Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-1122-00121
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/24/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-1122-00121 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. In the architectural drawing notes, it states that the exterior walls are to be stripped down to the stud and insulation level, this would trigger a lateral analysis based on wind/ seismic whichever controls the design and based on the analysis, shear panels would need to be provided and shown on the drawing. - Response: Only interior wall finishes and gypsum board is to be removed during demolition. Any plywood sheathing that serves in a structural/shear-resisting role will be preserved in place. Comment D2 on Sheet D101 has been revised to clarify that all plywood sheathing is to remain. Response acceptable, Item Closed 2. In the structural drawings for the roof framing, there is detail provided for strengthening of roof framing members but no supporting calculations are provided for the structural evaluation of existing roof framing for RTU loads and the required structural strengthening of roof members. Response: Structural calculations have been revised by Case Engineering. Updated calculations were not provided for review. Apparently the revised construction drawings got uploaded as Structural Calcs_V2. Review Item OPEN. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved Approved/subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved E100 POWER PLAN: Duplicate Sheet Note #22 with conflicting directions. Correct or combine as required. Sheet Note #9 is used. E102 LIGHTING PLAN ELECTRICAL: Could not locate Sheet Notes 4 and 7. E601 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: May want to upsize CB/conductor for oven tag #20032. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Second Plumbing Review: 1). OK 2). SAME -Add backflow device to espresso & coffee notes #9 & #10 on plan page P101 -IPC 608.17.1 3). OK - Lavatory Faucet hot water & required ASSE 1070 mixing valve installation subject to field inspections. -IPC 607.1, 419.5 4). Now that a new grease interceptor & calculations has been added to plan page P102 the grease interceptor is undersized per Tucson plumbing code Amendments grease interceptor sizing chart 5). OK 6). OK 7). Added Roof drain calculations on plan page A103 are undersized for the 3" with 1/16 slope -IPC 1106.2 B- plan page P102 still needs to show the roof drain conductor pipe sizes -IPC 1106.2 8). Now that the concentric vent has been removed from previous water heater detail, plan page M101 or P101 will need to illustrate the combustion air method- IFGC 304 B- plan page M102 Sheet-note #5's vent location will need to be shown on the correlating mechanical roof plan on the same Page -IFGC 503.1 9). Plan page P102 New grease interceptor calculation DFU value Total for the floor sinks doesn't correlate with the Floor sink DFU calculations Total on the drainage Fixture calculation table on the same page? -IPC 709 10). New Grease interceptor on plan page P102 needs to be vented -IPC 1003.9 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/07/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Zoning Comment | ||
| 03/01/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | FROM: PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: TC-COM-1122-00121 Starbucks (2nd Review) 3700 S 6th Ave – C-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 03/01/2023 Previous zoning comment not addressed. The DP sheets provided in the building plans either need to be the stamped approved DP plan, stamped for reference only or removed from the plan set. For questions regarding Zoning comments, please contact me at: Iman.Monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov |