Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Permit Number - TC-COM-0726-01070
Review Name: COMMERCIAL REVIEW - FULL v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2026 | Commercial Building Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 07/27/2026 | Commercial Electrical Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 08/03/2026 | Site Zoning Standard | APPROVED | |||
| 07/27/2026 | Outdoor Lighting Standard | NOT REQUIRED | No modifications to the outdoor lighting. | ||
| 07/17/2026 | Site Engineering Standard | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 08/05/2026 | Bldg Permits - Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 08/05/2026 | Commercial Mechanical Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TC-COM-0726-01070 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1375 N EL RIO DR TUCSON, AZ 85745 Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov. COMMENTS: 1. Sheet A1.4 identifies the rooftop unit as “new” in Keynote 5. But Sheet M1.1 shows the unit as an existing 5-ton unit. Please clarify and revise the plans as necessary to ensure the information is consistent between sheets. 2. Please provide an engineering evaluation verifying that the existing roof structure is capable of supporting the proposed 4-ton unit (AC-2). If any modifications to the existing roof framing are required to accommodate the added load, provide complete structural design and calculations prepared and sealed by an Arizona registered engineer. Reference: 2024 IBC Section 107.2.7. |
||
| 08/05/2026 | Commercial Plumbing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TC-COM-0726-01070 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1375 N EL RIO DR TUCSON, AZ 85745 Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov. COMMENTS: 1. Existing 5-ton unit is mentioned to have gas piping (Mechanical Demo Key Notes, Sheet MP1.0). Please clarify whether the existing equipment is gas fired or electric. If gas fired, please include in the gas demand table and ensure the gas piping sizing in accurate. If there are other gas-fired appliances, please show all other appliances connected to the gas meter and the total gas demand seen by the meter. Reference: Section 402, IFGC 2024. |
||
| 08/05/2026 | Fire New Construction Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Please include all fire alarm information. Is there an existing fire alarm? Do you plan on installing a fire alarm or modifying the existing fire alarm? Your occupancy classification and OL (E/241) requires a fire alarm per IFC 2024, 907.2.3 john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 08/05/2026 | Water - PDSD Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TC-COM-0726-01070 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1375 N EL RIO DR TUCSON, AZ 85745 Submit your revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all comments were addressed. Review will not proceed without the response letter. The submitted documents were incomplete and a thorough plan review could not be performed. Please be aware, new comments may arise with the next review. If you have any questions about these review comments, I can be reached at Sean.Severson@tucsonaz.gov. COMMENTS: 1. Existing water meter appears to be a 2” meter (#12381471). The 1-1/2” meter appears to serve the irrigation system and is supplied by reclaimed water. Please revise the water calculation table accordingly. 2. The water loss calculations indicate a 2” RPBP, while the notes identify a 1-1/2” reduced pressure backflow preventer. Please revise. |
||
| 07/16/2026 | PDSD Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |