Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1125-02123
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/17/2025 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/25/2025 | Addressing Validation | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The unit number on the permit location (1109) does not match the unit number on the uploaded documents (1105). Please either correct the address on the uploaded documents and resubmit after other reviews are complete or submit a change of address request in the permit sub-records. Here are instructions on how to withdraw in subrecords: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/withdraws-an… If you have questions please contact me at Drew.Szentesy@tucsonaz.gov or contact the Building Official at Building_Official@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/16/2025 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Please submit your revised documents and provide a letter with a written response letter addressing each of the comments indicating how the Review comments were resolved. Additionally, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Please note the submittal was incomplete and the plan review was conducted using the information presented. The subsequent review could generate more comments after original comments have been addressed. 1. Sheet A: Please amend the drawing Sheet Index to provide a list that includes all the drawing sheets in this permit’s scope. IBC 107.2.1. For example, sheet A1.4 is in the plan set and not included in the sheet index. Please treat this as a typical note and check the index against the submitted drawings. 2. Sheets S1.1, S2.1, S3.1: Please ensure designer’s seal, signature, and date signed on all sheets. IBC 107.1 Please contact me if you have any questions about these comments. Mark Masek Plans Examiner – Building Safety Planning and Development Services | City of Tucson main 520.837.4994 email mark.masek@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/04/2025 | Commercial Electrical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Commercial Electrical Review TC-COM-1125-02123 (1109 W GLENN ST TUCSON, AZ 85705) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC). 1. The provided plans are missing Sheet E1.0. 2. Clarify the branch-circuit notations as shown on the Enlarged Electrical Power Plan, REF sheet E2.0. The circuit connections and circuit start points appear to indicate that Multi-Wire Branch Circuits are being used. For instance the notation L1-16,18,20 for office power may indicate a multi-wire branch circuit for power. 3. Multi-wire branch circuits require the following: 210.4(B) Simultaneously disconnect all ungrounded conductors. 240.15(B)(1) Identified handle ties. Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/16/2025 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Show how one of the “Additional Efficiency Package Options” (C406, IECC 2018) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2018. | ||
| 12/16/2025 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide information to show how the proposed water heater is to be supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2018. 2. Show how the water pipes located in the canopy are to be protected from freezing. Reference: Section 305.4, IPC 2018. 3. Provide tempered water for the lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 419.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2018. 4. Provide an approved vacuum relief valve for the scheduled bottom-fed water heater that is located above the fixture outlets. Reference: Section 504.2, IPC 2018. 5. Provide a detail showing that the water heaters located above the ceilings will have adequate access and maintenance space. Reference: Sections 502.3 and 502.5, IPC 2018 and Article 210.70 (c), NEC 2017. 6. Provide a watertight pan of galvanized steel, aluminum, or other approved material under the water heater with a drain to an approved location. Reference: Section 504.7, IPC 2018. |
||
| 12/17/2025 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Resolve building review comments. Please note Fire Sprinkler, and Fire Alarm submittals require separate permit through TFD. Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/04/2025 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Outdoor Lighting Review TC-COM-1125-02123 (1109 W GLENN ST TUCSON, AZ 85705) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2018 International Building Code (IBC), 2017 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC). Outdoor Lighting Review: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf a. Show lamps with a maximum of 3500K color temperature, OLC 402.1. Fixture ‘SJ’ is shown with a color temperature of 4000K, which exceeds the maximum allowed. Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/26/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TC-COM-1125-02123 Location: 1109 W GLENN ST Review Date: 11/26/2025 Site Engineering Comments: 1. The construction plans show the canopy at a height of 22-feet but the associated development package TD-DEV-0223-00141 shows the proposed canopy as 19-feet in height. Revise the commercial building plans to match the associated approved development package. If it is decided that this is the height desired/intended, then a revision to the development package will be required. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Marco Contreras Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/12/2025 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons Zoning Section Review PROJECT: TC-COM-1125-02123 - TD-DEV-0223-00141 1109 W. Glenn St. Tucson, AZ 85705; I-1 Commercial office – canopy structure (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/12/2025 This site is zoned I-1 (UDC 4.7.29). Construction Service is a permitted use subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.13.Q. Comments: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: The associated Development Package (TD-DEV-0223-00141) lists the height of the proposed building as 19’ however the Commercial building permit (TC-COM-1125-02123) lists the proposed height as 22’. The dimensions provided including heights on the development package need to match the associated building permit. Either revise the height to match the approved Development Package or revise TD-DEV-0223-00141 to match the associated building plans. 2. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming depending on responses to zoning review comments and plans submitted. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 12/16/2025 | Water - PDSD Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Clarify the size of the proposed water meter and reduced pressure backflow assembly. The plumbing drawings show a 1” meter, a 1-1/4” reduced pressure backflow assembly, and a 1-1/2” water service pipe. The development plan, however, calls for a 1-1/2” water meter, a 1-1/2” reduced pressure backflow assembly, and a 1-1/2”water service pipe. | ||
| 11/24/2025 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |