Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.3
Permit Number - TC-RES-1122-00772
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/20/2024 | Fire New Construction | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/15/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/21/2024 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Place an address for each dwelling on the Site Plan. The expanded dwelling is 1255 and the dwelling to be removed (separate permit) is 1245 W Cedar St. Update the square footage entries on the Site Plan consistent with entries on sheet S1.4. |
||
| 03/15/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: Nathan Herrera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-1122-00772 1245 W CEDAR ST Zoning R-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 15, 2024 These comment are still applicable. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1.COMMENT: The Site Plan calls out "Existing Residence to Be Demolished" A separate demolition permit will be required, zoning cannot approve this permit unit the demolition permit is approved. 2.COMMENT: Clarify access. There doesn't appear to be legal access to the property. An access easement will be required for this site. Provide the recorded access easement documentation with the next submittal, and show the access easement on the site plan. Zoning cannot approve of this permit until legal access is determined. 3.COMMENT: Per UDC Article 6.4.4.A, building height is the vertical distance measured from the design grade. On the elevation drawings provide the height dimension from design grade. Provide a scale for the drawings. 4. COMMENT: Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A, the required setback in the R-2 zone are the greater of 6 feet or 2/3 the height of the building wall. 5. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 6.4.5.B.5, Where an unbroken section of a wall or a building is not parallel with the lot line, the required perimeter yard may be applied to the average width; however, such perimeter yard shall not be narrower at any point than half the required width, nor narrower at any point than three feet. Provide distances from the western property line to the NW and SW corners of the building to determine if setbacks are being met. 6. COMMENT: It appears the required setbacks to the north and western property lines are not being met. Once building heights are provided from design grade the required setbacks to the north and west property lines can be determined. If setbacks will not be met a Design Development Option will have to be applied for and approved to reduce the required setbacks before this permit can be approved by Zoning. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be applied for and approved in order to reduce the setbacks as proposed before this permit can be approved by Zoning. The below paperwork can be filled out and submitted with the next submission. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/2019_ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf For more information about the DDO process contact Wyatt Berger at wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Nathan Herrera at (520)837-4894 or by email Nathan.Herrera@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/15/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |