Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Permit Number - TC-RES-0125-00382
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/26/2025 | Residential Building - Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 03/10/2025 | Site Engineering - Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 03/10/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/05/2025 | Site Zoning - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Ramiro Olivarez Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-RES-0125-00382 701 W ELVIRA RD – R-1 Zoning Detached Ramada (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 03/05/2025 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - .9 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: Clarify the height if proposed detached ramada. The height to the T.O. Ridge is measured at 8’-0” while the height to the T.O. Masonry is measured at 8’-0”. Ensure the elevation heights for the T.O. Ridge/Masonry are correct and are consistent with the listed building heights notes section. 2. Comment: The east side yard setback listed under the setback notes is not correct. The east side yard setback is 10’ not 6’. List a side yard street setback of 10’. (Side yard setback when abutting two streets is 10’, Per UDC 6.4.5.C.1.d. – https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-4833) 3. Comment: The 168 SF Storage does not appear to have been permitted. Draw, label, and dimension the south and west property setbacks to 168 SF Storage. List the height of the 168 SF Storage within the footprint of this structure on the site plan. This is to ensure that this structure meets setback compliance requirements. Or provide permit documentation for this structure. 4. Comment: Draw, label, and dimension the rear 16’ alley. (See the Recorded Subdivision Plat Map Selection for Book 15, Page 3 - https://gis.pima.gov/maps/subdiv/select.cfm?null=&bkpg=15003) 5. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the proposed use for the addition and applicable use specific standards. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Provide corrected plan set in the next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro Olivarez at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/05/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |