Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Permit Number - TC-RES-0425-02038
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/27/2025 | Residential Building - Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 06/16/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/16/2025 | Site Zoning - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Krista Hansen Planning & Development Services Department – Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-0425-02038 829 N CATALINA AV Convert Carport to Bedroom with Bathroom and Foyer Addition (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 06/16/2025 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 -.9. 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: Provide a residential plot plan that meets the requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Building-Safety/Plan-Examples/Plot-Plan-Example. to include but not limited to: a. The plot plan shall show what is proposed. b. The plot plan shall be drawn at an engineering scale, i.e. 1” = 10, 1” = 20’. c. Provide a dimension from the centerline of Catalina Ave. to the face of curb and from face of curb to the east property line. d. Provide applicable perimeter yard setback dimensions from all proposed work to the applicable property lines. e. The lot coverage calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.3.B.3.b Vehicular use areas, measured within the outside edges of any area allocated to vehicle use, whether improved or unimproved are included in the lot coverage. f. The provided site plan shows sidewalk along Catalina Ave. but based on aerial photos there are no sidewalks along Catalina Ave. g. The FRONT SETBACK + 20’-0” OR 2/3 H”, listed on the site plan is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a and provide the correct street perimeter yard setback. **Response to Previous Comment 1: This comment still stands. The following was not addressed: a. The plot plan shall be drawn at an engineering scale, i.e. 1” = 10, 1” = 20’. b. Per paving plan I-628, it is 18’-0” from the centerline of Catalina Ave to the face of curb. The site plan shows 16’-0”. Correct site plan. c. The FRONT SETBACK + 20’-0” OR 2/3 H”, listed on the site plan is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a, the front street setback is 20’-0”. d. On the site plan, the lot coverage calculation says 67% in one place and 33.25% in another. 67% is incorrect. Remove from site plan. e. Per Pima County subdivision plat map (MP 05010) the north and south property lines are 92’-0”. On the site plan they appear to be 84’-0”. Correctly dimension and label on next submittal. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Correct plans, as noted in the comments above, along with a detailed response letter indicating how all Site Zoning comments were addressed. For questions regarding Zoning comments, please contact me at: Krista.Hansen@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/20/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |