Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0123-00097
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/22/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Access is required for a backwater valve so you cannot locate it at the sewer tap. [Initial comment: The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (9784-09, 2329.32’) is higher than the first floor elevation (2328.10’). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.] | ||
| 06/20/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Hello, ES Comments are as follows: No detailed drawings of enclosures included within the DP. This was also noted in the 1st submittal review comments…No enclosure detail provided. Include detail drawings of enclosure with dimensions. TSM 8-01.4.A & 8-01.5.2. Refer to TSM 8-01.9.0, figure 3B, single container enclosure. Provide detail drawing of enclosure fully dimensioned. All other conditions are met and acceptable. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
||
| 05/31/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See landscape comments | ||
| 06/06/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Comment 4 was not completely addressed, provide either reference to TSM 8-01.9 Figure 3, or include a detail showing compliance with TSM 8-01 Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/31/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Salad and Go ACTIVITY NO: DEV-0123-00097 Address/Parcel: 105-13-053A Zoning: C-1 Existing Use: disturbed vacant land Proposed Use: Food Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31, 2023 DUE DATE: 21 days from above date COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Engineer & LA comment – This comment was not sufficiently addressed - The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. Basin slopes require labels/contours. 2. Engineer & LA comment - This comment was not sufficiently addressed - Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. The landscape borders do not have 50% coverage. 4. This comment was not sufficiently addressed - Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 5. This comment was not sufficiently addressed - Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 6. This comment was not sufficiently addressed - Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barriers adjacent to walkways. 7. There are a number of trees not inventoried on the site. All trees should be inventoried if native, if not, label on the plan. Per the on-site field visit conducted on June 21, 2023, most trees are viable, but not transplantable, meaning they require mitigation if removed. 8. This comment was not sufficiently addressed - Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Tucson Development Center https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/21/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 4137 N 1ST AV Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-0123-00097 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 21, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 9 , 2024 . SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) As there are changes to the site, these changes will required PDP modification 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description This comment is still applicable please provide the information for all sheets 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - Provide a brief legal description on the title block as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). This comment is still applicable please provide the information for all sheets 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This comment is still applicable please provide the information for all sheets 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0123-00097 and street address , adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label Wetmore rd as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide the rezoning case number, and provide any conditions of the rezoning. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. This comment is still applicable, Per UDC section 7.4.6.H.1. “Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines , to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping , walls, or buildings , overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas , and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site .” 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - It is acknowledged that there is a parking detail on sheet C700 but please provide dimension and provide a detail for the regular parking spaces with dimensions. 7.COMMENT: The parking calculation call out for 9 provided parking spots, Please provide dimension for the parking spot on the north east. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarify the location of the long term bicycle parking 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. This comment is still applicable “the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - Provide the information noted by the standard,” 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. This comment is still applicable, show the required setback from the future property line since dedication is being proposed on this site. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Provide the being setback as noted by the standard above. Show the required and the proposed setback. For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting an Arterial or Collector Street the minimum required street perimeter yard is ten feet, as measured from the existing or future property line as determined by the adopted Major Streets and Routes Plan , whichever is greater. For nonresidential and multifamily development abutting a Local Street : the minimum required street perimeter yard is 20 feet, as measured from the street property line . 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. This comment is still applicable “sidewalks or crosswalks cannot cross any type of stacking areas for drive-through lanes” 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Pedestrian circulation to the collection areas will be required. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U - Provide the information noted by the standard above. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 05/22/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/16/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | A PIA has been initiated for this project. TR-PIA-0423-00015 | ||
| 06/16/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | A PIA has been initiated for this project. TR-PIA-0423-00015 |