Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Permit Number - TC-RES-0123-01844
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL NEW DWELLING v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 03/23/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/17/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-RES-0123-01844 1008 N Contzen Ave - R-3 New SFR w/Sleeping Quarters (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: March 17, 2023 Provided a detail comment response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all comments with your next submittal. This site is located in the R-3 zone (UDC 4.7.10). A single-family residence (SFR) with sleeping quarters is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6. 1. Per UDC Article 6.6.3.C. Detached accessory buildings, including accessory dwelling units, are not permitted in the buildable area extending the full width of the lot between the principal building and the front street lot line, except for terraces and steps not over three feet high above the natural grade, paved areas, and fences or walls. As the proposed SFR does not meet the minimum 20’-0” street perimeter yard setback to Delong St. Zoning considers Contzen Ave as the front street. That said the sleeping quarters is considered an accessory structure and is not allowed in the front yard. A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required to permit the plans as shown. 2. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. As a dimension was not provided from design grade to the highest point of the wall Zoning cannot verify perimeter yard setback requirements. 3. Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions from the post supporting the proposed porches to the applicable property lines. These structures are required to meet perimeter yard setbacks. 4. It does not appear that the lot coverage calculation is not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.3 and the example shown on the Residential Plot Plan Requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf, and provide a correct lot coverage calculation. 5. There is a carport shown on the west end to the propose SFR on the plot plan but this carport is not shown on the floor plan or elevations. If you have questions about the Board of Adjustment please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/14/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/06/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/23/2023 | Residential Building | REVIEW COMPLETED |