Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0124-00022
Parcel: 12618138A

Address:
4151 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0124-00022
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/06/2024 External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation APPROVED Approved TD-DEV-0124-00022 4151 E 22ND ST TUCSON, AZ 85711 City of Tucson Parks and Recreation has no additional requirements for the Development Plan. Regards, Joe Barr Project Manager Tucson Parks and Recreation
03/13/2024 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing APPROVED Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-0124-00022. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623
03/14/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) APPROVED March 14, 2024
WO#T104411
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Service
CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: Multifamily residential project - TD-DEV-0124-00022
TD-DEV-0124-00022
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 2/6/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are
not depicted upon the plan. There are possible conflicts with a pole line north of the
development.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our land Resources Department,
TEPDEVREV@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Martin Salazar
(520) 305-6713
msalazar@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
02/28/2024 NPPO APPROVED
03/11/2024 ROW Engineering Review APPROVED No Comments

David Stiffey

David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov
03/14/2024 CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
03/11/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2589-05, 2530.08’) is higher than the first floor elevation (2528.5’) of the proposed dwelling units. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of backwater valves when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
03/05/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview
The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf
TD-DEV-0124-00022
1. Provide a figure in the drainage report that shows the location of each basin, A-J, and labels them clearly.
2. Provide a table similar to Table 2.3 in the DSSDR that shows the volume of each basin and how much retention it contributes.
3. A lot combination will be required to combine the three lots of the development into one.
4. Provide back-up spurs at the ends of the rows of parking that do not provide ingress or egress. Back-up spurs must be a minimum of three feet in depth and have a three-foot radii as well as a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas.

Lianne Evans
lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov
02/28/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-0124-00022
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 4151 E 22ND ST/126-18-138A
ZONING: CO-3

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.

COMMENTS:
1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments.
2. Please label all existing and future rights of way for all streets. 7.6.4.C.2.a. on all sheets
3. Show all site visibility triangles on plan set sheets.
4. The street landscape border is missing a 30” screen. Is this requirement being satisfied with a vegeatative screen or by a block wall? If using walls as your table says, please label them on the planset.
5. There will need to be a interior landscape border on the north & west sides of the site per UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1. See UDC 7.6.4.C for landscape border requirements. You can also apply for a DDO.
6. A separate dedicated water meter will be needed for irrigation. Please show that on the plan set.
7. Include a root barrier detail for trees located near asphalt or sidewalk.
8. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must match the Grading Plan.
9. The commercial rainwater harvesting plan is missing the site water budget. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must utilize the Site Water Budget (located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Building-Safety/Water-Energy-Conservation). See TSM 4-01.0.0 Exhibit A. The Site Water Budget is how the Water Dept tracks the irrigation water use on-site, not first flush retention volume charts.
10. Area in the ROW cannot be considered as part of the SWA. Please revise subwatershed areas 8A & 9A
11. Clearly show where the basins are on the commercial rainwater harvesting plan and include spot grades on them.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
02/29/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Wyatt Berger
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 4151 East 22nd Street
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0124-00022

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 29, 2024

DUE DATE: March 7, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and the Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is March 1, 2025.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0124-00022, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

4.7 General Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Remove the reference to use-specific standard 4.9.7.B.6 on the cover sheet as this standard does not apply to Multifamily Development within the O-3 zone.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As 22nd Street is an arterial identified on the Major Streets and Routes Plan Map, provide a general note stating “This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of UDC 5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R).”

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will be applied for, provide on the cover sheet a statement that the project meets the conditions of the application, what the was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Per UDC Table 6.3-3.A, there is no maximum lot coverage for nonresidential uses within the O-3 zone. Clarify whether the lot coverage calculation provided for “parking spaces” includes the entire vehicular use area (see UDC 6.4.3.B.3.b for specifics).

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Ensure all easements are depicted on the site plan. Additionally, provide the recordation information and purpose of the six-foot-wide utility easement shown on the site plan. If this easement is to be abandoned, provide the abandonment information.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Ensure the right-of-way width and recordation data for all adjacent rights-of-way are provided on the development package drawings. The right-of-way width of 22nd Street at this segment is 185’.

2-06.4.9 Information on Proposed Development

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – Zoning acknowledges a request to consolidate Pima County Tax Parcel Numbers 126-18-138A, -139A, and -140A has been received by the Pima County Assessor’s Office. Provide an approved lot consolidation request with the next submittal.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – The zoning classification to the west of the site is incorrectly labeled on the development package drawings and should be listed as R-2.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide back-up spurs at the ends of the rows of parking that do not provide ingress or egress. Back-up spurs must be a minimum of three feet in depth and have a three-foot radii as well as a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Ensure that the west back-up spur provides a minimum distance of three feet between the back of spur and the 30” screen wall.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Table 7.4.4-1, 26 motor vehicle parking spaces are required for the proposed development. Further, per UDC Table 7.4.11-1, five EV capable and three EV ready spaces are required for the proposed development.

Four “EV stalls” that are otherwise required are proposed to eliminate four motor vehicle parking spaces. In addition to the eight EV spaces required, six additional EV ready and/or installed spaces would be required to reduce the total parking provided to twenty spaces. Additional non-required short-term bicycle parking cannot be used to reduce the required number of motor vehicle parking spaces based on UDC 7.4.5.F.1.b.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Note that based on the above comment, the additional bicycle parking spaces provided beyond the minimum requirement cannot be used to reduce the number of the motor vehicle parking spaces.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The cover sheet indicates that twenty short-term bicycle parking spaces are proposed, while only sixteen spaces are shown on the site plan. Clarify the discrepancy.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate compliance with UDC 7.4.9.B.1.e. Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required setback as measured from the south lot line is listed incorrectly. Per UDC 6.4.5.C.2.a, for nonresidential and multifamily development abutting an arterial or collector street, the minimum required street perimeter yard is ten feet, as measured from the existing or future property line as determined by the Major Streets and Routes Plan, whichever is greater.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – General Note 12 indicates that the maximum allowable building height is 25’. Per UDC Table 6.3-3.A, for nonresidential uses, the maximum permitted height is 40’.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – General Note 22 on the cover sheet indicates “postal service delivery shall be within the buildings.” Keynote 39 states “new gang mailbox” that could not be located on the site plan. Clarify the mail service location.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
01/29/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
02/06/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator REVIEW COMPLETED Addressing review required per SOP. Review request email sent per TEP & Parks&Rec. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG.
02/06/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
02/06/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
02/06/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required from the customer at this time.
02/29/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
02/05/2024 OK to Submit - Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED
01/30/2024 OK to Submit - Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED
02/01/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED
03/11/2024 Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED No Comments

David Stiffey

David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov