Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-1222-00377
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/30/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-1222-00377 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: DENIED 1. Refer to Structural Calculations package submitted. The Enercalc printout for RTU Support Framing shows that the Member 2x8 is failing in deflection. Verify and submit your response. 2. Refer to Structural Drawing S111. This drawing shows Footing Mark B on the Footing Schedule. Locate Footing Mark B on Plan. 3. Refer to Structural Drawing S571. The Structural steel, components and fasteners that are exposed are to be protected against corrosion in accordance with AISC 360 Section B.13 as indicated in IBC 2018 Section 2203.1. 4. Provide galvanized bolts on the members framing connections that are galvanized. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: DENIED 1. Please provide the license expiration dates on the plans for both Arizona Registered Architects. 2. Clarify how this is a mixed-use occupancy type, based on the description this appears to be a M use only. 3. Clarify that door 115-002 for the man-trap exit has a minimum of 12” on the latch side, it appears that the structural column may be encroaching per ICC A117.1 404.2.3.2. 4. Provide insulation and window values on the drawings that are in accordance with IECC C402. 5. Indicate the location of emergency light on the exterior at the exit doors to illuminate the landings. Coordinate with the electrical plans. 2018 IBC 1008.3.2 (5). 6. Indicate the location of the emergency lighting/ wall packs on the plan. Coordinate with the electrical plans. 2018 IBC 1017.2. 7. Indicate the location of all “night lighting” on the plans in the office area for egress illumination or indicate light sensors will be used. All rooms and usable floor surfaces in a building shall be equipped with artificial lighting and shall be illuminated at all times that the space is occupied. Coordinate with the electrical plans. 2018 IBC 1008.2. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: DENIED 1. In your RTU schedule provide how much outside air your bringing in cfm's sheet M611 (IMC2018,106.3.1) 2. Provide ventilation calculation table (IMC2018,403.3.1.1.1) ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS DENIED E001 ELECTRICAL NOTES, LEGENDS, & MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS: No electrical issues E111 POWER PLAN: No electrical issues E121 LIGHTING PLAN: Need to provide an interior lighting Comcheck to show IECC compliance. Need to show exterior lighting/lumen calculations as require by the City of Tucson. These are typically hand calculations to show exterior lumens and that they do not exceed City of Tucson requirements. E151 ROOF POWER PLAN: Should upsize Disconnect for RTU-2 to 60 amp as CB feeding circuit is 35 amp or reduce CB to 30 amp to avoid any local electrical inspector issues. E611 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM & PANEL SCHEDULE: Need to call out all conductors on Circuit breakers larger than 20 amps. Specifically, RTU 1 & 2, and for the subpanel B if it was not an existing panel. It is suggested to include the conductors and conduit sizes on the Panel schedule description Load Name column. Demand factor for lighting shall be at 125% per NEC requirements. Comment only: HVAC demand can be derated. Typical value is 80%, consult with Mech EOR for better estimate. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: DENIED First Plumbing Review: 1). Hot water piping to L2 sink needs to recirculate. -IPC 607.2 ( or suggest install point of use water heater beneath L2 sink) If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/01/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The Development Package needs to be approved before the building plans can be approved. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/01/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-1222-00377 225 W GRANT RD Zoning C-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE:February 1, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1.COMMENT: Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A development package (DP) meeting the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06 must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this building plan. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans and is submitted at: https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/. The DP will need to be approved prior to approval of this building permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/13/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/12/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |