Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.1
Permit Number - TC-MDP-0524-00638
Review Name: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/17/2024 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 06/05/2024 | Fire New Construction | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 06/20/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/10/2024 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit Review TC-MDP-0524-00638 (1810 E SILVER ST TUCSON, AZ 85719) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2018 International Residential Code (IRC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC). 1. Clarify the pipe diameter at the point of connection of the new cold-water line and the existing service pipes. Existing water pipes may require replacement with larger sizes for controlling excessive water flow rates, P2903.7. A minimum 3/4” pipe is required for supplying water to the new ADU bathroom/kitchen group fixtures. 2. Show the water service pipe size with sufficient capacity for controlling excessive flow rates by including a water fixture total for both buildings, P2903.6. The proposed location adds developed length to the existing water distribution. A minimum 1” service pipe is required for supplying water to more than 9.5 fixture units. 3. Provide the existing sewer line size, P3005.4.2, and show it is sufficient for both new and existing drainage. 4. Provide elevation measurements for Next Upstream Manhole cover and Finished Floor Elevation. Provide Backwater valve protection as/if required. 5. Backwater valve protection: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/building-code/2018_-_irc_amendments.pdf Section P3008.1 Where required. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover in the sewer, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/11/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-MDP-0524-00638 6174 E SENECA ST. – R-1 1810 E SILVER ST (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence w/ an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, 8, & 9 and 6.6.3. 1. The sheet index shows 7 sheets but only 1 was submitted. 2. There is a porch structure that appears on aerial photos some time after 2006. Zoning was not able to find approved permit documents for this structure. Either provide approve permit documents of a separate permit will be required to be submitted and approved prior to this permit. COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a wall height measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Where the wall meets the eave of the roof and or top of parapet. As wall heights from design grade were not provided on model plan TC-MDP-0224-00265 Zoning has added 6” to the heights provided to determine required perimeter yard setbacks. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). 1. As no wall height was provided on Elevation C of model plan TC-MDP-0224-00265 Zoning cannot determine the required perimeter yard setback to the east property line. 2. Based on a wall height of 13’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the ADU to the south property line is 9’-0”, proposed setback is 6’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Wyatt Berger at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/04/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/20/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |