Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Permit Number - TC-RES-1024-06151
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/15/2025 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-RES-1024-06151 2nd PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide a separate Comment Response Letter when submitting updated plans. Facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2018 International Residential Code and 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN SET showing all proposed alterations to the building with 2018 IRC code compliance. The plans require sufficient detail for demonstrating minimum building code compliance for passing all progress inspections. Note the 2018 IRC reference on the plans. Provide a response letter on separate file with the updated construction plan set. SITE PLAN: 1. The metal roof structure may not extend to a point closer than 2 feet from the adjoining (neighboring) property line without fire rated protection for fire spread. Provide compliance with R302.1 (City of Tucson Amended) by removing the roof placed within the 3-foot fire spread separation space along the property line or provide a complete wall barrier with not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction in compliance with IBC Table 721.1(2). A primary purpose of the building codes is for control of fire spread issues, especially across property lines. The concern is for both the flammability of the structure and for the control of a fire within the structure. Structural barriers are required when clear separation of structures is not provided. If you have any questions, please contact: PDSD-Residential@tucsonaz.gov City of Tucson Residential Plan Review Submit a corrected plan set at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services ---------------------- |
||
| 07/23/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-1024-06151– Residential– Metal shade structure and a back privacy fence (2nd Review) 3574 E NEBRASKA SV (R-1 Zoning) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 23, 2024 This site is in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 – 9. Plan review for the above referenced structures has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. For facilitating a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers zoning, use(s), legal description, adjacent properties, setbacks (building or wall heights), dimensional standards, property permitting history, density (units/lot size), and lot calculation (enclosed building and structure, parking, and driveway versus overall lot size) requirements. All code references are to the Tucson, AZ Unified Development Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Correct the following plot (site) plan and add the elevation sheets back in, as noted in the comments below, along with a detailed response letter indicating responses to the review comments. A. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #1; The following have yet to addressed from the previous reviewers’ comments: 1. Provide a residential plot plan that meets the requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Permits/Plan-Examples/Plot-Plan-Example ,to include but not limited to: c. Provide lot coverage calculation on the plot plan that meets the requirements of Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 6.4.3 and the example shown on the Residential Plot Plan Requirements. d. Indicate the maximum height of the shade structure. Per UDC Article 6.4.4.A building height is the distance measured from the design grade elevation to the highest point of a flat roof; (See Figure 6.4.4-A, Measurement of Building Height.) f. Based on the Mortimore Addition final plat found at: https://gis.pima.gov/maps/subdiv/select.cfm?null=&bkpg=10013 , there is a 7.5’ utility easement that runs long the south property line. Show this easement on the plot plan. g. Indicate the Zoning of the parcel and all adjacent parcels on the plot plan. i. Show all structures on the plot plan to include the shed located in the southwest corner of the parcel. Also, provide the applicable perimeter yard setbacks and the height of all structures. B. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #2; Provide height of existing rear porch and portion that was added in 2005 approximately. 2. Based on permit T04CM02684 and aerial photos the rear porch was expanded to east. Zoning was not able to find approved permit documents for this porch expansion. Either provide approved permit documents or include it in this building permit. C. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #3; The following was not addressed: 3. Per UDC Article 6.6.3.D Accessory structures, except for accessory dwelling units, shall not exceed 12 feet in height, unless attached to a principal structure. If attached to the principal structure, maximum height permitted shall be the same as for the principal structure. Based on provided information the shade structure appears to exceed the allowed 12’ height. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required to permit the shade structure as shown on the plan. See variance requirements below. An option would be to connect the shade structure to the existing residence with a 5’ wide roof structure that can support a 20-pound live load. D. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #4; There is no evidence a Board of Adjustment Variance was submitted and thus, not yet approved. It appears the neighbor waiver was prematurely retrieved prior to seeking and getting a Board of Adjustment Variance. Additionally, the waiver states it is a 1’-0” from the property line while the plans indicate it is 10”. Apply for Board of Adjustment variance and once approved obtain new (and corrected) neighbor waiver. 4. The minimum setback to interior property lines are the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a 14’ wall height the required perimeter yard setback from the post supporting the shade structure to the east property line is 9’-5”, proposed setback is 4”. That said depending on how comment 3 is addressed will determine how the reduced setback is addressed. If the shade structure remains detached and the variance is approved for the height, a neighbors setback waiver can be used to reduce the setback requirement, see waiver requirements below. If the shade structure is attached to the main dwelling to reduce the setback will require a Board of Adjustment for Variance. E. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #5; The chicken coup was not included in the latest drawing and thus, the associated dimensions from the property line. The neighbor waiver is required for this structure from the neighbor to the east. Two neighbor waivers are required for the children’s playhouse in the southwest corner portion of the property, one from the west neighbor and one from the southmost neighbor. See waiver requirements below. Provide heights of both structures on the plans. 5. There appears to be two (@) shed type structures, one (1) located in the southwest corner of the property and one (1) along the east property line. These structures do not appear to meet perimeter yard setbacks and at a minimum will require a neighbors setback waiver will be required. See waiver requirements below. F. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #6; The graphics (to indicate the fence location) still appear to be missing from the plans as it pertains to the east and west property lines. Provide missing information on site plan. 6. Clearly show all proposed fences on the plan. The metal wall elevations appear to indicate that you are proposing fence/wall along all the property lines, but the only metal wall shown on the plan is along the south property line. G. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #7; The proposed fence (11’-0” tall) along the east property line does not meet the perimeter yard setbacks and at a minimum will require a neighbors setback waiver will be required. See waiver requirements below. 7. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.I The maximum height of a wall or fence within a perimeter yard shall be six feet. The plans appear to show fence/walls greater than the allowed 6’-0”. Any wall located within 6’ of the property line that is taller than 6’-0” in height will require a Design Development Option for wall height. H. Per Previous 1st Review / Comment #9; Per initial review comment, provide all drawings (plan and elevation) as a single multipage PDF file for the next review. 8. The plans shall be submitted as a single multipage PDF file. I. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other the PDSD reviewer comments. Board of Adjustment application/requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration . Contact for the Board of Adjustment is Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov . DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration . If you have questions about the DDO application or process, please contact Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov . To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code . Please contact the zoning reviewer if you have any zoning questions: Jeffrey W Cassidy jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov City of Tucson Current Site Zoning and Planning Reviewer If you have any zoning questions, please contact me at jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov / (520) 837-4916. Additionally, our in-person counter at the Public Works building at 201 N Stone Ave |
||
| 07/14/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |