Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.3
Permit Number - TC-RES-0125-00066
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/02/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/26/2025 | Residential Building - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-RES-0125-00066 R1 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide a separate Comment Response Letter when submitting updated plans. Facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2018 International Residential Code and 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. PROVIDE A COMPLETE PLAN SET showing all proposed alterations to the building with 2018 IRC code compliance. Provide a response letter addressing each comment with location of change on the plans. Submit separate letter and plan set files. PLANS: 1. Provide a Garage Roof Framing Plan with dimensions showing the beams sized for supporting live and dead structural loads. A rigid board is not appropriate for the garage roof slope and lack of ceiling joist. 2. Show the ridge structural member as a full-sized beam with appropriate load bearing rating when the roof pitch is less than 3” to 12”, R802.3. Or show all roof structural members with rafter ties (or ceiling joists) and collar ties (ridge straps) when the roof pitch is equal or greater than 3” to 12”, R802.3. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Show full cutoff fixtures when located within 25 feet from the property line OLC 401.3.3. Show unshielded fixtures with a maximum of 3,000 lumens, OLC 401.4. Clarify the fixtures on sheet A-5. If you have any questions, please contact: PDSD-Residential@tucsonaz.gov City of Tucson Residential Plan Review Submit a corrected plan set at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services |
||
| 04/02/2025 | Site Zoning - Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons Zoning Section Review PROJECT: TC-RES-0125-00066 7626 E Lerma Place Tucson, AZ 85710 Repair Fire Damage and replace Garage (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 4/2/2025 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - .9. Comments: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: The site plan should be designed to include the information as noted on the sample site plan. Please see https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/residential-permits/residential_plot_plan_requirements.pdf for reference. 2. Comment: Previous comment 3 not addressed correctly. Please draw, label, and dimension the ½ Right of Way from centerline to the base of wedge curb and from base of wedge curb to the property line. Please refer to paving plan I-64-007 page 10 for the correct dimensions. https://maps-and-records.tucsonaz.gov/construction-plans/details/I-64-007. 3. Comment: Previous comment 4 not addressed correctly. Please dimension the rear alley on your site plan. The alley is 16’. 4. Comment: Previous comment 5 not addressed correctly. The East property dimension on the site plan is incorrect. Please refer to Maps and Records MP-17-008 for the correct property dimensions. https://gis.pima.gov/maps/subdiv/select.cfm?null=&bkpg=17008. 5. Comment: Previous comment 7 not addressed correctly. Per UDC 6.4.3.C.1, “Roofed areas, open on at least one side, which provide shelter to exterior areas such as balconies, entrances, stoops, and terraces, provided they are not used for utilities, maintenance, laundry, storage, or motor vehicle parking are excluded from lot coverage calculations.” Please remove the entry walkway and pool/deck from your lot coverage calculations. Also, please include any accessory structures (IE: sheds) in your lot coverage calculations and update the totals. 6. Comment: Setbacks in the R-1 zone are the greater of 6’ or 2/3 (Height) of the proposed exterior wall for side and rear perimeter yards and 20’ for the street front perimeter yard setback. The site plan has 8’ listed as the setback for all property lines which is incorrect. Please update accordingly. 7. Comment: Previous comment 9 not addressed correctly. Please draw, label, and dimension the front street setback from the property line to the proposed garage. The dimension provided is not accurate per the scale provided. 8. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming depending on responses to zoning review comments and plans submitted. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 03/05/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |