Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Permit Number - TC-COM-1025-01795
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2026 | Commercial Building Standard | APPROVED | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENT: ACTIVITY NO. TC-COM-1025-01795 ADDRESS/PARCEL: (6444 S FONTANA AV TUCSON, AZ 85706) TC-COM-0526-00787 (3002 E GRANT RD Unit:UNIT 2 TUCSON, AZ 85716) Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Building Review Section comments were addressed. Please paste the review comment individually and enter your response directly below it. Please do this for every comment. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. Should the above not followed, it may delay your approval. Additionally, please submit complete copies of all permit documents (i.e. plans, calculations, reports, etc.) even if they have not been changed. Should you have any questions about these Commercial Building comments, I can be reached at Justin.Eder@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4976. COMMENTS: All previous versions of comments were not followed. Please allow me to paraphrase the requirements. 1. SEPARATE 13 PERMITS a. Please apply for separate permits for each separate grouping of Solar PV System Install. b. Each grouping shall follow the Grouping Letters already present on the drawings. c. This permit TC-COM-1025-01795 shall be designated as Solar PV System – A. The rest of the permits will be given each a letter, continuing with Solar PV System – B all the way to Solar PV System – M. d. This will follow established City Standard permit organization. This will allow organized inspections for each Solar PV System Groupings and will reduce confusions when the City Inspectors conducts the inspections. e. Should you follow the above suggestion, the City of Tucson is willing to create the 12 other permits for you. 2. Please use the Building Address letters from Pima Addressing Department to be used for the 13 permits. This should be obtained/accomplished within the other permit TC-COM-0525-01035, the Modular Storage Units permits. 3. The city can use these current drawings/documents to process Solar PV System – A. I will go ahead and approve my portion of the review for Solar PV System – A. 4. Please confirm if you agree with the above. |
||
| 08/06/2026 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 08/14/2026 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/06/2026 | Commercial Electrical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Commercial electrical Review TC-COM-1025-01795 (6444 S FONTANA AV TUCSON, AZ 85706) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2024 International Building Code (IBC), 2023 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC). https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov 1. Provide a Grounding Electrode System at the detached structure per 250.31(A), 690.47. Grounding electrode system and grounding electrode conductor. Required. 2. Provide appropriate grounding and bonding of all metal structures, per all relevant sections of NEC 250 (example sections 250.4(A), 250.20, 250,32, 250.104, 690.43. 3. Provide grounding/bonding of the Generac Generator per manufacturer’s requirements and NEC 250. 4. Show the Grounding Conductor’s connection at the modules, mounting and metal support structure. NEC 690.43 5. Show the ESS Disconnecting Means, per NEC 706.15. Each battery or group of batteries requires a listed means to disconnect the ESS from all wiring systems. 6. Provide a plaqard or directory for the site and each structure containing PV system or ESS system, per NEC 690.56, 706.15(C), 706.21(B), 710.10. Thes plaquards or directories are required at each building supplied by these systems. 7. Due to the separate PV systems being designed and installed, a separate permit will be required for each PV system. This existing permit can be used as a Mater permit with the combined PV plans covering PV system 2214-A. Additional permits will be required for systems 2214-B through 2214-M. |
||
| 08/04/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Site Engineering Review Comments: 1. Building plans, including the site design, must match what was approved in Development Package (Site Plan) TD-DEV-0525-00143. On review of sheets 5–7, the site plan referenced in the electrical plans does not match the approved site design. Revise the plans to carry the same dimensions shown in the approved plans. Alternatively, the approved site plan sheet may be incorporated directly into the building plan set rather than creating a separate, non-approved site plan. The response regarding site zoning is acknowledged; however, this does not resolve the discrepancy, particularly since the plans are explicitly marked "For Construction." |
||
| 08/04/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bobby Parsons Zoning Section Review PROJECT: TC-COM-1025-01795 – TD-DEV-0525-00143 6444 S. Fontana Ave. Tucson, AZ 85706 – C-2 Hybrid self-storage facility (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/4/2026 This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). Personal Storage is an allowed use subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.10.C.3 & .6. Comments: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Comment: Follow up to previous comment 2: Building plans including the site plan must match what was approved in the associated Development Package (TD-DEV-0525-00143). Sheets 4-10 on the building plans marked “Issued For Construction” have PAAL widths that are smaller than what was approved in the associated Development Package. Per UDC Table 7.4.6-2, PAAL’s within a storage use development must be a minimum of 30’. 2. Comment: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the plans submitted and responses to zoning review comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 07/22/2026 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |