Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0123-00119
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/03/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 05/31/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/21/2023 | Entitlements | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | A letter of recommendation from the Bridges PAD DRC (Design Review Committee) is required with submittal. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/plans/Bridges_PAD_Amendment-MayorCouncil-May_2018.pdf Per adopted Bridges PAD, page 108, Section C.6: Prior to the submittal of any development plan or subdivision plat to the City of Tucson, the Developer must procure a letter of recommendation from the DRC for submittal to the City. This letter, and a record copy (for the City’s archives) of the materials recommended by the DRC, must accompany any City submittal in order to allow review of same by the City of Tucson Planning & Development Services Department. | ||
| 05/17/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Please clarify the lot line on the plans splitting the parcel. I couldn’t find any documentation for the lot split and explain why it is being drawn down the middle of the access drive. 2. Please clarify the first flush retention solution. The calculated required volume is 592 cu ft and the report claims the site is achieving 600 cu ft but the grading plan labels the two water harvesting basins providing 310 cf of volume and 229 cf of volume which don’t add up to 600. 3. Per the retention/detention manual section 2.2.3 – “The total first-flush retention volume provided in each developed watershed shall satisfy the first-flush retention requirement for that watershed.” The entire eastern onsite watershed doesn’t seem to have any retention capture. Revise as needed. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/18/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Take Five @ The Bridges Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0123-00119 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 18, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 31, 2024. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS This comment is still applicable a reduced-scale map of the entire pad is required. Zoning acknowledges that on the location map the PAD is called out, but a map of the pad will be required. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – As this site is within PAD-15, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes This comment is still applicable: :Automotive Service and Repair subjection to section 3.5.4.2.C and D 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use specific standards listed under Zoning and Land Use Note 4 in not correct. Review PAD-15 Section C.2.2.B.2 and provide the correct standards. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. This comment is still applicable: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The provided vehicle parking space calculation under the Development Standards Table and the tracking table are not correct. Review PAD-15 Section C.2.2.C.4 and provide a correct calculation. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly show and full dimension all landings on all proposed ramps so that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 405.7 can be verified. 5. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the required Design Review approval letter with your next submittal, see PAD-15 Section C.6. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 04/20/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |