Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Permit Number - TC-COM-0726-01092
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2026 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | NOT REQUIRED | No modifications to the outdoor lighting. | ||
| 09/10/2026 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/09/2026 | Commercial Electrical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Commercial Electrical Review TC-COM-0726-01092 (4350 E IRVINGTON RD TUCSON, AZ 85714) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Provide updated Plans/calculations and a written response Letter to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Resubmitted plans that do not contain a written response Letter addressing each of the notated items indicating action taken, may be delayed until response letter is received. Code reference, 2024 International Building Code (IBC), 2023 National Electrical Code (NEC), 2012 Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC). https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/building-code/2012_outdoor_lighting_code_.pdf Contact Jeremy Hamblin with any questions: Jeremy.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov 1. Please resubmit plans as a combined file, with all the sheets combined into one file. Do not submit the old plan-set. |
||
| 09/10/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Reviewer: John Mounsey – Engineering Associate - Site Engineering Reviewer Contact: John.mounsey@tucsonaz.gov Site Engineering Review To help speed up your resubmittal and facilitate shorter review timelines, please include a response letter along with your updated plans and any supporting calculations. In your response letter, address each comment individually and explain what changes were made and where they can be found in the plans. Submit your response letter and updated plan set as two separate files. Site Engineering comments are as follows: 1. The requirement for a Development Package listed in Version 1 has been removed. 2. The location of work within the greater TEP site is not easily identifiable, on the site plan, please include an aerial photo with a box indicating the area of work. 3. Please also include a North indicator on the site plan. |
||
| 08/25/2026 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |