Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-0123-00094
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 02/02/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/17/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See landscape comments | ||
| 01/27/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show how roof drainage up to the 10-yr storm will be directed under the adjacent sidewalk through the use of gutters/scuppers 2. Call out any ramps with the applicable ADA standard cross and running slopes 3. Call out any curb cuts 4. Provide a detail showing the WH areas will be depressed 6-9" not including any DG 5. On west drive-thru, the 12 ft width going from 46.6 -> 49.72 is a much steeper slope than 1%, please clarify 6. On north drive-thru, north spot grade 49.03 is lower than south spot grade 49.54, but the slope direction points the other direction. Please clarify or show grade break 7. Show spot grades on bottom of WH areas, as well as around any curb cuts to show water harvesting maximization 8. Clarify conflicting grade arrows in middle of new parking area |
||
| 01/17/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Starbucks ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-0123-00094 Address: 3100 E Speedway Blvd Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: Food Service Proposed Use: Drive through Food Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 17, 2023 DUE DATE: February 10, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Please draw existing plants to remain at correct scale to show heat mitigation on asphalt. 2. The landscape border along Speedway Blvd. does not meet landscape requirements, plants shall not be trimmed into balls but left in their natural growth pattern. 3. For clarity, remove plant symbols in the legend if not used on the plans. 4. Please spell check legends and notes for misspellings. 5. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Demonstrate how water harvesting is being maximized. 6. If using d.g. at 2” depth, make sure that the water harvesting basins are 8” deep to allow for d.g. depth. Make sure that grading, water harvesting and landscape plans match, as well as details. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 7. Engineer & LA comment - Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. First flush volumes should be directed to landscape areas. See pages 9-16 and Tables 2.2 and 2.3. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf COT edits - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf 8. Engineer & LA comment - The tables 2.2 and 2.3, pages 12-13 in the PCRFCD Manuel can be used in lieu of the Water Budget Table, the only thing that is missing is water demand for plants, which can be added. Make sure units match. Show how First Flush Volumes relate to plant water demands. 9. Engineer & LA comment The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. The plan doesn't show the effective use of run-off to supplement irrigation. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. All landscape areas should be included within infiltration areas. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. f. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 10. Engineer & LA comment - The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 11. Engineer & LA comment - Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 12. Show existing and proposed plant quantities and how together they meet the UDC requirements. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 13. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 14. Table 7.6.4-1- Requires 30” screen adjacent to parking areas along MS&R streets, 5’ screen along non-MS&R streets, adjacent to residential or office uses, a 5’ wall is required. 15. Consider using an organic groundcover such as mulch instead of d.g. 16. Installing landscape/irrigation in the right of way requires approval from DoT&M, contact david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov, plans cannot be approved without the department’s consent. 17. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 18. Show detail of backflow preventer with a locking cover. 19. Please label the separate irrigation meter “irrigation only”. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 20. Identify the type of irrigation controller with soil moisture gauge, tensiometer, weather station and/or evaportranspiration data. UDC Tech Standards 4-01.4.A. 21. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 22. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 7.6.8, Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.A.4. and Technical Standards 5-01.9., please be specific. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Tucson Development Center https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/02/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 3100 E SPEEDWAY BL Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-0123-00094 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 2, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 05, 2024 . SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B - Provide the information noted by the standard above. Provide a brief legal description on the title block of all sheets. The section township and range are incorrect. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-0123-00094, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A - Provide the information noted by the standard above. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - label 5th St 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Provide the use specific standards as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As speedway and country club rd are designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R map, provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)” 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - There appears to be three parcel on the map the proposed site shows the three combined please provide lot combo documentation. 8. COMMENT: Remove demo sheet or label for reference only, A demolition permit must be submitted. The demo permit is a separate submittal and is submitted at: https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above for the sewer private easement . 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Provide the information noted by the standard above for Country club. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Provide the information noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - The proposed ADA parking space will require a backup spur or clarify 14. COMMENT: Show the required 1’-0” setback from the building to the drive through lane, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2). 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Clarify how the long term bicycle spaces are to be illuminated per UDC 7.4.9.D.5. “ Long-term bicycle parking not within a building must be lit by overhead lighting. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Clarify why there is a difference in square footage on the general notes and the building footprint. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a dimension for the sidewalk adjacent to the ADA parking spaces. Sidewalk requires a minimum of four feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four feet 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.S - A Pedestrian circulation path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. Show the pedestrian path to Anderson Blvd a TSMR may be required. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - Clarify if a mailbox is going to be proposed, If mail is to be delivered inside provide a note “ Mail service to be located inside the building” 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Provide a note on the cover sheet that “ All proposed sign will be approved per a separate permit” ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 01/05/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/13/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/17/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/06/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/10/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/06/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/01/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments |