Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0823-02017
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2023 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/05/2023 | External Reviewers - SAFEBuilt | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Structural(S) Reviewer Madeline Nelson mnelson@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/2/2023 8:21:56 PM 1. GENERAL - UPDATES: For project updates, please submit sheets with all changes clearly marked in revision clouds. Please provide a written response to each comment; updates without a clear response to all comments may not be reviewed. If you have any questions regarding the comments, you may contact me directly. Updates may result in additional comments. 2. GENERAL - SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: Please have the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge of this project complete and return the City of Tucson Special Inspections Certificate with signatures. The form can be downloaded at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/city-services/planning-developmentservices/documents/special_inspection_certificate.pdf 3. GENERAL – DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: Per the 2018 IBC, Section 106.3.4, “The registered design professional in responsible charge shall list the deferred submittals on the construction documents for review by the code official.” Due to the complexity of this project, please provide a complete list of all items that will be designed by a specialty engineer as a deferred submittal and include that list in the Structural General Notes. 4. S0.0 - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: The geotechnical report indicated under the "Foundation" notes on Sheet S0.0 does not match the geotechnical report submitted on August 21, 2023. Please either revise the Structural General Notes to reflect the date, project number and design recommendations of the geotechnical report on file or resubmit an updated report. As a reminder, the report should support the appropriateness of the selected foundation system, and all building code references must be updated to the current code adopted by the City. 5. S1.1 - FOUNDATION PLAN: Please confirm the grade beam geometry on Gridline 9. It appears that the continuous footing terminates at the wall for the elevator pit. Please verify that this is the intention and that there is adequate fixity between the grade beam and the concrete wall as required by the stamping engineer. 6. S2.1 - 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN: Currently, no size has been provided for the typical framing members between Grids 16-19/E-F on the 2nd Floor Framing Plan. Please provide a typical joist or truss size and indicate if a step in the framing is required at Gridline 18 where framing transitions from floor framing to roof framing. 7. S3.2 - SILL PLATE ANCHORAGE: The foundation details on S3.2 provide conflicting information on typical sill plate anchor size and spacing. Details 1 & 9 both show exterior conditions, while Details 2, 3, 5 & 11 show interior conditions. However, information between these details is inconsistent. Please verify. 8. S3.2 - CANOPY POST DETAIL: Detail 04/S3.2 shows the attachment of a glulam post to a concrete spread footing. The detail specifies (2) 3/4"dia. thru-bolts, but shows four anchors supporting the column. Please confirm the required number of anchors and verify that this detail is appropriate for use on sawn-lumber posts in addition to glulam posts, where occurs. 9. S4.4 - CMU FRAMING DETAILS: Details 06 & 07/S4.4 call for a 16" LSL rim joist to be attached to a CMU wall with masonry screws. LSL beams are not typically moisture-resistant. Please confirm that selected building materials have been approved for long-term exposure to masonry. 10. S4.5 - STAIR TOWER DETAIL: Detail 09/S4.5 shows the pop-up roof over the plan-southwest stairs. Below the high roof, there is framing that appears to be a stair landing servicing the roof level. The geometry depicted for this stair framing conflicts with typical stair framing details on S4.3, including Detail 06/S4.3. Fire protection of egress stairs should be consistent at all levels. Please confirm how fire protection is being achieved in Detail 09/S4.5. 11. S5.1 - FRONT CANOPY FRAMING: At the plan-west end of the front canopy, please confirm if canopy framing is continuous from PSL-to-PSL, through the unsheathed area. Detail 04/S5.1 appears to show continuous perimeter framing, with discontinuous rafters in Simpson joist hangers supported at the edge of the opening. If this is the design intention, please callout the beams framing the opening on plan. Second, please confirm the connection in Detail 03/S5.1 and provide information on fasteners into the 6x6 sawn lumber column. 12. S5.2 - REAR CANOPY FRAMING: Please confirm if columns are required at Grids H/9 and H/12 to support the 6x12 sawn lumber canopy beams. Where mechanical units are being shown on the canopy roof, please indicate a maximum unit weight that the roof has been designed to support. Finally, please review Details 04 & 07/S5.2. Both details show a wood beam at the canopy perimeter that is supporting the parapet wall via Simpson A34 clips, however, no beam appears on plan. Detail 04/S5.2 shows TJI roof framing where sawn lumber joists are being used. Detail 07/S5.2 does not have a section cut on plan, so additional framing information could not be confirmed. Building(B) Reviewer Andrew Bevis abevis@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/24/2023 1:30:25 PM 1. Sheet G1.1: The fire extinguisher cabinets (FEC) are indicated as being located in a rated corridor wall. However, the listed assembly provided on Sheet A10.3 doesn't permit the altering the assembly for the FEC. The wrapping of the gypsum board behind the FEC does not maintain the rating of the assembly. Provide a listed assembly that permits this occurrence or provide a rated FEC. 2. Sheet LS1.1: The allowable area provided is incorrect. Provide a corrected allowable area in accordance with Table 506.2. 3. Sheet LS1.1: The code data table indicates that it is aligned with the California Building Code. Provide an updated code data table that is aligned with the applicable and adopted codes of the City of Tucson. 4. Sheet LS1.1: The lobby is an assembly use and the occupant load has not been calculated properly. There is a distinct difference between occupancy classification and occupancy use. The exceptions of Section 303.1.2 apply to that of classification and the requirements of max. allowable area, height, stories, mix-use requirements and overall classification of the building. Yes, this space is considered as business in the overall context of the structure and can comply with the business requirements previously mentioned. However, when calculating occupant loads, one must calculate based on the use of the space. The lobby's use is assembly and the occupant load must be calculated as such in accordance with Section 1004 and Table 1004.5. 5. Sheet LS1.1: Detail 2/LS1.1: The end sleeping units on plan left are not separated properly. Provide properly separated sleeping units in accordance with Section 420.2. 6. Sheet LS1.1: Detail 2/LS1.1: The corridor at plan left is not rated properly. Provide a properly rated corridor in accordance with Section 1020.1. 7. Sheet A1.3: Roof drainage sizing calculations have not been provided. Add roof drain sizing calculations to the plumbing plan that derive from -IPC 1106.1 & 1106.2 & Tucson Amendment Appendix B rates of rainfall. 8. Sheet A1.3: GPM discharge amounts have not been provided for the roof/drain overflows. Provide the roof/drain overflows in accordance with 2018 IPC Section 1106.2. 9. Sheet A6.2: Hoistway protection has not been provided for the elevators. Provide hoistway protection in accordance with Section 3006.2.1 and 3006.3. Mechanical(M) Reviewer Jorge Valido jvalido@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 8/23/2023 8:39:27 PM Provide Ventilation Calculation Schedule as per IMC 2018 Table 403.3.1.1 Termination point of EXH-5 to exterior of building IMC 2018 Section 503.1.1 Provide exhaust riser drawing. Identify termination to Roof Hood systems at exterior of building. IBC 2018 Section [A]107.2.1Information on construction documents. Electrical(E) Reviewer Ron Ross rross@safebuilt.com Conditionally Approved Reason: Date Completed : 9/2/2023 2:47:13 PM Electrical Review of WoodSpring Suites By: Ron Ross PE E-1: Panels G404 thru G418 are missing destination/source feeds as compared to Panel G419 thru G436. Arrows shown may not be required. Clarify/correct as required. E-5: Keynotes 6 and 8 not properly shown. Plumbing(P) Reviewer Perry Hendershott phendershott@safebuilt.com Denied Reason: Date Completed : 9/4/2023 9:40:33 PM First Plumbing Review: 1). Need to Address Bldg. plan review comments 3, 4. 7 & 8. -IPC 403.1, 1106.3, 1106.5, 1108 2). Add Roof GPM loads that each set of scuppers & downspouts will be responsible for along with sizing calculations to Plan page A1.3 -IPC 1106.1, 1106.3, 1106.5, 1108 3). Plan page M- 2 Detail 2 shows independent wall exhaust & intake for gas water heaters, detail 5 on same shows single concentric wall termination? Plan page needs to correlate. -IFGC 106.3 4). Plan page M-2 detail single combustion air louver for gas dryers will need to be within 12" of ceiling -IFGC 304.6.2 5). Gas meter location on plumbing floor plan page P-4 isn't clear -IFGC 106.3.1 6). Add gas sizing table used to plan page P-6, -IFGC 402.3 7). show the P12 trench drain on plan pages P-2 & P-5 -IPC 106.3.1 8). Plan Page P1 note #1 is stating carrier toilets? the models selected & Plan page P5 riser diagram don't correlate with carrier toilet rough in style. -IPC 106.3.1 9). Coffee water line note #20 on Plan page P4 needs to include an ASSE 1022 or 1024 backflow -IPC 608.17.1.2 10). The P11 hose bibs on plan page P-4 need individual shut off valves -IPC 606.2 |
||
| 09/05/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Two way communication per 1009.8 required for elevator. Provide note on plans. -Emergency responder radio coverage shall be tested by PCWIN and report provided to TFD. If required, emergency responder communication enhancement system shall be installed. Add ERCES to your list of deferred submittals on sheet T1.1. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 08/28/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comments | ||
| 08/25/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Woodspring Suites TC-COM-0823-02017 – DP17-0182 2121 N. Craycroft Rd. – OCR-1 Travelers Accommodation, Lodging (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: August 25, 2023 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This site is located in OCR-1 Zone (UDC 4.7.26). Travelers Accommodation, Lodging is an allowed use in the zone (Table 4.8-4). 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with Development Package DP17-0182 and the building plans do not match the DP. A revision to the DP is required and must be approved prior to approval of this building plan. 2. As this site has a rezoning, C9-16-16, and the proposed building does not match Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) a revised PDP may be required. Contact John Beall (520) 837-6966 or email John.Beall@tucsonaz.gov for requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 09/18/2023 | Water - PDSD | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Show the location of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service pipe on a site plan. Provide the size of the water meter serving this building, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter, and the total water demand served by the water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018 | ||
| 08/18/2023 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |