Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Permit Number - TC-RES-0624-03625
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2024 | Fire New Construction | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/24/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 07/24/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/19/2024 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The Special District minor review application submittal is complete. Please submit all the same materials under the Historic sub-record. Once you log into TDC Online, go to the My Work tab, and then go to Plans (not Permits). Under Plans there should be the Historic sub-record which I have opened under the TC permit number, and this is where the same materials are submitted. Given that the application is for a studio, it will be a full review. On page 2 of this document under Full review in the table are all the items that you will need for the historic full review. Once submitted the system will generate an SD #. Staff will then contact you about the next steps including invoicing and payment of review fee. Once fee are paid, a minor review will be scheduled. See link below for steps on resubmitting. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf I am also attaching a flow chart that should help you understand the process. If you have any questions, contact Michael Taku at Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/27/2024 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide a complete construction plan set showing 2018 IRC compliance after DDO approval. 2. Any structure placed in the 3-foot fire separation distance from the adjoining (neighboring) property line requires not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction for reducing fire spread across the property line, R302.1. Fire rated materials are found in IBC Table 721.1(2), Items 15-1.1 to 16-1.3. 3. Provide an engineer’s calculation, design and seal for retaining walls with unbalanced fill exceeding 48 inches measured from the bottom of foundation, R404.4. |
||
| 07/19/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-0624-03625 425 N Court Ave Tucson, AZ 85701 Detached Home Office (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 7/19/2024 DUE DATE: 7/21/2024 This site is located in the HR-3 zone (UDC 4.7.12). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - 9. Comment: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: This property was developed under the Land Use Code (LUC) designator Residential Cluster Project 7, (RCP-7) subject to criteria 3.6.1 and 3.5.7.1.F. Section 3.6.1.4.D.c.1-5 states Perimeter Yards are as follows: Along interior lot lines for attached dwellings, setbacks are not required provided traffic sight visibility, as required in Development Standards 3-01.0, is not obstructed and at least 300 square feet of outdoor space is located on that lot, and: 1. Of the three hundred square feet, a minimum of 100 square feet is provided as one consolidated outdoor space; and 2. The one hundred square foot space is a minimum of ten feet in width in any direction; and 3. Such consolidated space is designed as an extension of the indoor space with access from that space; and 4. The consolidated space is not obstructed by any overhang less than seven feet above design grade; and 5. The consolidated space is not within the sight visibility area as provided in the Development Standard 3-01.0. Please demonstrate on your site plan that the open space requirement will be met. 2. Comment: The street perimeter yard width shall be in accordance with Section 3.2.6.5 unless special zoning requirements dictate a greater distance or a different point of measurement. RCP-7 has a perimeter yard setback of CC based on adjacent property zoned Office which states: -street frontage setback of 1 foot. -neighboring property setback based on Height of building wall or 11’ based on your provided plans. 3. Comment: The proposed addition eliminates the required onsite parking spaces at this residence. A Board of Adjustment Variance will be required to modify the required onsite parking spaces for this residence. 4. Comment: A Board of Adjustment Variance will need to be requested to: a. Reduce your South (rear) yard setback to 0’ as proposed in your plans. b. Reduce your Meyer Ave setback to 0’ as proposed in your plans. c. Eliminate the required onsite parking. Please contact Mark Castro (mark.castro@tucsonaz.gov), Wyatt Berger (wyatt.berger@tucsonaz.gov), or Georgia Pennington (georgia.pennington@tucsonaz.gov) for additional information about the Variance process. 5. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming based on responses to zoning comments and changes made to the plans. This site is located in the HR-3 zone. Historic Review will be required as well. Below is the link for the historic application. Please contact Jodie Brown (Jodie.brown@tucsonaz.gov) or Michael Taku (michael.taku@tucsonaz.gov) if needed. Zoning cannot approve this permit until the historic review has been approved. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/20/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/22/2024 | Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED |