Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1224-02380
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2025 | Commercial Electrical | APPROVED | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 12/31/2024 12:31:39 PM 1. E1.2 ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: Should have provided a Tucson City Exterior lighting calculation (this is not an Exterior lighting Comcheck calculation). However, Photometrics and exterior lighting comcheck do provide enough information to show compliance for this reviewer. 2. E7.0 PANEL SCHEDULES: Spare Capacity calculations for all panels are incorrect. Calculation provides Capacity of panel amps used (not spare capacity). Comment applies to all panels. |
||
| 01/10/2025 | Outdoor Lighting | APPROVED | Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Approved with Comments Reason: Date Completed : 12/31/2024 12:31:39 PM 1. E1.2 ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: Should have provided a Tucson City Exterior lighting calculation (this is not an Exterior lighting Comcheck calculation). However, Photometrics and exterior lighting comcheck do provide enough information to show compliance for this reviewer. 2. E7.0 PANEL SCHEDULES: Spare Capacity calculations for all panels are incorrect. Calculation provides Capacity of panel amps used (not spare capacity). Comment applies to all panels. |
||
| 01/15/2025 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 01/21/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/10/2025 | Commercial Building | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/10/2025 6:28:39 PM 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. GENERAL - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: Please provide a copy of the site-specific geotechnical report referenced in the structural general notes. The report should support the appropriateness of the selected foundation system for the project site. All submitted geotechnical reports must be dated no later than five years from the submittal date. Outdated reports must be accompanied by a letter from a qualified geotechnical engineer stating that the report requirements are still valid, or stating what items may have changed. All building code references must be updated to the current code adopted by the City. 3. SHEET S1.1 & W-3.1 - PRE-MANUFACTURED CANOPY: The engineer of record has indicated a pre-manufactured canopy by others to be installed over the plan-west entrance to the building. They've indicated that connections for the canopy must be coordinated with the SIP Panel manufacturer. Please update Sheet W-3.1 to show the canopy and include any details required for connection. 4. SHEETS W-5.3 thru W-5.4 - CONFIRM PARAPET CONNECTIONS: Details 24, 28, 29 & 32 on Sheets W-5.3 and W5.4 show proposed 2x4 and 2x6 kickers supporting parapet SIP panels in various conditions. In all cases, kickers are secured by a combination of toe-nails into a continuous ledger and OSB sheathing that is fastened into these ledgers with nails at 6"oc. These kickers are anticipated to be loaded in both tension and compression, depending on the direction of the wind. Please confirm that these connections have been checked for pull-out of the nails and are sufficient to resist wind in both directions. [Written confirmation from the engineer is required to satisfy this comment. Please refer to the first comment above.] 5. SHEET W-5.4 - CONFIRM GEOMETRY: Structural Details 28/W-5.4 and Building Section A/W-4.0 are cut at the same location at the building's front elevation. However, these details show conflicting conditions wherein the exterior wall is shown either flush with the parapet above or set back with roof trusses cantilevering over the top. Please confirm which geometry is correct and revise the details to be consistent. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 1/6/2025 10:45:35 AM |
||
| 01/10/2025 | Commercial Mechanical | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 1/8/2025 4:30:42 PM 1. General - Provide Heat Load calculations. Show all O/A loads on the calculations. Confirm all Sensible/Latent Loads as per units designed on plans. - 2018 IECC Section C403.1.1 Calculation of heating and cooling loads. 2. Plan Sheet M1.2.2 - 2018 IECC LOAD SUMMARY Schedule states on the Provided Equipment Cooling Capacity (MBH) 94 MBH total. Carrier Website for unit 50FE-M08 - 7.5 tons, 86 MBH. Confirm BTUH for design RTUs. - 2018 IECC Section C103.2Information on construction documents. - 2018 IBC Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. i. Carrier Website Data; https://www.carrier.com/commercial/en/us/products/packaged-outdoor/outdoorpackaged-units/50fe/ ▪ 50FE AHRI Ratings a,b,c,d ▪ 50FE-M08 UNIT - COOLING STAGES (2) - NOMINAL CAPACITY (7.5 tons) - NET COOLING CAPACITY (86 MBH) - TOTAL Heater Power (7.5 kW) - (11.4 EER) - (15.2 IEER) WITH 2-SPEED INDOOR FAN MOTOR - AHRI RATING CFM 2650 - AHRI PART LOAD CFM 1575. 3. Plan Sheet M1.2.2 - Provide on the Rooftop Unit Schedule Total BTUH, Sensible BTUH. - 2018 IECC Section C103.2Information on construction documents. - 2018 IBC Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. |
||
| 01/10/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 12/29/2024 10:33:24 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). Plan Page A1.7: Missing Roof Drainage Method. Add roof drainage method with calculations. -2018 IPC 1101.2, 1106.1, 1106.2, 1106.3, 1106.6, 1108 2). Plan Page A1.7: Missing location of adjacent secondary scuppers. Add adjacent secondary scuppers. -2018 IPC 1106.5. 1108 3). Plan Page P1.1: Missing location of adjacent secondary scuppers. Add adjacent secondary scuppers. -2018 IPC 1106.5. 1108 4). Plan page P1.1.1 detail 2: add note for indirect waste piping that exceeds distances listed in -2018 IPC 802.3 will need to be trapped. 5). Plan page P1.3: Water system detail is missing backflow protection for the H201 Oven water connection. Add backflow protection for the H201 Oven water connection. -2018 IPC 608.3 6). Plan pages P1.1.1 & P1.2: Grease laden waste needs to discharge to the grease system. The H201 Oven floor sink needs to connect to the grease system, -2018 IPC 1003.1 |
||
| 01/21/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The associated development package TD-DEV-0924-00264 must be approved by all reviewers before this building permit can be approved. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/17/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-1224-02380 - TD-DEV-0924-00264 10290 E TANQUE VERDE RD. – C-1 General Merchandise Sales (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: January 17, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the C-1 zone (UDC 4.7.20). General Merchandise Sales, excluding Large Retail Establishment is an allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4), subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with Development Package (DP) TD-DEV-0924-00264 and although the basic design appears to match the following comments need to be addressed. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved by all review agencies. 2. Ensure that all site details provided in the building plan set match the details within the DP. 3. If you include any of the DP sheets in the building set, except for the utility sheets, they shall either be the stamped approved plans or marked as for reference only. 4. The overall dimensions provided on sheet A1.2 do not match what is shown on DP sheet 4. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 01/09/2025 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | The following items apply to the proposed project: 1.The fuel tanks and system require a separate submittal 2. The fuel system requires a Flammable and Combustible materials Operational permit. Contact Jesus.silva@tucsonsz.gov for Information 3. The Co2 system requires a separate submittal for operational permit 4. Install fire extinguishers as required per the 2024 IFC Section 906 5. Fire alarms and Fire Sprinklers requires a separate submittal and permit. is you have any questions regarding the requirements listed contact Sal.erivezjr@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/27/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |