Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Permit Number - TC-RES-0324-01848
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/23/2024 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 09/23/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/26/2024 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-RES-0324-01848 was processed as (phase 1) a foundation only permit. Phase two should be submitted with a new application and permit number with reference to the phase one permit. | ||
| 09/03/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Show existing fence in ROW, fence relocation is necessary to provide a clear and safe passage within the rights-of-way for pedestrians. | ||
| 09/03/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons Zoning Section Review PROJECT: TC-RES-0324-01848 1242 W MOHAVE RD. TUCSON, AZ 85705 Bedroom Addition (2nd Revision Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/3/2024 Comments: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - .9. 1. Comment: Thank you for resubmitting your site plan. The dimensions should all be shown from the property lines to the exterior walls of all structures (clarify if the dimensions shown to the existing structures are to the roof overhang or to the structure walls?). When we measure your dimensions using the provided scale of 1/8” to 1’, the numbers do not correspond to what is shown on your plans. We used the measurement scale in Bluebeam to confirm the provided dimensions. 2. Comment: Please show the perimeter patio wall that runs along the East, West, and South property lines. Per Google street view, the perimeter patio walls appear to be on the property lines and not as depicted on the site plan. Please confirm and verify exact or correct locations. 3. Comment: Per COT paving plan I-703 page 7, the back of curb to property line dimension is 12’ as depicted on the paving plan street cross section. Also, the center line to back of curb dimension is 18’ per the same cross section on paving plan. Please update this on your plans. 4. Comment: The alley is labeled incorrectly. Per recorded plat Map 10 page 59, a 20’ alley was recorded for this subdivision. Per the recorded Map 12 page 22, an 18’ alley was dedicated with no utility or drainage easements to the northern subdivision. The full width of the alley is 38’. Please revise the alley note to remove utility/drainage easement and update the width. 5. Comment: Please address the following items that were found to be incorrect, missing, or drawn/dimensioned incorrectly. A. The distance between the main residence and the adjacent shed structure appears to be greater than what is depicted on the plans. Please update as required. B. As noted in comment 2 above, the perimeter patio walls appear to be drawn in the incorrect locations. The East, West, and North walls appear to be on the property lines and not as depicted on the plans. The South patio wall has not been drawn on the plans. Please draw and label the South patio wall (parts of the South patio wall are within the right of way approximately 1 to 2 feet from the back of curb). Please check with PDSD Engineering or Department of Transportation for possible future right of way improvements that may be impacted by the wall in the right of way. C. Now that the right of way information has been provided on the plans, we have verified that the additional parking space on the West encroaches into the right of way/pedestrian area. The minimum length of a parking space on site must be 18’ (the previous submittal showed a full 20’ parking space on site. Please update the parking space or remove the additional parking space from the site plan). D. Due to the inconsistencies in the placement of walls/dimensions, it is requested that the dimensions for the existing structures be labeled on the plans so that we can string all of the dimensions and verify the length and width of the lot. (all dimensions must be measured from the exterior structure walls). E. The maximum proposed height of the new addition along the East perimeter has not been labeled on your plans. Please label the maximum height of the wall attached to the existing structure. 5. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal based on responses to these zoning comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal or would like to meet with me to discuss these comments, please contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-4977 to setup an appointment. |
||
| 08/20/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |