Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1122-00061
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2022 | Site Zoning | APPROVED | |||
| 12/05/2022 | Site Engineering | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 12/19/2022 | Bldg Permits - Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/16/2022 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Activity Number: TC-COM-1122-00061 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide Lateral Evaluation of exterior walls and floor diaphragm for them to be structurally adequate under the proposed conditions after demolition of exterior walls and openings in the exterior walls and floor diaphragm are made as shown on the demolition plan. 2. Please confirm that if forklifts and other movable equipment are to be used in the proposed facility, appropriate design loads including Impact Loads are to be considered in the structural design (from the submitted calcs it does not seem to be considered). This would also include the design for the new Elevator framing and its pit floor/ footings 3. In the evaluation of roof framing for new RTU's installation shown on sheet 6.02, design engineer recommendation is to locate the new RTU's to within 8 ft off Girder Lines. I could not locate a detail on the structural roof framing plans depicting this recommendation. Please provide this detail and also provide the connection details for the new RTU's to the roof framing members and curbs. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet G1.11 & G1.12: The exit stair shaft located at plan south of the structure is not rated. Provide the necessary rating for the exit stair shaft in accordance with Section 713.4. Additionally, if the stair is being used as an exit access stair, the travel on stairs must be included. Provide clarification or properly rated the stair shaft. 2. Sheet G1.12: The exit located at the plan NW corner appears to be at exit discharge, however, the this is the basement level. Provide clarification about the location of this exit and its exiting strategy. Ensure that this level meets the definition of basement. 3. Sheet G1.12: The exit path located at the plan NW corner exits through an electrical room and would be a higher hazard in accordance with Section 1016.2 #2. 4. General: The special inspection is not signed and stamped by registered design professional. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Duct smoke detector shall be installed in the return duct not the supply duct of HP unit's sheet M3.11 (IMC2018,606.2.1) 2. Provide fire damper at the 1 hour fire rated horizontal floor assembly for the 12" outside air duct penetration between the 2nd and 1st floor sheet M3.11 (IMC2018,607.6.1) 3. Provide 70 cfm of bathroom exhaust to each of the 3 bathroom not 50 (IMC2018,403.3.1.1) sheet M4.11 ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/19/2022 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Resolve building comments. | ||
| 11/15/2022 | PDSD Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |