Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1123-02615
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/06/2023 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 12/06/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/30/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 11/29/2023 6:00:51 PM 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. GENERAL - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: Please have the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge of this project complete and return the City of Tucson Special Inspections Certificate with signatures. The form can be downloaded at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/city-services/planning-developmentservices/documents/special_inspection_certificate.pdf 3. S1.1/S1.2 - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: The structural general notes indicate that special inspections are required for cold-formed steel framing and steel deck installation. Please provide additional information on the specific type and frequency (periodic, continuous) of inspection required. 4. S2.1 - SLAB ON GRADE: On the Foundation Plan, Key Note 5 specifies a new 4" concrete slab on grade. Please specify the rebar size and spacing required to reinforce this new slab. 5. GENERAL - DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: The following structural design information shall be included in the construction documents per 2018 IBC Section 1603. Please include the following items in the structural general notes. i. Risk category ii. Roof live load iii. Roof snow load, Pg iv. Wind design data a. Wind speed, Vult b. Exposure category c. Internal pressure coefficient d. Design wind pressures for exterior component and cladding materials, expressed in psf v. Seismic design data a. Seismic importance factor, Ie b. Site class (assumed) c. Mapped spectral response acceleration parameters, Ss and S1 d. Design spectral response acceleration parameters, SDS and SD1 e. Seismic design category f. Basic seismic-force resisting system(s) g. Design base shear(s) h. Seismic response coefficient(s), Cs i. Response modification coefficient(s), R j. Analysis procedure used 6. S3.1 - MECHANICAL UNIT: Structural Roof Plan S3.1 differs from the Mechanical Roof Plan M1.0 and Architectural Roof Plan, A3.0, on the location of rooftop unit AC 3 (1,550 lb). Please coordinate the final location of this unit and confirm that the existing roof framing provides sufficient support. 7. S4.1 - FOUNDATION EMBEDMENT: The structural general notes specify a minimum embedment of 2'-0" for shallow foundations below finished grade (Ref. "Foundations", Sheet S1.1). However, Detail 110 specifies a minimum of 12" embedment for a typical concrete turndown at the building edge. Please confirm which note controls and revise as needed. 8. S5.1 - FRAMING DETAIL: Please provide a specification for the clip shown anchoring the existing wood beam on Detail 204. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 11/29/2023 12:13:00 PM 1. Sheet G1.2: UL fire resistance rated assemblies typically are comprised of proprietary materials to achieve a complete assembly. Revise the entire assembly (UL U419) on this sheet to reflect the current assembly listed by UL. The current UL listed assembly is dated November 14, 2023. 2. Sheet G2.1:The occupant load factor used for the fitness area is incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation in accordance with 2018 IBC Table 1004.5. 3. Sheet G2.1:The occupant load factor used for the lockers room is incorrect. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation in accordance with 2018 IBC Table 1004.5. 4. Sheet G2.1: The occupant load for the waiting areas are incorrect. Unconcentrated table and chairs are not provided. It is chairs only. Provide a corrected occupant load calculation in accordance with 2018 IBC Table 1004.5. 5. Sheet G2.1: The code analysis floor plan does not indicate egress measurements. Provide detailed maximum travel distances and common path of travel measurements in accordance with 2018 IBC Table 1017.2. 6. Sheet A2.0: The reflected ceiling plan does indicate the locations of exit lighting. Provide the location of all exit lighting in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1013. 7. Sheet A2.0: The reflected ceiling plan does indicate the locations of egress illumination. Provide the location of all exit illumination in accordance with 2018 IBC Section 1008. 8. Sheet A9.0: Wall Type #1 indicates a listed assembly (U465) for this wall type. However, the listed assembly does not match the listed assemblies provided. Correlate all listed assemblies used in this project. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 11/21/2023 6:56:02 PM Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 11/28/2023 10:58:26 AM Electrical Review of D&P Surgery By: Ron Ross PE ep602 panel schedules: WIRE/GRD and COND columns information all swapped on left side and swapped on most of right side. ep701 single line diagram: Keyed Note 4 does not show size of Grounding Electrode Conductor as indicated. Provide grounding conductor size for each location. Confirm for Keyed Note #6 that a 3 pole ATS is sufficient. Often a separate source of power for these types of applications requires a separate neutral ie a 4 pole ATS. tm11 nurse call floor plan: Could not locate Keyed Note 2. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 11/29/2023 11:13:54 PM First plumbing Review: 1). Roof Drainage sizing table on A3.0 is missing information for several roof areas. -IPC 1106.2. 1106.3, 1106.5, 1108 2). Add Gas riser Diagram to plumbing pages for clarity - IFGC 106.3.1 3). Add gas sizing table used to plan pg. P1.2 -IFGC 402.3 4). Add Water heater manufacturer name & Model to Plan page P2.0 - IPC 501.5 5). Plumbing pages missing Primary & secondary Roof drain conductor illustrations along with sizing calculations as stated on plan page A3.0 -IPC 1106.2 6). Plan page P2.0 schedule missing roof drains & overflow info -IPC 1102.6 |
||
| 11/15/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-1123-02615– Tenant Improvement Building Plan Review (1st Review) 5101 N Oracle Rd / C-3 Zone TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/15/2023 1.COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the associated Development Package TD-DEV-1023-00433. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the TI on the next submittal to ensure consistency with the Development Package. Resubmittal instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Iman Monshizadeh at (520) 837-4082 or by email Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/22/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/14/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |