Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1122-00193
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/14/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-1122-00193 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: APPROVED BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: DENIED 1. Sheet A0.2: Provide additional clarification of the use and the programs of the building. It appears based on the information provided that it may fall into an I-1 occupancy class. Ensure all applicable requirements of Section 420 are addressed. Indicate the level of self preservation of the clients. It is recommended to use the IEBC for this project. One is free to use either the IBC and IEBC but not both, unless specifically referenced by the IEBC. If the IEBC is the desired approach, one must choose 1 of 4 compliance paths. These compliance paths cannot be used in combination with each other in accordance Section 301.3 of the IEBC. It is important to note that the Chapter 3 requirements apply to all compliance methods. i. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements but is also the most conservative approach. ii. Work area compliance method: Chapters 6-12: The work area compliance method provides the greatest number of benefits to the building owner and design professional. This is the easiest route to take. It is much more conservative. iii. Performance compliance method: Chapter 13: This method focuses on what the building is required to do, rather than prescribing how it is to be constructed. This method requires the design profession to work more closely with the owner of the building, as well as the code official, to ensure that design meets specific requirements for the occupants and not simply the prescriptive requirements. iv. Previously adopted code: Section 301.3 Exception 1. This method utilizes a previously adopted code under which the area in question was most recently built or modified; this requires the code official’s approval. Please clearly indicate which compliance method will be chosen and provide a narrative outlining the applicable code requirements. 1. Sheet A0.2: The plans indicate that the structure is sprinklered. Provide the sprinkler system type that is currently installed. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: APPROVED ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS APPROVED PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: APPROVED If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/09/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | You have your occupancy listed as a R-2 a Boarding House non transient. Will you be housing students and or is this more of a congregate care/ assisted living facility. Please clarify if assisted Living and or the proposed operation in your narrative. It appears from conversations that you may be an I-1 condition 1 and not an R-2. Also existing use is a R-1 hotel occupancy. Please add a note that fire alarm and fire sprinkler modifications are required. Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
||
| 01/03/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Zoning Comment | ||
| 12/27/2022 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-1122-00193 1000 S FREEWAY Zoning C-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE:December 27, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1.COMMENT: Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A development package (DP) meeting the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06 must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this building plan. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans and is submitted at: https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/ . The DP will need to be approved prior to approval of this building permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/09/2022 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |