Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Permit Number - TC-RES-0724-04462
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 08/30/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/06/2024 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-RES-0724-04462 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide a separate Comment Response Letter when submitting updated plans. Facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2018 International Residential Code and 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN SET showing all proposed alterations to the building with 2018 IRC code compliance. The plans require sufficient detail for demonstrating an awareness of minimum building code compliance for passing all progress inspections. Provide a response letter on separate file with the updated construction plan set. SITE PLAN: 1. Provide a site plan showing the yard water pipe size to the dwelling, R106.1.1. Identify any utility line requiring upgrade or replacement. 2. Remove the proposed Sun Sail sited within the 3’ fire separation distance from a property line or show compliance with R302.1 (City of Tucson Amended) by providing a wall with one-hour rated materials prescribed in IBC Table 721.1(2), Items 15-1.1 to 16-1.3, R106.1. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. Provide a Roof Framing Plan showing the beams sized for supporting live and dead structural loads (Table R602.7(3)) or provide an engineer’s calculation, design, and seal for a performance design when minimum sizes are not code compliant with the IRC, R301.1. Show beam sizes for the carport and front porch. MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. Provide demand calculations in accordance with Manual J standards, M1401.3, M1601.1. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Show the circuit number for the smoke alarms, R314. If you have any questions, please contact: PDSD-Residential@tucsonaz.gov City of Tucson Residential Plan Review Submit a corrected plan set at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services |
||
| 08/30/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Ramiro Olivarez Planner; Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-0724-04462 2053 E MINORKA ST TUCSON, AZ 85706 - R-2 Zoning Multiple Additions (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: (08/30/2024) This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. The site plan should be designed to include the information as noted on the sample plot plan. See the link below for the information that is required on the plot plan. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/residential-permits/residential_plot_plan_requirements.pdf . 1. Comment: Label on the site plan the zone (R-2) and all the adjacent property zones (R-2). Or show a zoning detail of this properties zone and all adjacent property zones. See the sample plot plan above for an example. 2. Comment: Setbacks shall be shown from parcel lines to all corners of each proposed addition. a. Draw, label, and dimension setbacks for the Southeast corner of the proposed carport to the south and east property lines to ensure all corners of the proposed structure are meeting the front street setbacks. b. Draw, label, and dimension setbacks for the southwest corner of the extended porch to the south property line. c. Draw, label, and dimension setbacks for the Northwest corner of the proposed north addition to the North and West property lines. d. Draw, label, and dimension setbacks of the Southwest corner of the north addition to the West property line to ensure all corners of the proposed structure are meeting the setbacks. e. Draw, label, and dimension the setbacks from the new laundry room and from face of the ramada posts to the east property line. 3. Comment: Aerial views per Map Tucson (https://maps2.tucsonaz.gov/Html5Viewer/?viewer=maptucson) show a shed in the Northwest corner of the property and is not identified on the site plan. All structures shall be drawn, labeled, and dimensioned on the plot plan. See the link below for the information that is required on the plot plan. If this shed has been removed, please indicate that the shed is no longer there. Based on the northwest corner of the property, aerial views of the perimeter yard setback for this structure does to not comply with the R-2 perimeter yard of 6 feet or 2/3 (H) height. At a minimum a neighbors setback waiver will be required from the north adjacent property, UDC Article 6.6.2.D. To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property (2052 E CANADA ST) owner(s) (MANALOTO RONALDO S): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ 3a. Comment: The following may be applicable in the next review based on the setbacks provided for the shed. Side street perimeter yard setback on the West property line along Greenway Dr is 10 feet. Aerial views for the shed in the northwest corner show the shed is encroaching the 10-foot setback. The shed will need to be relocated or require the approval of a Design Development Option (DDO) before zoning can approve this permit. 4. Comment: Draw, label, and dimension the driveway on the site plan. 5. Comment: Clarify/Correct the driveway/vehicular use area calculations. The square footage provided does not match the numbers calculated from the floor plan. Include the carport and accessory structure in the northwest corner of the lot in the lot coverage calculations. 6. Comment: Draw, label, and dimension the sidewalk, back of curb to property line and the center line of E Minorka ST and S Greenway Dr (label the street name) to the property line as depicted on the sample plot plan. See the link above for the information that is required on the plot plan. 7. Comment: The drawn property lines and dimensions shown on the North property line do not match those found in Recorded Subdivision Plat Map Book 28, Page 48. Correct the property lines and dimensions including the southwest curve radius (25 feet) and the length (35.65 feet) (See the link for the Recorded Subdivision Plat Map Book https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/subdivisions/details/3307) 8. Comment: Show the entire east elevation structure. 9. Comment: Wall height of the carport is measured from design grade to the top of the beam. Dimension this height on the elevation sheets. The following comments are related to the DDO. 10. DDO Comment: The required side street perimeter yard setback along the West property line for the shed in the northwest corner of the property is a minimum of 10 feet. Aerial views show the shed does not comply with the R-2 side street perimeter yard of 10 feet. The shed encroaches into the 10 feet required side street perimeter yard setback and will require the approval of a Design Development Option (DDO) before zoning can approve this permit. The below paperwork can be filled out and submitted with the next submission. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf For more information about the DDO process contact Wyatt Berger at wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov 11. DDO Comment: The required perimeter yard setback along the East property line for the proposed attached pergola is a minimum of 6 feet. The owner proposes 12 inches and does not comply with the R-2 perimeter yard of 6 feet or 2/3 (H) height. The pergola encroaches into the 6 feet or 2/3 (H) height required perimeter yard setback and will require the approval of a Design Development Option (DDO) before zoning can approve this permit. The below paperwork can be filled out and submitted with the next submission. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf For more information about the DDO process contact Wyatt Berger at wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov 12. DDO Comment: The perimeter yard setback along the South property line for the proposed carport shown is 7’6”. The front street perimeter yard setback to the carport does not comply with the minimum 20-foot required front street perimeter yard setback. Per UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a, For single-family and duplex development, the minimum required front street perimeter yard is 20 feet measured from the street property line. Per UDC 6.4.5.C.1.c, for carports and garages in single-family and duplex development, the structural setback may be modified in accordance with Section 3.11.1, Design Development Option as follows: (1) For garages, a minimum of 18 feet (the length of a standard parking space) must be provided in front of the garage door so that a full 18-foot parking space is available for parking on site. (2) For carports, if the distance between the back of street curb and the carport is eight feet or less, a minimum of one-foot must be provided. The carport structure encroaches into the 20-foot required front street perimeter yard at 7’6” and will require the approval of a Design Development Option (DDO) before zoning can approve this permit. The below paperwork can be filled out and submitted with the next submission. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/planning-amp-zoning/ddo_for_setback_and_height_udc.pdf For more information about the DDO process contact Wyatt Berger at wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov 13. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the proposed use for the additions and applicable use specific standards. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro Olivarez Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/31/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |