Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Permit Number - TC-RES-1023-09091
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2023 | Residential Building | APPROVED | |||
| 11/14/2023 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 11/16/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/14/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-1023-09091 9852 E. Gray Hawk Dr. - R-1 FLD Convert Garage to Sales Office & Model Complex (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 14, 2023 Provided a detailed comment response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all comments with your next submittal. This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single family residence FLD a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2), subject to use Specific Standard 8.7.3. 1. Per UDC Article 8.7.3.M and DP21-0284 General Note 23 an architectural variation plan (AVP) needs to be submitted and approved prior to approval of any building permits. The AVP shall be submitted as a revision to the DP. 2. Clearly demonstrate that a parking vehicle will not be allowed to encroach into the proposed pedestrian path along the east side of the building. As parking vehicle are allowed to overhand the proposed parking bumpers 2’-6”, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3, a minimum 4’-0” wide pedestrian path shall be maintained. 3. The provided a location dimension for the proposed parking bumpers is not correct, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 4. As the proposed accessible sign is located in or near a pedestrian circulation, the mounting height should be 84”. 5. The proposed access lane width of 19’-0” between the accessible parking are to the east property line does not meet the minimum 20’-0” width, UDC Figure 7.4.6-A & Table 7.4.6-1. 6. The proposed PAAL shown between the proposed parking spaces and the east property line does not meet the minimum 24’-0” width, UDC Figure 7.4.6-A & Table 7.4.6-1. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 11/01/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |