Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.4
Permit Number - TC-RES-1223-10203
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.4
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2024 | Residential Building | APPROVED | |||
| 08/02/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 08/02/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/17/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Ramiro Olivarez Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-1223-10203 433 S STRATFORD DR TUCSON, AZ 85716 – R-1 Zoning Detached Recording Studio w/Bath (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 07/17/2024 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - .9 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: Upload a complete plan set on the next submittal. For the next submittal on the elevation sheet provide the wall height from design grade to the top of the wall. Based on the information provided on the previous elevation attachments I calculated the wall height to be 13 feet from design grade to the highest part of the wall. 2. Comment: Zoning was not able to find any permit activity for the carport, per comment response number one. Zoning cannot approve the application of a proposed studio until a permit has been issued for the carport. (On the plan set state that the carport is being applied for under a different permit or submit documentation for the carport under this permit.) (Previous Comment: This comment was not fully addressed - Based on aerial photos the carport shown on the plan shows up sometime after 2014. Zoning was not able to find approved permit documents for this carport. Either provide approved documentation or include it in this permit. Provide the height, square footage and perimeter yard setbacks to this structure. Additional comments may be forthcoming. As no permit documentation was provided for the carport, no construction plans were provided, and the carport structure is over 200 square feet, a separate permit will be required for the carport) 3. Comment: The perimeter yard setback along the southern property line to the wall does not comply with the minimum setback (8’8”). Revise the setback to be measured from the southern property line to the proposed building wall. Per UDC 6.3-2.A, the minimum perimeter yard setback is the greater of 6’-0” or 2/3 (H) height of the exterior wall. The exterior wall height provided is 13 feet tall and 2/3 the wall height will require an 8’8” perimeter yard setback. As the perimeter yard setback is greater than 6’-0” or 2/3 (H) height of the exterior wall on the south property line at a minimum a neighbors setback waiver will be required, UDC Article 6.6.2.D. To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property (441 S STRATFORD DR) owner(s) (DIAMANTOULIS XRISTOS A): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ If you are unable to secure the waiver a Design Development Option (DDO) application must be submitted for review and approval. The following comments are related to the DDO if necessary. 3a. Comment: The perimeter yard setback along the southern property line to the wall does not comply with the minimum setback. Revise the setback to be measured from the southern property line to the proposed building wall. Per UDC 6.3-2.A, the minimum perimeter yard setback is the greater of 6’-0” or 2/3 (H) height of the exterior wall. The exterior wall height provided is 13 feet in height and 2/3 the wall height will require an 8’8” perimeter yard setback. Also, the overhang encroaches into the 8’8” perimeter yard setback. Per UDC 6.4.5.D.1, overhangs may extend two feet into the perimeter yard. 3b. Comment: Per the last review comment for the DDO no response was provided. The proposed structure and overhang encroach into the required perimeter yard and will require the approval of a Design Development Option (DDO) before zoning can approve this permit. The below paperwork can be filled out and submitted with the next submission. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf For more information about the DDO process contact Wyatt Berger at wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov 4. Comment: Another option if you are unable to secure a neighbor waver or do not wish to proceed with the DDO application process is to relocate the proposed project to meet the 8’8” required perimeter yard setback on the southern property line. 5. Comment: Dimension the setback from east property line to the existing storage shed wall and label its height. 6. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the proposed use for the addition and applicable use specific standards. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Provide a complete plan set in the next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nick Martell Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/09/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |