Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.6
Permit Number - TC-RES-0624-03842
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.6
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/09/2025 | Site Zoning - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons Zoning Section Review PROJECT: TC-RES-0624-03842 9332 E Palm Tree Dr Tucson, AZ 85710 Shade Structures (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 4/9/2025 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - .9. Comments: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: The site plan should be designed to include the information as noted on the sample site plan. Please see https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/residential-permits/residential_plot_plan_requirements.pdf for reference. 2. Comment: Please label the surrounding zoning classifications as noted on the sample site plan. This property is surrounded by R-1 zoning. 3. Comment: Please include the legal description on your site plan which should read “ESTES PARK NO 2 LOT 102”. 4. Comment: Please include the lot coverage calculations as noted in the sample site plan including any accessory structures (ie: sheds) and the vehicular use area. 5. Comment: Please draw, label, and dimension the rear alley which is 16’ wide. 6. Comment: Please dimension the parcel lines. If needed, please refer to the subdivision plat map located here: https://gis.pima.gov/maps/subdiv/select.cfm?null=&bkpg=20077. 7. Comment: The ½ Right of Way is labeled incorrectly. Per paving plan I-70-042, the ½ Right of Way from centerline to property line along E. Palm Tree Drive is 25’. Please update your site plan to include the correct dimension. 8. Comment: Consent from the neighbor to the East property line can reduce the eastern setback for the side yard shade structure. To obtain a neighbors setback waiver, provide the following on the site plan and have the property owner sign and date: Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed_______ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ 9. Comment: Site zoning is unable to approve the building permit until the Design Development Option has been approved. Please see below. Comment: The following comments are related to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). Shade Structures 1 & 2 (Front Carports): In the R-1 zone, the minimum front street perimeter yard setback is 20’ and the side/rear yard setbacks are the greater of 6’ or 2/3 the height of the structures wall facing each interior property line (UDC Table 6.3-2.A). The proposed front street setback for the carports along E. Palm Tree Drive is 1’ 6”. The proposed setback will require approval through the DDO application process. Please contact Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov or Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have additional questions. Shade Structure 3 (Side Yard): Based on a proposed height of 6’ 6”, the minimum required setback to the East property line is 6’. The proposed building setback along the East property line for Shade Structure 3 is 1’ 8”. The proposed setback will require approval through the DDO application process. Please contact Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov or Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have additional questions. Shade Structure 4 (Rear Yard): Based on a proposed height of 6’ 10”, the minimum required setback to the East and South property line is 6’. The proposed building setback for the rear shade structure is 3’ 8” to the East property line and 3’ 4” to the South property line. The proposed setbacks will require approval through the DDO application process. Please contact Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov or Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov if you have additional questions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 04/10/2025 | Zoning Modifications - DDO - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: Georgia Pennington, Lead Planner DATE: 4/10/25 georgia.pennington@tucsonaz.gov A revised “Project Description and Applicant’s DDO Request” sheet is required. It should match exactly what the comments state about setback reductions, see below: In the R-1 zone, the minimum front street perimeter yard setback is 20’ and the side/rear yard setbacks are the greater of 6’ or 2/3 the height of the structures wall facing each interior property line (UDC Table 6.3-2.A). Shade Structures 1 & 2 (Front Carports): The required front street setback is 20’ and the proposed setback for the carports along E. Palm Tree Drive is 1’ 6”. Shade Structure 3 (Side Yard): Based on a proposed height of 6’ 6”, the minimum required setback to the East property line is 6’. The proposed building setback along the East property line for Shade Structure 3 is 1’ 8”. Shade Structure 4 (Rear Yard): Based on a proposed height of 6’ 10”, the minimum required setback to the East and South property line is 6’. The proposed building setback for the rear shade structure is 3’ 8” to the East property line and 3’ 4” to the South property line. Additionally, please include a description for why the reductions are necessary. Finally, please include the code violation in your description. Feel free to email me the updated request sheet and then I will invoice you. |
||
| 03/06/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | This is a DDO Only Review. Site Zoning and Residential Building reviews are still pending approval. |