Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-0123-00097
Parcel: 10513053A

Address:
4137 N 1ST AV

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-0123-00097
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/15/2023 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing APPROVED Good morning,

This project does not require review by Pima County Addressing. The applicant will need to decide on an address between 4137 N 1st AV and 698 E Limberlost DR.

Thank you

Nicholas Jordan
Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
02/15/2023 Design Review NOT REQUIRED Historic review not required.
03/03/2023 Entitlements NOT REQUIRED
04/04/2023 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
02/07/2023 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (9784-09, 2329.32’) is higher than the first floor elevation (2328.10’). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet of developed pipe length. Reference Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018.
3. Pima County Wastewater Reclamation Detail RWRD 401 requires the installation of a 4” riser and cleanout to grade 12” from the property line (i.e. prior to entering the right of way).
02/16/2023 External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services REQUIRES RESUBMIT RE: Due: 2/8/2023- Development Package-1st submittal review-TD-DEV-0123-00097

Andy Vera
CDRC
Pat Tapia
ES review comments as follows:

Must include provisions for both trash and recycle storage and collection. Refer to TSM 8-01.1.0. Current drawing proposes one single enclosure at the SW corner of the building/development. Either add another single enclosure next to the current proposed or design for one double container enclosure. Refer to TSM 8-01.9.0, figure 3A or 3B.
No enclosure detail provided. Include detail drawings of enclosure with dimensions. TSM 8-01.4.A & 8-01.5.2
Depict 14’x40’ approach in front of enclosure. TSM 8-01.5.3.B, and include turning radii for service vehicle ingress, circulation within development, through egress.
TSM 8-01.5.3.E

Please feel free to contact me regarding this review.

Thanks,
Andy Vera
City of Tucson -Environmental Services
Accounts Representative Supervisor
(520) 837-3798
02/09/2023 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT See comments for Site Landscape
02/24/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. A pedestrian circulation path is required out to both Limberlost and 1st, as well as out to the waste enclosure. Pedestrian circulation cannot be directed through drive-thru stacking lanes (TSM 7-01)
2. Due to differences between submitted development package and rezoning PDP from case C9-19-03, engineering approval will depend on entitlements approval
3. Include SWH basin grate elevation on grading plan
4. Include a callout and detail of the waste enclosure compliant with TSM 8-01.9 Figure 3
5. A 6' sidewalk will be required along N 1st Avenue, connecting to the existing sidewalk on Limberlost Dr (TSM 10-01.3.3)
6. Provide a waste stream calculation compliant with TSM 8-01
7. Inlet pipes of detention basins must be a minimum of 12" (COT Ret/Det manual)
8. Callout the size of the underground basin outlet pipe on the drainage plan
9. Show how the pertinent requirements of the COT retention/detention manual for underground storage (Chapter 4.13) are followed:

a. As per the updated Detention/Retention manual 4.13.1.4, show how 150% of the required 100-yr detention volume is provided in the site drainage improvements. Looks like this section is still being completed. Note: 50% of the volume can be provided on the surface if needed
b. Include a note in the plan set requiring a maintenance schedule and process that follows the manufacturer's recommendations.
c. As per the Detention/Retention Manual 4.13.1.5, include an inspection and maintenance port into each chamber
d. Show how flow will be safely discharged when the storage capacity is exceeded through use of an overflow outlet (Detention/Retention Manual 4.13.1.6)
e. As per the detention/retention manual 4.13.1.7, process a covenant agreement for this project, a sample can be found at:

https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-appendix-g.pdf
f. Provide a report from an engineer registered in Arizona showing adequacy of the load bearing capacity of the underlying soils, as well as providing appropriate building setbacks and design details associated with the structural integrity of the system and surrounding site features (Detention/Retention Manual 4.13.1.8)

Scott Haseman
scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov
02/09/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: Salad and Go
ACTIVITY NO: DEV-0123-00097
Address/Parcel: 105-13-053A
Zoning: C-1
Existing Use: disturbed vacant land
Proposed Use: Food Service

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 9, 2023
DUE DATE: February 7, 2023
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
1. The landscape, irrigation and water harvesting plans need to show the entire project, the drive along 1st Ave is missing. Landscape borders are required along the entire length of the project, both on Limberlost and 1st Ave.
2. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required to maximize water collection and retention, which has not been achieved. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening.
3. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes.
4. Engineer & LA comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf
COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf
5. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. Show how First Flush Volumes relate to plant water demands.
6. Engineer & LA comment The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation.
a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible.
b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas.
c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas.
d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained.
e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations.
f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements.
7. Engineer & LA comment - The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match.
8. Engineer & LA comment - Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans.
9. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. The landscape borders do not have 50% coverage.
10. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a.
11. Table 7.6.4-1- Requires 30” screen adjacent to parking areas along MS&R streets, 5’ screen along non-MS&R streets, adjacent to residential or office uses, a 5’ wall is required.
12. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g.
13. Add rezoning case # to title page as well as the required conditions.
14. Engineer & LA comment – a wall detail is required that meets the rezoning condition, “see architecture plans” is not sufficient.
15. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2
16. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A.
17. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways.
18. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9., please be specific.
19. Viability is completely different than transplantability or salvagability. Please revise plans/legend to include viability in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0. Please note that Mesquite hybrids will be considered native trees, and should be included in NPP inventory UDC 7.7.6.
20. Mitigation calculations are not provided. Provide a narrative that explains why no trees are to left in place as the Code requires that the highest value of resources be protected in place (specifically in the areas of the densest vegetation. UDC 7.7.1.D. Please note that mitigation trees are in addition to other required trees.
21. Please provide a summary of quantities of all inventoried, mitigation and TOS plants in a manner that makes it simple to cross check between landscape and NPP plans.
22. The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss.
23. Please identify the project monitor prior to any grading activities, UDC 7.7.5. On-monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre . The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Tucson Development Center
https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
02/09/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Paul Camarena
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: 4137 N 1ST AV
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-0123-00097

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 9, 2023



COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 9 , 2024 .

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)


It is acknowledged that there a demolition sheet, please remove or add for reference only on the sheet.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 - Provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 - Provide the information noted by the standard above.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS



2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:


2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - Provide a brief legal description on the title block as noted by the standard above.



2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0123-00097 and street address , adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - For comment 6-9 provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A - For comment 6-9 provide the information noted by the standard above.



2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - For comment 6-9 provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - For comment 6-9 provide the information noted by the standard above.





2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes




2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Provide the information noted by the standard above.



2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide the rezoning case number, and provide any conditions of the rezoning.


2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As 1st AV is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R map, provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”





2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:



2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - Provide the recordation information for the easements.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.



2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning classifications as noted by the standard above.




2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Provide the information noted by the standard above



2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 - - Provide the information noted by the standard above


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide the PAAL dimension on the west parking spots.
20. COMMENT: Show the required 1’-0” setback from the building to the drive through lane, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2).



2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - It is acknowledged that there is a parking detail on sheet C700 but please provide dimension and provide a detail for the regular parking spaces with dimensions.
22. COMMENT: Until comment 10 is addressed zoning cannot verify the parking requirements. On the parking calculation show required parking and proposed parking.
23. COMMENT: Until comment 10 is addressed zoning cannot verify the required number of electric vehicle parking requirements. Addition comment may be forthcoming.
24. COMMENT: Provide a stacking detail with dimension, Per UDC section 7.4.7.B.2 “The stacking area for drive-through lanes must not cross on-site pedestrian access.”



2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 10 is addressed zoning cannot verify the bicycle parking requirements. On the parking calculation show required parking and proposed parking




2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - Provide the information noted by the standard


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Provide the being setback as noted by the standard above. Show the required and the proposed setback. The setback along 1st av is the greater of 21ft or the height of the structure measured from the back of future curb location. The setback along Limberlost dr is the greater of 21ft or the height of the structure measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane .


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the use within the footprint of the building as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Clarify the circulation on site circulation to the south.


2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - Show pedestrian circulation to 1st, the proposed screen wall may be obstructing the circulation.


2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Pedestrian circulation to the collection areas will be required.


2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

32. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U - Provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

33. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Clarify if a mailbox is going to be proposed, If mail is to be delivered inside provide a note on the cover sheet “ Mail service to be located inside the building”


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

34. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Provide a note on the cover sheet that “ All proposed sign will be approver per a separate permit”


***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
01/09/2023 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
02/06/2023 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED
02/14/2023 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) REVIEW COMPLETED Re: Due: 2/8/2023- Development Package-1st submittal review-TD-DEV-0123-00097

Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov>
CDRC
Good Morning,

ADOT has no comments on this item, as it will not have an effect on ADOT facilities.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
02/21/2023 External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation REVIEW COMPLETED Case: TD-DEV-0123-00097

Tom Fisher
CDRC
Iliana Gonzales

Hello CDRC team,

On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I have no comments on the above rezoning case. It does not impact any City parks or facilities.


Tom Fisher
Project Manager
City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department
900 S. Randolph Way
Tucson, Arizona 85716
(520) 837-8037
02/06/2023 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED FYI, email sent to PAG.
02/06/2023 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED FYI email sent to southwest gas.
02/06/2023 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI, email sent to TEP
02/06/2023 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED FYI, email sent to USPS
02/07/2023 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
01/12/2023 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
01/12/2023 OK to Submit - Landscape Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
01/10/2023 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
04/04/2023 Real Estate REVIEW COMPLETED
02/07/2023 ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED TD-DEV-0123-00097
4137 N. 1st Ave.

Comments:
1. Any existing curb, sidewalk, or curb access ramps which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards.
2. New concrete driveway apron per P.A.G. standard 206 at entrance on Limberlost Dr.
3. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209.
4. New 5 ft. Concrete sidewalk along the entire property frontage of 1st Ave, per P.A.G. standard 200.
5. If any existing 4 Ft wide sidewalk along Limberlost is less than 4 Ft wide, it shall be removed and replaced with 5 Ft wide sidewalk.
6. New concrete curb returns on 1st Ave per P.A.G. standard 209.
7. New Concrete Curb Access Ramps per P.A.G. standard 207 at each curb return.
8. Any unused existing curb cuts will be closed. Close curb cuts with P.A.G. standard 209 Concrete Curb and P.A.G. standard 200 Concrete Sidewalk.
9. Plan Note No. 2- Concrete Header Curb. Concrete header not to be installed in the city ROW.
10. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited.
11. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk in the ROW, of both Limberlost Dr and 1st Ave.
12. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions.
13. Show existing and future right of way on DP plan.
14. Show existing and future sight visibility triangles on DP plan, at curb returned entrance on 1st Ave.
15. Protect in place existing streetlights.
16. Protect in place existing traffic control cabinet.
17. Protect in place existing catch basins.
18. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs.


David Stiffey
DTM Project Coordinator
David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov
02/07/2023 Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED TD-DEV-0123-00097
4137 N. 1st Ave.

Comments:
1. Any existing curb, sidewalk, or curb access ramps which are not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards.
2. New concrete driveway apron per P.A.G. standard 206 at entrance on Limberlost Dr.
3. Concrete curb per P.A.G. standard 209.
4. New 5 ft. Concrete sidewalk along the entire property frontage of 1st Ave, per P.A.G. standard 200.
5. If any existing 4 Ft wide sidewalk along Limberlost is less than 4 Ft wide, it shall be removed and replaced with 5 Ft wide sidewalk.
6. New concrete curb returns on 1st Ave per P.A.G. standard 209.
7. New Concrete Curb Access Ramps per P.A.G. standard 207 at each curb return.
8. Any unused existing curb cuts will be closed. Close curb cuts with P.A.G. standard 209 Concrete Curb and P.A.G. standard 200 Concrete Sidewalk.
9. Plan Note No. 2- Concrete Header Curb. Concrete header not to be installed in the city ROW.
10. 3’ minimum buffer between curb and sidewalk, unless ROW is limited.
11. At least one sidewalk is required to connect the onsite circulation path to sidewalk in the ROW, of both Limberlost Dr and 1st Ave.
12. Where adjoining sidewalk from the property ties to sidewalk along the ROW frontage, a 60” X 60” ADA landing is required. Landings shall be 60” X 60” and not to exceed a 2% cross slope in all directions.
13. Show existing and future right of way on DP plan.
14. Show existing and future sight visibility triangles on DP plan, at curb returned entrance on 1st Ave.
15. Protect in place existing streetlights.
16. Protect in place existing traffic control cabinet.
17. Protect in place existing catch basins.
18. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs.


David Stiffey
DTM Project Coordinator
David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov