Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL ADD/ALT v.1
Permit Number - TC-RES-0226-00679
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL ADD/ALT v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Residential Building - Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/19/2026 | Design Review - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Work requiring a building permit visible from the right-of-way, requiring NPZ Design Review. A Special Districts Pre-Application Meeting is needed, in which staff and the Design Professional can evaluate a draft design package and provide feedback before you submit your Design Review Sub-Record request. More information on Special Districts, Submittal Checklist, Neighborhood Preservation Zone Compatibility Criteria, and the Neighborhood Design Manual can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Special-Districts |
||
| 03/02/2026 | Residential Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TC-RES-0226-00679 Location: 1347 N EUCLID AV Review Date: 3/2/2026 A Comment Response letter is required. Please address all reviewer’s comments in a separate document with all required documents for resubmittal. Residential Engineering Comments: 1. This project/site resides within the City of Tucson recognized Mabel Street FP and will require the submission and approval of a floodplain use (FPU) permit. The FPU permit is a separate permit that shall be applied for within the "sub-records" tab of this associated building permit through TDC online. 2. The FPU permit will require the submission of TWO DOCUMENTS. 1. A cost estimate form AND 2. A separate appraisal that includes the value of the structure for the proposed remodel. a. A cost estimate of both materials and labor will be required from the contractor responsible for the project. It will break down the total cost into separate lines, separating labor, materials/equipment, and warranties/fees associated with the project. Ensure to have company/contractor letterhead on the document for proper documentation. This cost estimate will be used for substantial improvement calculations. b. Separate appraisal must include both structures to determine the value of the addition. 3. Final Site Engineering approval for permit (TC-RES-0226-00679) requires review and approval of associated submitted FPU permit. 4. ***NOTE: Should the estimated cost exceed 50% the value of the structure proposed for renovation, then substantial improvement would be triggered, and the structure would need to be raised to flood plain standard. The BFE for the proposed renovation is 2411.14-FT NAVD 88, meaning the FFE would need to be 2412.14 NAVD 88 should substantial improvement be triggered. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Dylan Molina. Dylan.Molina@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/23/2026 | Residential Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-0226-00679 – Residential Building – Existing structure interior remodel 1347 N EUCLID AV TUCSON, AZ 85719 - Rev 1 (NR-1 Zoning) Site Plan Review – 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 23, 2026 This site is in the NR-1 Residence Zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - .9 for 1 unit; 4.9.7.B.1 - .9, & .11 for 2 units (min. 10,000 sq ft lot size required). The City's Unified Development Code (UDC) (Section 1.4.1.C) establishes that before the City issues any approvals or permits; we must confirm that a site complies with UDC standards. Therefore, as part of permit reviews, we review a site's permit history and compare it to aerial photography to confirm that unpermitted work has not occurred. In many cases, this does mean that a homeowner must apply for permits for unpermitted work before we can approve any new work on that site. Plan review for the above referenced single-family residence has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. For facilitating a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued. 1. COMMENT: Refer to the Design reviewer comments. Zoning cannot approve this permit until the related Special Districts application is first approved and the PDSD Director's Decision Letter is resubmitted as part of this permit. Please upload the Director's Decision Letter here once received. Zoning cannot approve this permit until this task has been completed. 2. COMMENT: The site plan provided is incomplete. Provide a site plan that meets the requirements show in the plot plan example at the following link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/2/pdsd/documents/plan-samples/full-site-plan_feb2026.pdf Specifically: A. Draw, label and dimension all setbacks. Setbacks for side and rear property lines are 5’-0” flanking the south and west property lines. The front yard setback is 20’-0” (east property line). The street side yard setback is 10’-0” (north property line). Update plan and associated content accordingly.. B. Update property lines lengths and any easements to be reflective of information on Pima County’s website. Refer to Pima County’s website https://www.asr.pima.gov/ParcelData/Map/Arm/MP02/02035_03.pdf The math of the property line lengths will produce the total parcel square footage. Be aware that some easements may require referring to the title report of the property (procure at title company if not already in possession). C. A lot coverage calculation table was not provided. Per UDC Article 6.4.3.C.1.a roofed areas, porches, open on at least one side are NOT included in the calculation and per UDC Article 6.4.3.B.3.b Vehicular use areas, measured within the outside edges of any area allocated to vehicle use, whether improved or unimproved are included in the lot coverage. Calculate (measure) square footage of every enclosed (NOT open structures like a porch, ramada, carport) structure on site and all vehicular use area (driveway, parking, turnaround, backup) and input into lot coverage calculation table. A carport would be calculated under vehicular use area. These separate ‘category numbers’ are added together and divided by the total parcel square footage to produce the lot coverage percentage that demonstrates compliance (or not). D. Provide NR-1 zoning labels on all four sides of this parcel (including this parcel). E. Provide missing arrow. F. Provide the missing drafter-designer-consultant name, address, license number and contact information on the title block of every sheet. G. There is a discrepancy in the square footage of the site plan (480 proposed plus 480 existing square feet as currently labeled) and the A1.0 Floor Plan measuring at approximately 362 square foot for the proposed portion and 429 for the existing portion. Clarify square footage and adjust graphics on sheets to the accurate existing and proposed square footages. 3. COMMENT: Per UDC 6.6.3.B.5., An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is limited to 75% of the gross floor area of the principal dwelling, not to exceed 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Currently, the principal residence is listed as 725 square feet and 75% of 725 is 544 square feet. The Guest House (ADU) square footage exceeds this standard as it is listed as 960 square feet. Two options exist: a) Modify design to meet UDC 6.6.3.B.5. b) Submit a new permit as a single-family residence dwelling unit. c) Reclassify project as ‘Middle Housing’ and comment in the comment response letter that you would like this project to categorized (and reviewed as such). MIDDLE HOUSING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: (Pertains to proposed scope only). A. One canopy tree is required for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the development project. B. Vegetative groundcover is required within the front yard setback per the calculation below. Parcels with less than 30 lineal feet of street frontage may place the required ground cover in alternate locations indicated on the site plan. (X Linear feet of Street Frontage) – (Y curb cut width) x (5 Foot Depth) = Z Square Feet of required vegetative groundcover. C. Plants must be low to very low water use with a hardiness rating of 15 degrees Fahrenheit or lower and non-invasive. Options are listed in Section 5-02.5.0 of the Technical Standards Manual. Exceptions to these criteria or plants that are not listed in Section 5-02.5.0 of the Technical Standards Manual, may be approved by the PDSD Landscape Architect. D. Required landscaping must be located as follows: 1. A minimum of fifty percent of the required canopy trees must be located within the front yard setback area. a. Exception: If site constraints prevent new tree placement in a front yard, five shrubs may be substituted per required tree. Required trees must still be placed elsewhere on the site. Shrubs used as a substitute plant material for the required tree shall range from three feet in height by three feet in width, or larger. Shrubs must follow the relevant spacings from utility lines in section 5-01.5.11of the Technical Standards Manual but can be planted one radius of their mature width from foundations, enclosed sidewalks, sidewalks, and curbs. b. Exception: The tree required for an accessory dwelling unit may be placed anywhere on site. 2. Trees may be planted at varying distances apart. 3. Required landscaping is not restricted to the first 10 feet onto the property from the existing or future right-of-way line. 4. Newly planted trees must be placed at a minimum distance from existing or proposed City of Tucson-owned or private utility-owned lines, as found in section 5-01.5.11 of the Technical Standards Manual. Tree plantings are not permitted in El Paso Gas Easements or under overhead power lines. 5. Trees shall be placed a minimum of ten feet from the center of the tree trunk to any enclosed structure. 6. Trees shall be placed a minimum of five feet from the back of the sidewalk or curb. If this standard cannot be met, then root barriers are required and must be illustrated on the submitted construction plans. 7. Trees must be planted in a six-to-nine-inch depressed planting area of at least 50 square feet (four-foot radius, or alternatives as proposed) and at least ten feet away from a building foundation. 8. Existing, established trees on property, at least 4 inches trunk diameter at chest height, located at least ten feet from the foundation or with an unobstructed dripline at maturity, shall count toward this requirement. The root systems of existing trees used for this requirement must be protected from soil compaction during construction using perimeter protective fencing around the dripline. Established trees are not required to have a depressed planting area. Existing shrubs and vegetative groundcover may also be used toward the required landscaping. D. Vegetation shall be established, maintained, and sustained throughout its life in support of the City’s tree count, climate, and walkability goals. One of the following two options may be used: 1. Drip or bubbler irrigation with backflow protection. A simple irrigation system can be part of the domestic water supply for the residence. 2. Alternate methods, such as rainwater harvesting, hand watering, and greywater systems, as proposed by the property owner and approved by the PDSD Landscape Architect. E. Proposed landscaping and related items can be included in a residential plot plan; a Landscape Plan is not required. 4. COMMENT: Zoning has acknowledged this property has a structure on-site with a with ‘contributing status’ with the National Register of Historic Places and advises the owner to contact the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) to determine if this project will impact the status. Contact https://azstateparks.com/SHPO for more information. This comment is purely made as a courtesy as there may be tax implications. No action is required and is at the discretion of the owner. 5. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: 1. Corrected building permit 2. Provide a detailed response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all Zoning comments. 3. Resubmit ALL documents associated with this permit To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/old-pdfs/double-old/resubmittals.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code |
||
| 02/13/2026 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |