Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-1224-02386
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2025 | Commercial Mechanical | APPROVED | Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 4/2/2025 9:38:08 AM |
||
| 04/17/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/07/2025 | Commercial Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/4/2025 10:53:31 AM Comments below were distributed on January 18, 2025. The structural responses by Grenier Engineering, Inc dated February 17, 2025 are acceptable to close all open comments. However, the uploaded drawings "CONS-Sub 2 - Harrison Townhomes - Combined_25_0328_v2.pdf" do not include updated structural drawings. Please provide new drawings that incorporate the revisions by Grenier Engineering. 1. ACKNOWLEDGED 2. RESOLVED 3. SHEET S1.6 - CONFIRM HEADER SIZE: Per the Wood Header Schedule on Sheet S1.6, Header Type "H-2" shall be (3) 6x12 built-up beam. This is an atypical beam size and will require a special detail to confirm how the three laminations are fastened together. Please confirm the design and resubmit. 4. SHEET S1.7 - DETAIL ILLEGIBLE: Due to the plot settings for Sheet S1.7, Detail 50/S1.6 is not legible. Please reprint this sheet and resubmit for review. 5. SHEET S5.1 - PARAPET DESIGN: The typical roof framing Details 301, 302 & 306 on Sheet S5.1 show the building parapet as a continuation of the 2x stud wall below. Detail 304 shows the parapet framing being built into the prefabricated roof truss (designed by others). Please amend these details to state the maximum parapet height that the walls have been designed for and the maximum parapet height that the truss manufacturer shall design for. Building(B) Reviewer (from previous submittal TUC9647001.123124) Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 1/21/2025 1:35:53 PM |
||
| 04/07/2025 | Commercial Electrical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/1/2025 12:42:10 PM 1. E2.1 UNIT A1 & A1-TYPE A - ELECTRICAL PLANS: Comment only, Heat pump and fan coil units have oversized conductors for CB selection. Not addressed, but not an NEC violation. 2. E2.2 UNIT B1 & B1 TYPE A - ELECTRICAL PLANS: Could not locate Keynote 4 on Unit B1 Type A. Addressed 3. E2.4 UNIT C1 - ELECTRICAL PLAN: Need to call out conductor sizes for Heat Pump CU-C2 and Fan oil unit FC-C2. Not addressed, CU-C2 still shown plan and on the same circuit as CU-C1. 4. E3.1 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMS: Main Meter Pak shall have a Main disconnect (Circuit breaker is suggested) for over 6 disconnects/units per NEC 230.71. Not Addressed, Meter pak still does not have an MCB as per response. 5. E3.1 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMS: Main Meter Pak shows all units with a 150 amp meter circuit breaker. However, some of the units have 125 A MLO panels. Need to upsize panels or reduce size of affected meter circuit breakers (or call out to reference details on this sheet). Addressed 6. E3.2 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMS: Is missing from drawing set. Please confirm it has been removed or provided with next submittal. Addressed |
||
| 04/07/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/6/2025 12:14:51 PM Second Plumbing Review: Unresolved-1). GENERAL PLUMBING PLANS: Work Scope states 2 of the buildings are 2 stories in height, none of sanitary or water piping configurations show riser diagrams that would correlate to a 2 story piping configuration. Add piping configurations for the typical 2 story units. -2018 IPC 106.3.1 **there isn't a plan page P1.1 included in either plan set, please provide plan page P1.1, as stated in response comments & listed on plan page A0.0** 2). Plan page A0.0 sheet index: missing plan sheet P1.1 as listed on sheet index. Add plan sheet P1.1 to the plan set. -2018 IPC 106.3.1 |
||
| 04/07/2025 | Outdoor Lighting | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 4/1/2025 12:42:10 PM 1. E2.1 UNIT A1 & A1-TYPE A - ELECTRICAL PLANS: Comment only, Heat pump and fan coil units have oversized conductors for CB selection. Not addressed, but not an NEC violation. 2. E2.2 UNIT B1 & B1 TYPE A - ELECTRICAL PLANS: Could not locate Keynote 4 on Unit B1 Type A. Addressed 3. E2.4 UNIT C1 - ELECTRICAL PLAN: Need to call out conductor sizes for Heat Pump CU-C2 and Fan oil unit FC-C2. Not addressed, CU-C2 still shown plan and on the same circuit as CU-C1. 4. E3.1 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMS: Main Meter Pak shall have a Main disconnect (Circuit breaker is suggested) for over 6 disconnects/units per NEC 230.71. Not Addressed, Meter pak still does not have an MCB as per response. 5. E3.1 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMS: Main Meter Pak shows all units with a 150 amp meter circuit breaker. However, some of the units have 125 A MLO panels. Need to upsize panels or reduce size of affected meter circuit breakers (or call out to reference details on this sheet). Addressed 6. E3.2 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMS: Is missing from drawing set. Please confirm it has been removed or provided with next submittal. Addressed |
||
| 04/17/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TC-COM-1224-02386 9575 E SPEEDWAY BL Site engineering comments are as follows: 1. TC-COM-1224-02386 cannot be approved until TD-DEV-1224-00348 is approved by all reviewers. UDC Article 3.3.3.7.a 2. Ryan Insalaco – ryan.insalaco@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/09/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: BLDG 1 = TC-COM-1224-02386, BLDG 2 = TC-COM-1224-02410, BLDG 3 = TC-COM-1224-02412, BLDG 4 = TC-COM-1224-02413, BLDG 5 = TC-COM-1224-02415, BLDG 6 = TC-COM-1224-02417, BLDG 7 = TC-COM-1224-02418, BLDG 8 = TC-COM-1224-02420, BLDG 9 = TC-COM-1224-02421, BLDG 10 = TC-COM-1224-02422, BLDG 11 = TC-COM-1224-02424, BLDG 12 = TC-COM-1224-02425, BLDG 13 = TC-COM-1224-02426, BLDG 14 = TC-COM-1224-02427, BLDG 15 = TC-COM-1224-02428, BLDG 16 = TC-COM-1224-02429, BLDG 17 = TC-COM-1224-02430, BLDG 18 = TC-COM-1224-02431, BLDG 19 = TC-COM-1224-02432, BLDG 20 = TC-COM-1224-02433 - TD-DEV-1224-00348 9575 E SPEEDWAY BL. - C-1 Multifamily (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 20, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in C-1 zone (UDC 4.7.20). Multifamily Use is a permitted use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4) 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with Development Package (DP) TD-DEV-1224-00324 and although the plans appear to comply, until the DP is approved by all review agencies Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 2. Per Rezoning TP-MOD-0424-000003 condition 6.a the maximum height is 25’ as measured from design grade to the highest peak of the roof. None of the height dimensions provided on the building elevation are from design grade and building D appears to exceed the allowed 25’. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 03/28/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |