Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.2
Permit Number - TC-MDP-1224-01366
Review Name: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2025 | Residential Building | APPROVED | |||
| 02/06/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/06/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The associated development package TD-DEV-0125-00010 must be approved before this building permit can be approved. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/05/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-MDP-1224-01366 3942 E ELMWOOD ST R-3 Zone New SFR (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 5, 2025 This site is located in the R-3 zone (UDC 4.7.12). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6. Per discussion with Management, the following comments have been made. 1. This comment was not addressed. Until Development Package TD-DEV-0125-00010 is approved by all review agencies Zoning cannot approved these building plans. Comment: The parcels at 3934, 3938, and 3942 E Elmwood St meet the Unified Development Code definition of a site: "The land area consisting of a portion of a lot, an entire lot, or contiguous lots, not including dedicated public property, designated for development as a single entity." The site plan depicts three contiguous lots sharing an access point. A Development Package is required. The Development Package must be approved before the building permit application can be completed by zoning. Please submit a comment response letter to this building permit as it requires a resubmittal. Indicate in your response that an approved Development Package has been obtained. A complete review will be done once a Development Package has been obtained and approved. 2. This comment was not addressed. Zoning acknowledges that the 24’ ingress/egress and utility easement is shown on the plan but the proposed sidewalk is not fully within the easement. Comment: The easement dimension width does not match the easement dimension found as approved on the Final Plat TD-DIV-1123-00128. The pedestrian circulation sidewalk should be constructed within the easement, not over the driveways for safety purposes. COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a wall height measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Where the wall meets the eave of the roof. TC-MDP-1224-01366 3942 E ELMWOOD ST: The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). 1. Based on a wall height of 12’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed SFR to the north and south property line is 8’-4”, proposed setback to the north property line is 6’-8” and to the south property line is 6’-9”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov”. The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 01/24/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |