, Tucson, AZ. 85756, Received April 8, 2024 To whom this may concern, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-0124-00025, 2 nd submittal, a development plan for the development of new apartment buildings at 6163 South Midvale Park Road. This development is located in the N.W. quarter of the S.E. quarter of Section 10, Township 15S, Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number 137-27-6290, covers approximately 5 ± acres, and is zoned as Residence 2 Zoning (R-2). The nearest major roadway intersection is South Commerce Court and South Bufkin Drive, approximately 300 feet to the northwest of the subject development. This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the proposed project and is not requiring a resubmittal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning | ||
| 05/03/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/08/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 06/11/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/22/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please see Site Landscape comments. Thank you, Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/22/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF 64 NEW APARTMENT UNITS ON A COMMON SITE WITH ADJACENT EXISTING CHURCH ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0124-00025/137276290 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 6175 S MIDVALE PARK RD CURRENT ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL COMMENTS: THE REVISIONS MADE PER MATT CARLTON’S COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE FOLLOWING (3): 1. Previous Comment: Include spot grades on the CRWH Plan. TSM 4-01.4.3.2C 3A-iii. Add to key note number 6 on sheet WH1.01 (see civil sheets for elevations). 2. Previous Comment: Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. Add the concrete splash block callout leader note to all locations on site or add the splash block symbol to the key and call it out there. 3. On the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plans, show flow arrows at the downspouts, or is the rainwater flowing straight off the roof onto the concrete sidewalk/concrete patios? NEW SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO COMMENTS: 4. Ensure that Zoning comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 5. Update/Change Tucson Land Use Code (LUC) references to the Unified Development code (UDC) and its corresponding code reference number on all applicable plan sheets. 6. Identify the site monitor and list contact information on the NPPO sheet. See UDC 7.7.5. 7. There is landscape and irrigation located in the ROW at the southwest entry. A permit is required from the Department of Transit and Mobility for any planting or irrigation being done in the ROW. Please reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov) if this is the case. 8. The street landscape border along S Midvale Park Rd is 185 linear feet and requires 5.6 trees, rounded up to 6 total trees required. Please add a street landscape border tree and update all calculations and schedules accordingly. See UDC 7.6.4 Landscape Border requirements. 9. Please label irrigation meter as “irrigation only”. See TSM 4-01.6.0 10. Update the bar scale on the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting sheet WH1.01 to match the scale on WH1.02 If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/08/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Desert Dove Apartments Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0124-00025 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 8, 2024 DUE DATE: May 8, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 30, 2025. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not fully addressed. No case number was provided on sheet C1.3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0124-00025, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the Use Specific Standards for a religious use in the R-2 zone. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Church is not a use as classified in the UDC. Also, review UDC Table 4.8-2 and provide all applicable Use Specific Standards. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. This comment was not fully addressed and has nothing to do with the vehicle parking space calculation as stated in your comment response. The following still needs to be addressed for the exiting vehicle use area: a. The 15’ deep vehicle parking spaces shown do not meet the minimum 15’-6” requirement. Minimum space depth is 18’ minus 2’-6 “ for vehicle overhang, UDC Figure 7.4.6-A and Article 7.4.6.H.3. b. Along the center island of existing parking no space depth dimension was provided for the southwest parking area. c. It is not clear how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met for the areas along the north and northeast side of the existing vehicle use area, the northeast access lane off of Bufkin, landscape areas around the center island of vehicle parking and the landscape island at the east end of the southern most angled parking. d. Provide a width dimension for what appears to be a drop off lane near the northeast side of the existing 3,511 sq. ft. religious use building. e. Provide a width dimension for what appears to be a two-way access lane northeast of the drop off lane mentioned above. f. Provide the angle of the existing angled parking. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 If an expansion is 25% or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a 25% or greater expansion in floor area , the requirements of this section apply to the entire site. As the proposed multifamily exceeds the 25% expansion provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area including the existing vehicle use area on site. Clearly demonstrate that all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6 are met for the existing vehicle use area. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Following discussion with the Zoning Administrator it has been determined that the vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. As religious use is no longer the principal land use vehicle parking must be provided for all uses on the site. Based on your response to prior comment 7, “The daycare is an all-week facility and separate from the church” the required number of vehicle parking spaces shall include the religious use, multifamily and daycare requriemetns. Clarify how the required number of religious parking spaces is 28 when there is 5,011 sq. ft. of religious use shown on the plan. 5. This comment was not addressed the calculation still shows “CHURCH”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The use listed under “PARKING CALCULATION” is not a use as classified in the UDC. Revise the use. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 04/08/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/08/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED |