Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-1024-02085
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/25/2024 | Water - PDSD | APPROVED | |||
| 11/26/2024 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 11/14/2024 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 11/14/2024 6:09:15 PM 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. GENERAL - MECHANICAL LOADS: The Mechanical Plan, M1.0, and the Mechanical Schedules, M2.0, indicate that new rooftop equipment is being installed. Because these units exceed 300 lb, a professional engineer is required to evaluate the existing framing and provide documentation that the roof has sufficient capacity to support the proposed loads. This documentation must carry the seal and signature of the evaluating engineer. If reinforcement of the roof is required, sealed details must also be provided. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 11/11/2024 11:37:44 AM Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Approved Reason: Date Completed : 11/14/2024 5:58:09 PM Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 11/4/2024 6:25:38 PM 1. E2.1 Missing description for Power Plan Key Note #20. 2. E4.0 Existing Riser Diagram #1 shows a 45 amp CB feeding the 112.5 KVA transformer. This is undersized and does not correlate with MDP panel schedule on sheet E4.1. Correct/coordinate to show actual conditions. Panel names also not coordinated. 3. E4.0 does not show new surge protection that is shown by MDP panel schedule on sheet E4.1. 4. E5.0 Should show (existing?) pull stations at all required exits. This is required per NFPA 72 and may be required per local code. Confirm if not required per local code or comply and show existing or new. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 11/10/2024 4:33:34 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). General: Plan set missing plan pages P1.0 & P1.1 as stated on plan page A0.0 sheet index. Provide plan pages P1.0 & P1.1 as stated on plan page A0.0 sheet index so a complete Plumbing & Gas review can done -2018 IPC 106.3.1 2) Plan Page P2.0: Missing fixture & appliance schedule that that listed manufacturer names & model numbers of the replaced fixtures & water heater. Add fixture & appliance schedule that that listed manufacturer names & model numbers of the replaced fixtures & water heater. -2018 IPC 303, 402, 501.5 |
||
| 11/15/2024 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -The exit that leads from sales to the stockroom is not approved. This does not comply with IFC 1016.2 #5 (exception 2). Either comply with this section or remove exit sign. This is a nonrequired exit since you already have two other code compliant exits. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 11/26/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TC-COM-1024-02085 7160 E BROADWAY BL. – C-2 General Merchandise Sales (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: November 26, 2024 Resubmittal requires a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). General Merchandise Sales is an allowed use in the zone (UDC Table 4.8-4), subject to a Use Specific Standard 4.9.9.B.1 1. Per UDC Article 3.3.3.G.2.c A site plan (Development Package) is required for the following types of development: Existing development undergoing a change of use, building structure additions, and/or a reconfiguration of an area outside a building. A development package (DP) meeting the requirements of the Checklist for Minor Changes to Commercial/Industrial Sites is required to be submitted and approved. The DP is a separate submittal from the building plans. The checklist can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/permits/minor_changes_to_commercial_industrial_sites_.pdf. The exterior changes, new compactor required a DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 10/31/2024 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/15/2024 | Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED |