Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Permit Number - TC-RES-0123-02407
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2023 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 01/27/2023 | Site Landscape | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 02/22/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/21/2023 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. An unvented roof assembly requires an air-impermeable rigid insulation material with a minimum R-5 value applied correctly to either side of the roof sheathing, R806.5. Show a roof design with insulation types and minimum thickness for meeting the condensation control requirement and the minimum total insulation value of R-38 or R-30 when extended over the wall top plate for additions under 500 SF. 2. Show the proposed fixture as full cut-off FCO style or provide an Outdoor Lighting Calculation including all exterior fixtures on the property for determining exterior lighting limits. |
||
| 02/22/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-RES-0123-02407 7682 E Apple Tree Dr. - R-2 Attached Garage/Storage Addition (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: February 22, 2023 Provided a detail comment response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all comments with your next submittal. This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. 1. Based on current aerial photos the provided plot plan does not show all structures. There are two (2) permits, T12CM05607 & T06CM04627, that appear to have been built but the permits were not finaled and the additions are not shown on this plot plan. 2. Provide a dimension from the centerline of Apple Tree Dr to the face of curb, and from the face of curb to the east property line. The distance from centerline to the face of curb is 19’-0” and from the face of curb to the property is 11’-0”. 3. Zoning was not able to find approved permit documents for the existing ramada shown in the southeast corner of the parcel. As the square footage of this ramada wa not provided zoning cannot determine if the ramada requires a building permit or just a compliance review. If this structure is greater than 200 SF a building permit is required, if less than 200 SF a compliance review is needed. As the height was not provided perimeter yard setback requirements cannot be determined. Also no perimeter yard setback dimensions were provided for this ramada but it does not appear that setbacks are meet. The required perimeter yard setbacks for this structure are, six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line. If this structure does not meet setbacks at a minimum a neighbor’s setback waiver will be required. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ If you are unable to secure the setback waive the reduced setbacks can be process through the required Board of Adjustment stated below. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. As a dimension was not provided from design grade to the highest point of the wall Zoning has use the measure feature in Bluebeam and will use a wall height of 16’-8” for determining perimeter yard setback requirements. Provide the correct wall height dimensions on the plan. COMMENTS: The following comments are for the purpose of applying for a variance before the Board of Adjustment (UDC Section 3.10.1). 1. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 16’-8” the required perimeter yard setback to the east property line is 11’-2”, proposed setback is 0’-0”. If you have questions about the Board of Adjustment please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/27/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |