Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: TC-RES-0526-02710
Parcel: 117030740

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL ADD/ALT v.1

Permit Number - TC-RES-0526-02710
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL ADD/ALT v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/02/2026 Bldg Permits - Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
05/25/2026 Historic REQUIRES RESUBMIT This property is located within the West University Historic Preservation Zone. A Full Historic Review is required. SPECIAL DISTRICT SUB-RECORD: Staff has created a Special District (SD) Sub-Record in TDC Online for your Historic Review. Your historic sub-record is SD-0526-00081
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: Historic Review requires a supplemental application called a Design Package. Please see the Historic & Special Districts Application Instructions for more information about submittal requirements: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/special_districts_application_instructions_3.3.2025.pdf. As part of your Design Package, please include all documents in the full review column including but not limited to the following: project description, site plan, roof plan for the pergolas, elevations, photographs of existing conditions, show location of the project, historic inventory form, Development Zone map as described in instructions along with precedent photographs. All materials required as part of your Design Package should be combined and uploaded to your Special District Sub-Record [SD-0526-00081] as a single PDF.
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING RECOMMENDED FOR FULL REVIEWS: It is highly recommended that all Full Historic Reviews go through a pre-application meeting with Historic Preservation staff prior to submittal. To request a pre-application meeting, email your assigned Historic Preservation planner.
REVIEW PROCESS: Applications for projects that qualify for Full Historic Review will be reviewed by staff. Once the Design Package is deemed complete and fees are paid, staff will schedule a Full Review with representatives of the West University Historic Zone Advisory Board and the Tucson-Pima County Historical Commission, Plans Review Subcommittee. **Please notify your assigned Historic Preservation Planner via email once you pay your fees.** Following board and commission review, comments will be forwarded to the PDSD Director, who makes the final decision. Conditions of approval are common and revisions to the Design Package will be required before final approval. Staff will generate a Notice of Decision and stamp the final approved Design Package. You can resume the regular planning/building review process.
QUESTIONS: For questions or to set up a meeting with Historic staff, please contact: Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov.
06/02/2026 Residential Building - Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Requires resubmit. Please note the following:


Provide a simple site plan with the following information:
1. Show the location and size of buildings, utility meters and gas line from property line to grill and fire pit R106.1.1. Identify the utility lines requiring upgrade or replacement.
Example: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/2/pdsd/documents/plan-samples/basic-site-plan_feb2026.pdf

2. Show size (diameter), length, and material of pipe for gas lines.
Example of a gas pipe template: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/residential-permits/gas_piping_sample_060324.pdf

NOTE: Gas line information can be added onto site plan. A separate gas template is NOT required.
05/26/2026 Residential Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit Activity Number: TC-RES-0526-02710
Project: Residential Addition/Alteration
Location: 243 E UNIVERSITY BL
Review Date: 5/26/2026
Reviewer: Joe Macaulay – Civil Engineer - Site Engineering

Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. For facilitating a shorter review time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued. Provide a response letter addressing each comment with location of change on the plans. Submit the separate response letter and plan set files.

Site Engineering Review Comments:
1. Per the City of Tucson Inclusive Home Design Ordinance https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/inclusivehomedesignordinance.pdf, all new dwellings have a requirement to provide an “accessible route from public and common areas, including, but not limited to, a driveway or public street or sidewalk”.
a. Draw, dimension, and label an accessible route from each Vehicular Use Area to an accessible entrance for each unit. Ensure the route meets accessibility standards as articulated in 2017 ICC A117.1 Sections 402-403, including the minimum 4ft-width, slope and composition materials.
2. Please address any comments from the Zoning Review.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Joe Macaulay at Joe.Macaulay@tucsonaz.gov
05/27/2026 Residential Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner
Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: TC-RES-0526-02710 – Residential Building – Two Pergolas
243 E UNIVERSITY BL TUCSON, AZ 85705 (HR-3 Zoning)
Site Plan Review – 1st Review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 27, 2026

This site is in the R-3 Residence Zone (UDC 4.7.12). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6.

Plan review for the above referenced two pergolas has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. For facilitating a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued.

1. COMMENT: Zoning has completed this review with four comments but cannot ultimately approve until the until the Historic reviewer comments are met and completed (Refer to Historic Reviewer Comments for further direction).

2. COMMENT: No site plan was provided.

Provide a site plan that meets the requirements show in the plot plan example at the following link:

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/2/pdsd/documents/plan-samples/basic-site-plan_feb2026.pdf

https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/plan-samples/basic-site-plan-spanish.pdf

Specifically:

A. Draw, label and dimension everything that exists on the property to a scalable drawing graphic (examples include the principal residence, porches, breezeways, sidewalks, driveways, parking spots, walls, fences, ramada, shed, carport, shade sail, cistern, pool, guest house, sleeping quarters, accessory dwelling unit) and provide dimensions of any structure as it relates to nearby structures and property lines and provide the heights (measured from above finish grade to top of wall, etc.) of those structures that run parallel-perpendicular to any nearby adjacent property lines.

B. Refer to Pima County’s website https://gis.pima.gov/maps/detail.cfm?&parcel=117030740 to locate and provide the parcel number, legal description, subdivision name, book and page numbers, township-section and range, sequence number on the plot plan.

C. Draw, label and dimension all property lines, (provide property line lengths) and any easements (if applicable) to be reflective in the property title report. Refer to Pima County’s website https://www.asr.pima.gov/ParcelData/Map/Arm/COT_ALL/COT_D005.pdf . The math of the property line lengths will produce the total parcel square footage. Be aware that some easements may require referring to the title report of the property (procure at title company if not already in possession. For example, this is especially significant in avoiding building in a utility easement where the provider may need regular access to service. Any need to build within the easement would then require written approval from the utility provider within that easement.

D. As a result of not producing a site plan with property line lengths, a lot coverage calculation table was not provided. Per UDC Article 6.4.3.C.1.a roofed areas, porches, open on at least one side are NOT included in the calculation and per UDC Article 6.4.3.B.3.b Vehicular use areas, measured within the outside edges of any area allocated to vehicle use, whether improved or unimproved, are included in the lot coverage.

Calculate (measure) square footage of every enclosed (NOT open structures like a porch, ramada, carport) structure on site and all vehicular use area (driveway, parking, turnaround, backup) and input into lot coverage calculation table. A carport would be calculated under vehicular use area. These separate ‘category numbers are added together and divided by the total parcel square footage to produce the lot coverage percentage that demonstrates compliance (or not).

E. Draw, label and dimension the principal residence graphic to be representative of that via Pima County’s website (property record card) https://www.asr.pima.gov/ParcelData/prc/11703/0740.pdf . Include any unpermitted additions, modifications and label.

F. Draw and label front E University Bl.

G. Provide HR-3 zoning labels on all four sides of this parcel (including this parcel).

H. Provide missing site plan scale, corresponding graphic scale and north arrow.

3. COMMENT: Zoning has acknowledged this property has a structure on-site with a with ‘contributing status’ with the National Register of Historic Places and advises the owner to contact the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) to determine if this project will impact the status. Contact https://azstateparks.com/SHPO for more information. This comment is purely made as a courtesy as there may be tax implications. No action is required and is at the discretion of the owner.

4. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:

1. Corrected building permit

2. Provide a detailed response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all Zoning comments.

3. Resubmit ALL documents associated with this permit

To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home

Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/old-pdfs/double-old/resubmittals.pdf

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov

The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code
05/22/2026 PDSD Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED