Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: SHIPPING CONTAINER v.2
Permit Number - TC-FBB-0424-00054
Review Name: SHIPPING CONTAINER v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/11/2024 | Residential Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS 2nd review TC-FBB-0424-00054 Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. For facilitating a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2018 International Residential Code, 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. 2018 International Building Code. 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions, and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 3. When resubmitting please separate support documents and spec sheets from the construction plan set and place them into separate files, R106.1. For example Manual J calculations Comment partially remains and is expanded. Please separate the comment response letter and the construction drawings, and submit each as a separate document. 4. Each dwelling unit with kitchen requires a separate Pima County assigned street address after Zoning approval, R319. Show Pima County assigned unit numbers at each dwelling on the site plan. https://www.pima.gov/1010/Addressing-Frequently-Asked-Questions Comment remains and is expanded: Please obtain an address for the new ADU. Provide the address for the existing home and the new ADU on the Sheet A0.0 Site Plan PLUMBING PLANS: A. Sheet P1.0: Please provide water heater manufacturer’s cut sheet with next submittal. R106.1.1 Comment remains: Please provide water heater manufacturer’s cut sheet with next submittal. R106.1.1 ELECTRICAL PLANS: 9. Sheet E0.0: Please amend plans as UFFER does not appear to be possible, as no footings are 20 feet in length. Please provide a grounding electrode system such as two ground rods per E3608.1.4 and E3608.3.4.1 and show on electrical riser diagram. IRC R106.1.1 New Comment from second review: Keep in mind two ground rods a minimum of 6 feet apart will work or Please specify and note on plan: Metal underground water pipe. E3608.1.1 A metal underground water pipe that is in direct contact with the earth for 10 feet or more, including any well casing effectively bonded to the pipe and that is electrically continuous, or made electrically continuous by bonding around insulating joints or insulating pipe to the points of connection of the grounding electrode conductor and the bonding conductors, shall be considered as a grounding electrode E3608.1.1 Grounds E3608.1.4.1 The rod and pipe electrodes shall be installed such that at least 8 feet of length is in contact with the soil. They shall be driven to a depth of not less than 8 feet except that, where rock bottom is encountered, electrodes shall be driven at an oblique angle not to exceed 45 degrees from the vertical or shall be buried in a trench that is at least 30 inches deep. The upper end of the electrodes shall be flush with or below ground level except where the above-ground end and the grounding electrode conductor attachment are protected against physical damage. (250.53(G)] Mark Masek Plans Examiner – Building Safety Planning and Development Services | City of Tucson main 520.837.4994 email mark.masek@tucsonaz.gov Submit a corrected plan set at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd |
||
| 06/27/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-FBB-0424-00054 234 E ADAMS ST. – NR-2 Convert Shipping Container to ADU (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 27, 2024 This comment was not addressed. COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. This site is located in the NR-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A single-family residence (SFR) with and accessory dwelling unit (ADU) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10 & 6.6.3. 2. This comment was not addressed. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a wall height measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Provide height dimension form design grade to top of container on the elevations. 3. This comment was not addressed. Based on the wall height of 9’-6” provided within the footprint of the building the required perimeter yard setback to the south and west property line is 6’-4”, proposed setback is 6’-0’. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-Zoning-Applications/Zoning-Administration. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Wyatt Berger at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or Georgia Pennington at Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov. 4. This comment was not addressed. As you are relocating the existing shed provide the wall height for the west wall so that perimeter yard setback requirements can be verified. 5. This comment was not addressed. The lot coverage calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 6.4.3.C.1.a Roofed areas, porches, open on at least one side are not included in the calculation and per UDC Article 6.4.3.B.3.b Vehicular use areas, measured within the outside edges of any area allocated to vehicle use, whether improved or unimproved are included in the lot coverage. 6. Per Gabriel Sleighter no NPZ review is required. The Unified Development Code (UDC) can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Codes/Zoning-Code. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 06/06/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |