Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0124-00025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/03/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please see Site Landscape comments. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/03/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA PDSD LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF 64 NEW APARTMENT UNITS ON A COMMON SITE WITH ADJACENT EXISTING CHURCH ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0124-00025/137276290 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 6175 S MIDVALE PARK RD CURRENT ZONING: R-2 RESIDENCE ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments are addressed. Site Landscape/NPPO Review Section Comments: 1. A response to comments letter was not provided for the previous landscape comments made on 5/22/24. Please revise the plans and provide a comment response letter that explains how all of the comments were addressed. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/03/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Desert Dove Apartments Development Package (3rd Review) TD-DEV-0124-00025 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 3, 2024 DUE DATE: July 12, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 30, 2025. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. This comment was not fully addressed and has nothing to do with the vehicle parking space calculation as stated in your comment response. The following still needs to be addressed for the exiting vehicle use area: a. Until the PDMR is approved Zoning cannot approve this plan. The 15’ deep vehicle parking spaces shown do not meet the minimum 15’-6” requirement. Minimum space depth is 18’ minus 2’-6 “ for vehicle overhang, UDC Figure 7.4.6-A and Article 7.4.6.H.3. b. Zoning acknowledges that you are proposing boulders to meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. Zoning was not able to find a distance between boulders on the landscape plans. Also, detail 5 sheet LL2.-1 shows a distance of 6’-0” minimum for face of curb. Clearly show the boulders on sheet C3.1 and provide the proposed distance between the boulders and a dimension from the edge of pavement. The distance from edge of pave shall be 2’-6” max and not less than 2’ and the boulders need to be a minimum 6” high. Also, there is an area just south of the basin located in the northern most corner of the site that no barrier has been provided. It is not clear how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met for the areas along the north and northeast side of the existing vehicle use area, the northeast access lane off of Bufkin, landscape areas around the center island of vehicle parking and the landscape island at the east end of the southern most angled parking. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.2 If an expansion is 25% or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a 25% or greater expansion in floor area , the requirements of this section apply to the entire site. As the proposed multifamily exceeds the 25% expansion provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area including the existing vehicle use area on site. Clearly demonstrate that all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6 are met for the existing vehicle use area. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 07/09/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Revise DP per Zoning Comments and resubmit | ||
| 07/08/2024 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Zoning does not have an issue with what is being requested with this PDMR. However the request must be shown on an accompanied site plan for approval. | ||
| 06/18/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |