Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.2
Permit Number - TC-MDP-0426-00248
Review Name: SITE FROM MODEL TEMPLATE - INFILL BUILDERS v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2026 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 06/11/2026 | Residential Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TC-MDP-0426-00248 Location: 5302 S MADISON SV UNIT 3 Review Date: 6/11/2026 A Comment Response letter is required. Please address all reviewer’s comments in a separate document with all required documents for resubmittal. Residential Engineering Comments: 1. Same comment as 5302 S MADISON SV UNIT 1 - TC-MDP-0426-00244: Final Plat for this property indicates a 7.5’ utility easement along the North (155.79’) property line and the West (47.26’) property line. The utility easements must be shown on the site plans and structures may not be placed in the easements. Please relocate Unit 3 and Unit 1 to be out of the easement. Final plat can be found here: https://onbase.pima.gov/publicaccess/DS_NextGen_Single/etc/cq/results.html?cqid=240&OBKey__552_1=10013 If you have any questions, please contact Dylan Molina. Dylan.Molina@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/28/2026 | Residential Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Jeffrey W. Cassidy, Planner Planning & Development Services Department – Current Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-MDP-0426-00248 – Residential Building – RBC SFR Model 1334 sf - 3 bed 2 bath (Model Master Plan TC-MDP-1225-00770) 5302 S MADISON SV Unit 3 TUCSON, AZ 85706 (R-1 Zoning) Site Plan Review – 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 28, 2026 This site is in the R-1 Residence Zone (UDC 4.7.8). Middle Housing is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) per Use specific standards 4.9.7.B.4-.6, .8, & .9. Plan review for the above referenced SFR, as part of a middle housing project, has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. For facilitating a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued. 1. COMMENT: There are several trees in conflict with the ordinance requirements, and one Texas Ranger is incorrectly located in the City right of way (off the property). A. Address the following: 1. A 5’-0” wide strip of vegetative groundcover is required within the front yard setback per the calculation below (minus the sections that have a driveway and/or pedestrian sidewalk (from the street sidewalk to the units’ front entrance). Parcels with less than 30 lineal feet of street frontage may place the required ground cover in alternate locations indicated on the site plan. (X Linear feet of Street Frontage) – (Y curb cut width) x (5 Foot Depth) = Z Square Feet of required vegetative groundcover. This standard is partially addressed, only in note form. Graphically depict the location 5’-0” wide groundcover bed and acknowledge the specific plants used and quantity. 2. Plants must be low to very low water use with a hardiness rating of 15 degrees Fahrenheit or lower and non-invasive. Options are listed in Section 5-02.5.0 of the Technical Standards Manual. Exceptions to these criteria or plants that are not listed in Section 5-02.5.0 of the Technical Standards Manual, may be approved by the PDSD Landscape Architect. B. Required landscaping must be located as follows: 1. Required landscaping is not restricted to the first 10 feet onto the property from the existing or future right-of-way line. 2. Trees shall be placed a minimum of ten feet from the center of the tree trunk to any enclosed structure and utility lines (overhead, underground). 3. Trees shall be placed a minimum of five feet from the back of the sidewalk or curb. If this standard cannot be met, then root barriers are required and must be illustrated on the submitted construction plans. 4. Trees must be planted in a six-to-nine-inch depressed planting area of at least 50 square feet (four-foot radius, or alternatives as proposed) and at least ten feet away from a building foundation. 2. COMMENT: The site plan provided is incomplete. Specifically: A. Three SFR’s are depicted on the site plan. Demarcate each building by their permit AND model numbers and add the language “under separate permit” to the two residences not affiliated with this TC-MDP-0426-00248 specifically. B. Per UDC 11.3.7.A.3., the definition of Middle Housing is as follows: A building or buildings with two to four dwelling units on a site, including townhomes, excluding Accessory dwelling units. Zoning acknowledges the two dwelling units east of the proposed SFR are under model ADU permits. Adjust ALL language referring to ADU or accessory dwelling unit to read as SFR on this middle housing permit set. C. Regarding the property to the north, add the following zoning label: PIMA COUNTY CI-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSING ZONE. 3. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on responses to Zoning and other PDSD reviewer comments. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: 1. Corrected building permit 2. Provide a detailed response letter (clarification narrative) with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all Zoning comments. 3. Resubmit ALL documents associated with this permit (all drawings in sheet index) To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/old-pdfs/double-old/resubmittals.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact jeffrey.cassidy@tucsonaz.gov The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code |
||
| 05/27/2026 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 06/08/2026 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |