Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TC-RES-0923-07897
Parcel: 123140130

Address:
948 E WAVERLY ST

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.3

Permit Number - TC-RES-0923-07897
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/12/2023 Residential Building APPROVED
01/22/2024 Bldg Permits - Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
01/22/2024 Design Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT The Design Professional has approved your NPZ packet, and it is currently in the appeal period. The next building permit resubmittal will be reviewed against the approved NPZ design.
12/27/2023 Historic REQUIRES RESUBMIT For Historic demolition review and approval,
Attached is the correct link to the Demo Documentation form.

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/historic_demolition_application_form.pdf
The Assessor’s effective date is typically on the Assessor’s property card that you get from the County Assessor’s page.
If you have any questions, contact Michael Taku at Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov
12/13/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: TC-RES-0923-07897 – CE-VIO0723-04395
948 E. Waverly St. - NR-2
Renovation and 2nd Dwelling Unit (3rd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2023

This comment was not addressed. Provided a detail comment response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all comments with your next submittal.

This site is located in the NR-2 zone (UDC 5.10.3). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10.

COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for NPZ Review (UDC 5.10.3).

1. This comment was not addressed. As Park is not at future right-of-way the required perimeter is measured from the future right-of-way line there for the minimum front street perimeter yard setback to the existing street property line is 22’. This issue has been discussed with the Zoning Administrator and Elisa Hamblin agrees with this comment. If you have questions contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. Prior to Zoning approval an NPZ review must be submitted and approval. Owner has constructed an addition without permits. The property fronts on two (2) streets, Park Ave., a Collector designated on the COT MS&R Map and local Waverly. As the existing dwelling does not meet the required 20’ setback to Wavely, Park Ave is considered the front street for any new construction. The proposed front street perimeter yard setback along Park Ave. should be based on the future right-of-way (ROW) of 64’ or a 32” half ROW. The minimum Street perimeter yard setback from the existing property line shall be 22’-0” or a DDO will be required. NPZ review shall be submitted and approved prior to approval of this plan. NPZ requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Special-Districts.

COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for Architectural Documentation prior to demolition of historic buildings (UDC 3.12.1).

1. The Pima County Assessor’s effective construction date for your building or structure is 1945. The actual construction date may be earlier.
Buildings, portions of buildings or structures that are 50 years of age or older must be architecturally documented prior to demolition. Documentation will be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Office before a permit is issued.
Contact the Historic Review Section at PDSDHistoric@tucsonaz.gov for requirements.
This requirement is due to the demolition of the shed shown on the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.
12/04/2023 PDSD Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED